WWII / KOREA US MARINE'S PISSED OFF DAUGHTER!!!!

Trump is gonna be section 8 way before that.

@elonmusk just confessed, and he thinks he wrote a defense. Read his post again, slowly. "That loophole was closed last week." That's not a terms-of-service update. That's a confession with a timestamp. Here's what happened. On October 12–14, Ukrainian forces lost reliable Starlink connectivity on moving terminals. No warning. Units canceled missions. Interceptor drones, the ones that shoot down Russian drones aimed at apartment buildings and power plants, were among the systems hit. Then came the alibis. Trump said he didn't think he or Musk was responsible. Musk hinted the U.S. government might be behind it. Hegseth said nobody withdrew anything and it was about terms of service. Now Musk says SpaceX closed the "loophole" itself. So which is it? Somebody in that chain is wrong, and Elon just picked his version and put it in writing. The "offensive drones" excuse doesn't survive contact with physics. The restriction was a speed cap. A speed cap doesn't know whether a drone is attacking a Russian supply truck or intercepting a Shahed headed for a maternity ward. It just cuts the link. You don't get to call it a surgical policy against "offensive strikes" when the tool you used is a blunt instrument that grounded defense too. Then he split the blame. Starlink? "Our rules." Starshield? "The government's call. What they decide is up to them." Convenient, because Reuters reported the Starshield restriction order came from inside the White House. Musk's message to investigators is simple: look at the Pentagon, not at me. Nine U.S. senators from both parties have asked the Defense Department Inspector General to investigate, with a briefing due by November 1. Elon just pre-loaded his testimony on X, where nobody can ask a follow-up question. "This is NOT a threat." Nobody adds that sentence to something that isn't one. "If Starlink were turned off, the Ukrainian front line would collapse immediately." In the same post where he admits he already throttled it. That's not a statement of fact. That's a man reminding a country at war that he holds the off switch, and that he's already shown he'll use it. And he forgot something: he runs a public company now. SpaceX has traded on the Nasdaq since June. The CEO of a public company just announced that it unilaterally degraded service to a war-critical, U.S.-backed customer, without notice, and that the customer's front line depends entirely on his discretion. If I were a SPCX shareholder, I'd want to know whether that political and contract risk was disclosed the way he's now describing it. If I were on a Senate committee, I'd print that post and hand it to him at the hearing. Then the ending. "Virtue-signaling evil warmongers... May you burn in hell." That's not a CEO defending a business decision. That's a man who knows the questions are coming and wants the conversation to be about his anger instead of his timeline. So here's the timeline, plainly: • The service was cut without warning. • Defense was disrupted along with offense. • The President denied it was Musk. • Musk floated that it was the government. • Now Musk says it was Musk. • An investigation is opening. • He posted his defense first. "End of story," he says. No, Elon. It's the beginning of discovery.

TRUMP on HIGH GAS PRICES: We’re making money like we’ve never made before. They’ll say: President Trump is bragging about all the money they're making while people are suffering at the pump. I don’t give a damn. We’re making a freaking fortune.

Do not let their service be in vain. We must fight for them as hard as they fought for us and our country. 🇺🇸 #VoteBlueToSaveDemocracy 🗳️

We suspected this was the reason Ukraine’s access to Starshield was restricted. But to see it from senior officials in this reporting is still utterly unconscionable. Let’s be absolutely clear about what this means. The Trump Administration deliberately restricted technology Ukraine relies on to intercept Russian drones and ballistic missiles. It made it harder for Ukraine to defend itself and easier for Russia to carry out its deadly attacks against Ukrainian civilians. They knew exactly what was at stake. They knew that more Russian drones and missiles would get through, allowing Russia to kill even more Ukrainians. And yet they went ahead anyway. This is a deliberate weaking of Ukraine’s defenses that only Russia will benefit from. It is a betrayal of our ally that this Administration cannot wash its hands of. The American people deserve to know who made this decision, why they made it, and how they can possibly justify putting more innocent Ukrainian lives in the crosshairs of Putin’s war machine. reuters.com/world/europe/ord…

I’ll stipulate that Trump is an agent of Putin. Go down the checklist. 1. Destroyed the Western alliance? Putin wanted that. 2. Threatened a NATO ally over Greenland? Putin wanted that. 3. Pulled out of the intermediate nuclear pact? Putin wanted that. 4. Withdrawing 25-40,000 troops from Western Europe while Russian bellicosity is rising? Putin wanted that. 5. Russian satellites giving coordinates to Iranians killing our soldiers, and his response is “they kill us, we kill them”? What American president says that? I think he’s been compromised. The election of Donald Trump may be the greatest foreign policy success in post-Czarist Russian history.