We have a system for a quick swap (exchange) of coins In order to exchange, you just need to send USTC/LUNC to this address: terra1fzfj25p9urx7zzaqksgk3kqh63m5uha5llr9tu and in a few seconds you will receive an equivalent amount in LUNC / USTC on your balance By sending LUNC you will receive USTC By sending USTC you will receive LUNC Our swap fee is 1% Minimum quantity to send: 5 USTC and 500 LUNC If you send less than that, the bot will not be able to send anything back If errors occur, write here: [email protected] Telegram: @AFZ_LC #LUNCcommunity #LUNC #LuncBurn

I have voted on the following #LUNC governance proposals: Proposal #11671 - This proposal is that after the 800M USTC reaches our community pool, to burn 80%, leaving 20% to fund the chain, in-line with our current 80/20% tax split. This is a good idea which goes toward those calling for USTC burns but still gives a good portion to help fund our chain's development (20% of 800M USTC is 160M USTC worth $2.5M at current prices). There are concerns that this money could be quickly re-entered into circulation but I see those as unfounded, as any release would require a spend proposal to pass governance which is not an easy accomplishment, and any release would be gradual over time. There are also concerns that the entire 100% should be burned to help the USTC re-peg. I don't agree with this in this instance with these funds, as the point of USTC re-peg is by the algorithm/mechanism to bring USTC to $1. USTC re-peg is not to burn all inactive USTC. That is a method being pursued to make re-pegging USTC easier, but it's not the actual method that will re-peg USTC, which so far is proposed to be the tax divergence protocol proposed by Redline, or a revival of the market maker algorithm. My point is that people shouldn't be obsessing over every shred of USTC that it can't be used for development and must be burned before the re-peg is even attempted. If the USTC re-peg is going to work then by the design and protocol it will bring USTC to peg. Seeking to burn all inactive USTC first is putting the cart before the horse. First the USTC re-peg should be fully explored, safely tested, turned on, proven to work, then priority can move to dealing with inactive USTC. Showing further development progress or even beginning the process of USTC re-peg, both will go towards negotiating ability with large holders of inactive USTC (I don't support erasing funds from third party held wallets as has been recently proposed). We need to develop our chain for LUNC and also USTC, and these funds will help us do so. Our funding rate to the community pool will drop by half at the next chain upgrade as of the 20% going to the community pool from the on-chain tax, half will begin to go to the oracle pool in accordance with proposal #11513. We do have need of funds and 20% of this USTC which came from the community pool and belongs to the community is more than fair and appropriate to be used in this way. While I think putting 80% to the oracle pool for staking rewards is another good option, burning 80% and keeping 20% in the community pool is something I support, and I voted YES on this proposal. Proposal #11663 - in this proposed distribution of the 800M USTC, 50% is burned, 25% goes to the community pool and 25% goes to create a staking fund for USTC to be staked (no governance rights for staking USTC). There are other parts like requiring part of the staking fund to be burned when rewards are paid out, that I believe was extra complexity for a single proposal. There would be development complexity in allowing USTC to be staked (UST used to be staked on Anchor). Also I favour more direct funding to the oracle pool rather than allowing USTC to be staked, though I am not opposed to this plan. At this time given the strong desire in the community to burn the USTC, I believe a higher portion should be burned and favour the 80/20% plan, and therefore as I am not opposed to this plan directly I voted ABSTAIN, which contributes to quorum. Proposal #11660 - this proposal is to burn 100% of the 800M USTC after it reaches the community pool. I do not support this plan and believe we should retain part of the funds for on-chain development, and for the reasons I stated above, I voted NO on this proposal. These are my votes that I believe are good and appropriate. If you disagree you can cast your own vote for your staked portion, or redelegate to another validator who better represents your interests. If you have any questions please leave them below. God bless you. Christopher. JESUSisLORD ✝️ LUNC Validator