Pinned Tweet
🔴 New Article
A Catechism on the Doctrinal Errors of the Novus Ordo Sect.
Please Read and Share 👇
medium.com/@MarkEscober1993/…
🔴 New Article
Refutation of the Feeneyite Sect.
Please Read and Share 👇
medium.com/@MarkEscober1993/…
Mark🇻🇦 retweeted
News: Bishop Roy reviews the first six months of Unam Sanctam, examining reactions from the FSSP, SSPX, defenders of the Cassiciacum Thesis, and conservatives, as well as the challenges and prospects for the future.
unamsanctam.org/news/review-…
Mark🇻🇦 retweeted
Q: What is the name of the 'theology' of people who call themselves 'traditional Catholics,' but at the same time publicly declare that a system the goal of which is the complete destruction of the Traditional Catholicism, ensures the Indefectibility of the Catholic Church?
A: The name of such 'theology' is 'perverted theology.'
Q: Then what could one call the 'theologians' who preach 'perverted theology'?
A: They could be called 'theological perverts' accordingly.
The Thesists, as a matter of fake necessity, have built the Thesis upon attacking Totalism, and constantly repeat these attacks. Yet if anyone makes the slightest criticism of the Thesis, he is accused of attacking the clergy or of causing division among sedes, and is blocked!
For more information, please read the following article: 👇
🛑 New Article
The Apostolic Succession Objection Refuted.
👇
medium.com/@MarkEscober1993/…
Mark🇻🇦 retweeted
The more they try to justify the errors of the Thesis, the more obvious and harder to defend they become.
The Cassiciacum Thesis, apart from being in manifest contradiction with Canon Law, is also in conflict with five dogmas of the faith; free yourselves from it.
His Excellency Bp. Sanborn, with his excellent knowledge of canon law, refutes Abbé Dutertre. However, the thesis is so contrary to canon law that even the very His Excellency, when attempting to justify the thesis, is forced to set aside his excellent knowledge of canon law.
Bp. Sanborn correctly rejects this view outright. He says that when the fact that a delict has occurred—that is, the heresy of the Novus Ordo popes—is known, the legal presumption operates against them, and it should not first have to be established in court. (3/4)
Fact: The Traditionalist Movement began with the joint action of the SSPX and the Sedes in response to the doctrinal errors of the Novus Ordo Popes; after Benedict XVI, it was hijacked by proponents of "Sola TLM" and reduced merely to a preference for "a better Mass".
Replying to @zx77789 @nashcatholicc
I have always been a traditional Catholic, who attends traditional Latin Masses in full communion with Popes Benedict, Francis, and Leo. I have never supported wandering, rogue Sedevacantist or Thuc-Line bishops.
My book infiltration explicitly rejects Sedevacantism in black-and-white.
Sedevacantists are trying to hijack the traditional movement in 2026, but they will fail because our Lord Jesus Christ never abandons His validly elected popes, even in a crisis.
Let us pray for dear Bp. Sanborn that he may no longer be forced to deny the clear facts of Canon Law, of which he himself is well aware, in order to justify the erroneous Thesis.
#Reject_The_Thesis_Join_Unam_Sanctam



















