Pinned Tweet
MJ's scandals can't be explained in a soundbite, which is what the media expects (Gayle offered Weitzman 30 seconds to rebut LN in '19).
But Season 1 of @Case4Innocence presents more than 15.5 HOURS of fact-based, heavily researched material on them all.
michaeljacksoncaseforinnocen…
𝐒𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏 𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐩𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞!
"𝑰𝒕'𝒔 𝑻𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒓 𝑴𝒆 𝒕𝒐 𝑮𝒆𝒕 𝑴𝒊𝒏𝒆"
Summing up the case evidence
Thank you for any shares and reviews!
Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/5OFkjo…
Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcas…
#MichaelJackson #MJInnocent
9) Failure to File a Creditor's Claim
"JS already petitioned to file a claim against the Estate based on these exact same false allegations. Court dismissed that petition with prejudice in 2015—this lawsuit is simply an attempt to end-run the law, which clearly precludes JS."
The preliminary statements are worth resharing.
"A meritless sham."
"Wade recanted his testimony in a criminal trial for the sole & express purpose of taking money away from MJ's children, heirs & beneficiaries. Wade's complaint does not and cannot seek anything other than 🤑."
Continuing affirmative and alternative defenses ("not to be construed as an admission"):
3) Barred full or in part, on the grounds that JS engaged in acts and/or courses of conduct constituting fraud on Defendants.
4) Barred entirely by applicable statutes of limitations.
6) No Causation: JS cannot show that any acts or omissions of the Corps caused him damages.
"When MJ was frivolously accused in 93 & investigated, JS defended MJ and rejected the allegations, including false allegations that MJ had engaged in wrongdoing w/ Safechuck himself."
The estate notes how recent depositions taken as part of Safechuck's case likewise support this:
"Over the last several months, significant confidential deposition testimony in Safechuck's case has emerged that readily supports the comparative fault and Proposition 51 defenses."
The proposed amended answer to James's 3rd amended complaint (TAC) recites defenses.
Starting with general & specific denials: "The TAC fails to state any legitimate causes of action and the Corporations will be filing motions for summary adjudication / judgment in due course."
The defense emphasizes how much of the existing discovery and depositions already explored theories of comparative fault, which the estate also asserted nearly 8 years ago in a reply to Wade's complaint.
That, combined with the 2+ years before trial would not prejudice the case.
A 2nd hearing is planned for Nov. 5 seeking to allow MJ's side to amend their answers to the complaints, in order to introduce additional arguments that could reduce any amount owed in the event of a loss.
Carpenter did not volunteer to allow this, so the estate filed a motion.
WADE & JAMES CASE: New Proposed Timeline (Late-2028)
Ahead of an upcoming hearing, another joint status update has been filed.
Both sides proposed another extended delay:
Feb. 28, 2028 - Written Discovery Cut-Off
May 15, 2028 - Deposition Cut-Off
November 13, 2028 - Trial
Wade & James Case Status—Fall 2026 Edition 😴:
This month, MJ's side plans to depose Stephanie Safechuck on two dates. This follows James's on 9/14 and Adrian McManus's on 9/17. Chabre (CEO MJJ Enterprises '92-96) TBD.
The status conference has been delayed until October 16th.
Carpenter appointed 3 additional attorneys at his firm for trial readiness and general correspondence:
Megan Gyongyos (Senior Trial Lawyer)
Olivia Alcks (Trial Lawyer)
Pejman Ben-Cohen (Partner)
They specialize in general personal injury, whereas Finaldi's firm was CSA-centric.





























