I model professionally. HFT, MM, rust.

Joined January 2015
If anyone wants to read about one of the ways you can get flip flop bugs like this i wrote about it a few months ago. Its basically really easy to do and one of the fastest ways you can incinerate and account. markrbest.github.io/position…
~100m gone in in 13 minutes rough estimate assuming ~50-75 bps px impact times the 16b bybit volume
7
8
1
134
35,098
Si jamais vous êtes un solo quant ou solo algo trader qui a déjà une bonne vision sur son environnement mais qui atteint un peu un plafond de verre niveau infra, on peut potentiellement essayer de collaborer (on est une société de trading quant pour compte propre). Pour faire simple, vous avez déjà produit des strats gagnantes, vous savez chercher de l'alpha mais vous en avez assez de diriger votre stack technique et assez d'être seul (dans le sens où vous avez fait le tour et que vous savez que le partage avec d'autres sera EV+) On a de l'infra, du capital, de la force de dev, de la data. L’idée, c’est d’avancer étape par étape : un projet commun minimal, puis le partage d’une strat à faible alpha ou en fin de vie qu’on ferait tourner chez nous. On peut aussi simplement recevoir vos signaux en black box et n’être qu’exécuteurs. Vous pouvez m'envoyer un MP. Vous pouvez poser des questions en commentaires si besoin. PS : l'idée est une collab long terme avec possibilité de s'associer à court/moyen terme (aligner les intérets le plus tot possible pour diminuer la std).
16
3
1
141
31,822
The discussions around this makes me realise people a) don't understand how bad things are b) don't understand how bad its going to get.
I can promise you, bottom of my heart, pensions - private or state, will not exist 40 years from now
2
16
2,568
Mark Best retweeted
This was able to make money on 1h crypto up down in June 2025. The biggest lesson for me over the last year has been its better to try stupid stuff fast then iterate from there
8
4
166
15,580
It is possible for both of these things to be true 1) LLMs are the future of programming 2) They currently write absolute throw away garbage
3
19
1,387
People who think LLMs are good at programming have never understood the art in coding. It is a shame as that is the beautiful and most enjoyable part of the work.
3
1
20
3,194
Pros of using codex for cooking: You get an easy Belgian waffle recipe. Downside: The mix made 5x more than I wanted. Looks like I'm eating waffles all day.
1
7
674
What is the state of art for languages to use with AI ? -> quality of code (to train the model) -> quality/number of library (to have out of the box components). -> constraint by compiler, fail-fast languages, strongly typed, language opinionated.... -> High-quality tooling for checks, tests... A part of the AI's success is a strong early feedback loop (as a human). Have you try A/B testing on this. One backend in Rust vs Go, and Python (with ruff, mypy etc..). Vs. TypeScript? Many tks !
1
1
2
868
I think im just going to cut out the middle man and get codex to write everything in ASM.
I've never seen anyone here talk about writing cpp with LLMs. How good are they and do just just end up in segfault hell?
2
8
2,453
I've never seen anyone here talk about writing cpp with LLMs. How good are they and do just just end up in segfault hell?
8
1
1
22
7,155
The biggest mistake I made in life was not buying a flat in london when i was 12.
London Flat prices.... In terms of relative valuation (compared to overall England and Wales house prices), London Flats have round-tripped and are now close to the levels they were in 2006 (when the relative boom started).
10
1,127
Every one thinks they know how to BBQ until they meet an Argentinian.
2
2
12
2,271
Browsing baby toys. This is a great way to teach your kid how to play with plug sockets and defeat child safety locks.
7
654
There is nothing more human than AI vibe coding something one day and then saying it is utter garbage when reviewing it after some sleep.
10
729
Kenshi is a personality test
1
646
Mark Best retweeted
When market making, cross asset correlations are your friend. What's funny though is you can footgun yourself here if you assume markets are too efficient. Suppose you're on a secondary exchange making BTC, and some ALTCOIN, using something like the binance feeds as your source of truth. Your mm engine sees BTC jump 2bips and immediately reprices ALTCOIN, canceling your inner ask. But then nothing happens to ALTCOIN for the next couple of ticks, so your system forgets about the BTC jump and requotes ALTCOIN at the level implied by your feed + some basis adjustment. A few milliseconds later ALTCOIN does jump and you get picked off. So you had the right idea but the wrong execution. The market for ALTCOIN was actually less efficient than you assumed, and you backed off the signal too quickly. What's the solution? Modeling. You need to analyze tick data and model the correlations temporally. The precise impulse response function is something to be discovered empirically, but it's well motivated by the fact that there's an easily observable statistical relation: ALT_return ~ beta * BTC_return + epsilon (Or more generally ALT ~ beta_i * f_i + epsilon where f_i are factors.) For most coins. This leads to all kinds of modeling ideas.
6
11
128
12,016
I woke up this morning and thought I'm so glad it's Friday. That pretty much sum up how this week is going.
6
588
Replying to @CensoredTube
If the chute doesn't open don't worry you've got the rest of your life to fix it.
3
16
934
78,819
PSA: market cap cannot be realised.
3
550
If wages had kept pace with the economy, the average worker would be on $150k+. Wages have fallen since the 1970s for 3 real reasons… 1. Technology has undermined the value of labour. Tech makes hard jobs easy. It outsources labour to cheaper countries. It completely replaces some jobs. 2. Governments print money and create cheap debt to stimulate the headline numbers of the economy. When they do it it’s an invisible tax on work and it inflates the value of anything that can be bought with debt (ie: houses but not wages). 3. We’ve massively increased the supply of labour. Both genders working full time doubled the supply of labour for many types of work. Then the ability to make work remote more than doubled it again. More supply equals lower prices. Until we address the real reasons why the value of labour is so low we can’t solve the real problem. It might feel good to blame “billionaires” for everything but it’s a waste of time and energy if they’re not the real cause of the problem.
36
18
2
129
8,674