Creating weird sensors in lab :) Interested in technologies for sensing, computing and transmitting.

Singapore
Joined November 2020
very excited to share our work on #rscposter #RSCMat #RSCENG Using our understanding of recombination in perovskite-organic tandem interfaces, we designed a single pixel LED that changes emission from red to green! This efficiently preprocess images, enabling real-time display.
2
9
38
1,540
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
All variations of Solomon's chessboard! After reloading, the pieces on the new character's board rearrange into a new layout based on his remaining ammo count. Every position is taken from an actual historical game. 8: Maurice Ashley vs. Josh Waitzkin (1999) 9: Nakamura vs. Van Wely (2010) 10: GothamChess vs. Martinez Duany (2024) 11: Kasparov vs. Topalov (1999), "Kasparov's Immortal Game" 12: Ashley vs. Sofia Polgar (1992) 13: Judit Polgar's victory over Kasparov (2002) 14: Deep Blue's first win against Kasparov in a classical game (1996) 15: White mates in 6 moves 16: Emory Tate vs. Yudasin (1997), "Tate's Immortal Game" 17: Carlsen vs. Anand (2014), Game 6 of the World Chess Championship 18: Irina Krush vs. Alice Lee (2025) 19: Tal vs. Smyslov (1959) 20: Morphy's "Opera Game" (1858) 21: Korchnoi vs. Karpov (1974), Game 21 of the Candidates Final 22: Botvinnik vs. Keres (1948) 23: Anderssen vs. Kieseritzky (1851), "The Immortal Game" 24: Fischer vs. Benko (1963) 25: Botvinnik vs. Spielmann (1935), win in 12 moves 26: Undefined; black pawn on c8 appears to be a diagram error 27: Morphy vs. Schulten (1857) 28: Christiansen vs. Karpov (1993), Karpov loses in 12 moves 29: Légal's Mate, queen sacrifice trap 30: Zapata vs. Anand (1988), Anand loses in 6 moves 31: Scholar's Mate, checkmate in 4 moves 32: Double Bongcloud played by Carlsen and Nakamura (2021)
100
2,088
301
23,824
842,477
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
PhD course in applied econometrics be like
15
287
50
2,470
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
Passive thermal management of electronic devices using sorption-based evaporative cooling by Ruzhu Wang & co-workers cell.com/device/fulltext/S26… Highlights: • Cooling performance is evaluated both experimentally and numerically • The proposed method could achieve a maximum 20°C temperature reduction • The cooling power of the proposed method could reach up to 602 W/m2 • The proposed method is evaluated in a state-of-the-art 5G base station
1
1
159
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
A disposable reader-sensor solution for wireless temperature logging by Ada Poon & co-workers cell.com/device/fulltext/S26… Highlights: •A battery-free, sticker-like reader for wireless passive sensors •A passive wireless sensor capable of recording temperature abuse history •Uses self-oscillation for reader simplicity rather than forced excitation
1
155
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
Even more. Find the most-eigenvalue component in the model’s latent space.
2
5
3
79
64,000
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
Just out, probably some of the most fundamental and intricate work from the group! We prove that the conventional mid-gap model used for decades to interpret the absorption of field-induced polarons in conjugated polarons is incorrect …1/5 pubs.rsc.org/en/content/arti…
4
10
3
90
13,062
"Chemist must resist the temptation to make his own physics; if he does, it will be bad physics - just as physicist has sometimes been tempted to make his own chemistry, and then it was bad chemistry." #weekendread
6
49
5
241
39,955
My intro to correlated electron materials passed 1000 views, thank you! I made this as an intro to the group and for incoming students. This way they can watch on their own time, and should feel more comfortable asking questions: youtube.com/watch?v=sp_f8UlV…
10
61
5,213
🔥🔬 Exciting moment! We're taking the samples out of the furnace after 6 hours at 925°C. 🌡️✨ Check out our video capturing our first try to get #LK99 substance. 🔍 #ResearchUpdate #SampleAnalysis
115
313
112
3,374
2,932,212
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
Congrats to three #NTUsg professors and three researchers who were honoured with the Singapore National Institute of Chemistry (SNIC) Awards for their outstanding contributions to the field of #chemistry. #NTUsgProfs #NTUsgStudents
1
2
2
16
4,271
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
I'd like to have a real conversation about whether AI is a risk for human extinction. Honestly, I don't get how AI poses this risk. What are your thoughts? And, who do you think has a thoughtful perspective on how AI poses this risk that I should talk to?
645
652
142
3,540
833,202
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
"What software can I use to make 3D scientific illustrations?" I receive this question almost every day and below is my answer (long read)🧐 #sciart When it comes to creating scientific illustrations, 3D design software can be a powerful tool for creating accurate and visually engaging images. However, with so many different 3D design software options available, it can be challenging to decide which one is the best fit for your needs. Below I will discuss the pros and cons of some of the most popular 3D design software options for scientific illustrations. Blender Blender is a free and open-source 3D design software that is widely used in the scientific community. It offers a wide range of features, including modeling, animation, and rendering. One of the biggest advantages of Blender is its community support, which is highly active and constantly improving the software. Additionally, Blender can be used on a wide range of platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. Pros: Free and open-source Wide range of features Community support Cross-platform compatibility Cons: Steep learning curve User interface can be overwhelming for beginners Limited compatibility with other software Maya Maya is a popular 3D design software used in the film and gaming industries, but it is also used in scientific illustration. It offers a range of features, including modeling, animation, and simulation. Maya is highly customizable and can be integrated with other software, making it a versatile tool for scientific illustrators. Pros: Wide range of features Highly customizable Integration with other software Strong community support Cons: Expensive licensing fees Steep learning curve Can be overwhelming for beginners Cinema 4D Cinema 4D is a 3D design software that is widely used in the advertising and motion graphics industries. It offers a range of features, including modeling, animation, and rendering. Cinema 4D has a user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate, making it a good option for beginners. Pros: User-friendly interface Wide range of features Integration with other software Strong community support Cons: Expensive licensing fees Limited features compared to other software Not as widely used in the scientific community SketchUp SketchUp is a 3D design software that is widely used in architecture and engineering, but it can also be used for scientific illustration. It offers a range of features, including modeling and rendering. SketchUp is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of use, making it a good option for beginners. Pros: User-friendly interface Easy to use Integration with other software Large library of 3D models available Cons: Limited features compared to other software Not as widely used in the scientific community Limited community support 3ds Max 3ds Max is a 3D design software that is widely used in the architecture, gaming, and visual effects industries, but it can also be used for scientific illustration. It offers a range of features, including modeling, animation, and rendering. 3ds Max is highly customizable and can be integrated with other software. Pros: Wide range of features Highly customizable Integration with other software Strong community support Cons: Expensive licensing fees Steep learning curve Can be overwhelming for beginners ZBrush ZBrush is a 3D design software that is widely used in the film, gaming, and digital sculpting industries, but it can also be used for scientific illustration. It offers a range of features, including digital sculpting and painting. ZBrush is known for its advanced sculpting tools and the ability to create highly detailed and organic shapes. Pros: Advanced sculpting tools Integration with other software Strong community support Large library of 3D models available Cons:Expensive licensing fees Limited features compared to other software Can be overwhelming for beginners In conclusion, when choosing 3D design software for scientific illustration, it's important to consider the specific features and capabilities that you need, as well as your budget and level of experience. Each software option has its own unique pros and cons, so be sure to do your research and choose the software that best fits your needs.
19
275
10
1,615
391,064
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
In my opinion, the winners would be the Motic BA310 MET-T (4000Eur) or the system based on the zoom lens with the turret of objectives (1000eur). The zoom lens based one can be easily used to do deterministic transfer as well (as shown in the picture), so 2 systems by the same $
1
1
7
828
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
The whitepaper preprint of #NeuroBench project:NeuroBench: Advancing Neuromorphic Computing through Collaborative, Fair, and Representative Benchmarking:lnkd.in/g6k4E-Nx We are so excited to be involved with this project!
4
2
10
973
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
Thanks to all the co-authors, we had a lot of fun plotting all your inks!
1
2
1
22
2,803
Si En Ng (Timothy) retweeted
Plants do not suffer in silence. Instead, when thirsty or stressed, they make “airborne sounds,” according to a new study go.nature.com/3Zvppn4
12
150
60
442
125,156
the only chesspiece that goes through units is the knight.
1
59