Mark Bringelson retweeted
This is portrait of Françoise Gilot who had presided in Picasso's life for the previous seven years as mistress, ‘muse’ and the mother of their children Claude and Paloma.
Femme assise en costume rouge sur fond bleu painting by Pablo Picasso (1953).
letterboxd.com/bringelsonmar…
"You don't judge this blockbuster George Cukor film from pre-Code 1933 the same as you would a 2024 Chris Nolan movie. Different worlds, entirely. Obviously. That said, I loved this Cukor gem."
lareviewofbooks.org/article/…
". . .discovered among Babitz’s papers. . .a box of unmailed letters, including a remarkable one to “Dear Joan” — “that Joan, the Joan. Joan Didion.” In the letter, the centerpiece of this book, Babitz’s ambivalence toward Didion is on full display."
I'd never in a million yrs guess that that's John Sebastian - BUT I LOVE the idea that they went biking together like that. Hmm maybe some of Sebastian's fantastic talent for melody somehow seeped into Dylan by way of crotch pressing into blue jean butt. Sacrilegious of me?
trump welcomed this ridiculous nutjob & white nationalist to his personal dinner table as a guest at mar a lago, along with Kanye West who praised Adolph Hitler. Reportedly they had a lovely dinner.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
My lone voice in the wilderness of toxic Bro Masculinity: this movie sucks. Bullshit from start to finish. Phony. Weird content, worship of the 1st film throughout. I aborted, could not tolerate its gung-ho war pride. TOXIC. Fuck your stupid fake hero worship.
When Top Gun: Maverick (🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟) first dropped in May of 2022, I gave the sequel to Tony Scott’s cult classic the five-star treatment. I walked out of the theater utterly shocked at the quality of this film: everything about Maverick exceeded my expectations, which, to be fair, were not exceptionally high. I revisited Maverick in light of Gladiator II (🌟🌟) to see if this sequel actually holds up as well as I initially thought. I’m happy to say it does- Top Gun: Maverick is the blueprint for legacy sequels done right.
We should never take Maverick’s technical mastery for granted. Director Joseph Kosinski & Tom Cruise knocked it out of the ball park when it comes to all the major flight sequences- whether the film’s climax or the training scenes leading up to the major moment. But beyond the technical mastery, which earned a few Oscar nominations, the reason Maverick works so well is the story blends the past with the future. This sequel doesn’t turn its back on Maverick’s arc but doesn’t make this entire film about Maverick.
That framework allows Cruise to thrive because he doesn’t actually have to carry this film. Miles Teller & Glen Powell represent the future while Val Kilmer & Jennifer Connelly represent the past. That sort of balance allows Cruise to travel between the known & the unknown. In other words, it’s the exact recipe that makes this film one of the best legacy sequels ever created.
It’s also undeniable that Cruise needed to be in this film. No, he didn’t carry this movie & there’s so much quality filmmaking & acting around him to make this work. But imagine if Maverick didn’t include Cruise at all but just revolved around Miles Teller or just revolved around Powell? This film would subsequently fail because Cruise’s presence looms too large. That’s why the key to unlocking these sequels isn’t to turn your back on the key figure that made the original, it’s to figure out a way to weave what worked in the past with something that might work in the future.
“It’s not the plane, it’s the pilot.”
Biden never should have promised not to run for a second term & he never should have promised not to step in & pardon his son's unfair persecution. It's the foolishness of these 2 promises (both entirely political) that takes him down a bit in my eyes.
Authors I read the most as a teenager: DICKENS (Yes, Dickens, really, I loved his novels), TWAIN (everything), SALINGER (obsessed), HESSE, CAMUS, BAUM (ALL his Oz books, more obsession). There were others but these aforementioned ruled my mind.
Mark Bringelson retweeted
~Thirty Novels for #Noirvember~
1. IN A LONELY PLACE (1947). For many of the books on this list, toxic masculinity is like a chill in the room: felt but not discussed. Hughes’ astounding novel locks us inside the mind of a predator and forces us to confront what we find there.
Mark Bringelson retweeted
I wrote about how I take notes when I'm reading, and also why: not to be more "efficient" or "productive," but to dwell with a text more deeply--& also just as a way of relishing existence. With many photos of my notebooks. Link in profile.
You'd Be So Nice To Come Home To (Live 7/29/64) youtu.be/cUxA0P4Z_Y8?si=0qff… via @YouTube
There's sublime & then there's this Ella performance in France in 1964.























