@Madroxi
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Yelling at swarms
Joined March 2018
- Tweets1.2K
- Following130
- Followers34
- Likes670
#Lanterns would have benefited immensely from dropping the whole season at once
For the last year a portion of my timeline has been dedicated to very heated fan arguments over if Cloud likes Tifa or Aerith more and I kinda love how it keeps me grounded on other bullshit.
Navier-Brokes retweeted
safety cartel
/ˈseɪf.ti kɑrˈtɛl/
noun
A coalition of dominant firms that invokes safety to justify coordinated limits on the pace or terms of competition. This can include common restrictions, government enforcement, or exemptions from ordinary antitrust constraints, especially when those measures allow participants to slow down without sacrificing their relative competitive positions.
Especially: a group of frontier AI companies advocating industry-wide “pacing,” common capability limits, or regulatory checkpoints that constrain faster-moving rivals while preserving incumbent advantages.
See also: regulatory moat, incumbent protection, coordinated pacing.
“When competitors need an antitrust waiver to coordinate how fast their industry is allowed to advance, critics may call it a safety cartel.”
Can't believe I'm saying this but Calcanis gets it
All the regulations being floated by frontier model companies must be viewed through the lens of them losing tokens to Open-Source models.
The timing of these regulations seems to line up perfectly with Open Source closing the gap significantly (but not completely) — and @nvidia going all in on open source in the last 60 days.
If we’re gonna regulate, why don’t we require that last year’s frontier models and weights be open-sourced?
This is why we have antitrust laws, so you don't have to wonder if a bunch of powerful people came to an anti-competitive agreement in a back room.
And ICs wonder why they're pestered for daily updates in standup
Finally realized why it’s so exhausting and stressful to work with AI agents 8h a day.
When delegating a task, you want to be assured it’s off your plate and you can forget about it, knowing it will be done completely and correctly. AI doesn’t give you that: you need to check it’s doing the right thing, it’s not forgetting anything, not taking short cuts etc.
So it adds to your mental load, rather than removing from it.
Companies benefit when the executive can model the business in their head. For technical companies, that means systems. That means you're iterating across the business.
That can be frustrating to ICs who see that as their job because it gnaws at the illusion of autonomy
Yep. Except:
1. This was about important internal tools. The team was stuck in some architecture nightmare of their own doing (writing it in rails but headless, with graphql api, and a SPA react app, constantly needing frontend engineers for changes). I call this kind of thing 'cosplaying an enterprise production app'. All that complexity was in the way and using straight rails was perfect in that case.
2. I make calls like this all the time. Usually someone on the team asks me to. They see what needs to happen but don’t want to be the bad guy. I’m happy to just make the call if I agree with the premise. Saves enormous amounts of meetings and change management etc. Sometimes this is jokingly referred to as Founder-mode-as-a-service here.
3. For ten years I’ve also run an internal podcast called Context, where I revisit decisions like these and explain the reasoning so everyone can learn from them. This is helpful to give people all the variables that were considered and why this was the choice made given the information available at the time. I want to teach how to make such decisions effectively without needing me. Sunk cost fallacy is a problem.
4. Any notions that Shopify is succcessful despite of me doing this, instead of because of it, will have a hard time making their argument come together I think 😄
the part of 'two weeks later tobi learns about...' is nonsese and the pivot of that project up there happens one of the more successful examples of interventions. But getting the company to work effectively with great architecture and low technical debt baggage into the right direction is literally the job, so guilty as charged I suppose.
But there are always cope stories floating around like this because they are more fun, than saying 'somehow we needed tobi to stop doing silly architecture astronautics'. I can totally see that.
No matter what AI can do, it's constrained by its verbs. It has all the same access to the internet a human does.
AI Doomerism requires you to believe, by proxy, that a sufficiently intelligent person could take over or destroy the world from a laptop.
Doomerism is a recurring pattern in history, and requires you to believe "this time it's different" because it's never been true, ever. It's why they deputize fiction in their argument because history has no true examples.
I once spoke to YouTube's product director, and we talked about what a headache Shorts have been.
They needed to compete with TikTok, but it only cannibalized their audience away from YouTube's core content, which hurt creator monetization.
It would be an interesting experiment to airdrop a bunch of Americans into Australia to see if they can out compete a local company.
The slop callers are starting to eat themselves
Uh, is this a typo or AI slop? Is it supposed to say VIP; that clearly says VIR & if it’s supposed to be vermin, that would also be a typo 😅 @pax @TychoBrahe