Marcos retweeted
¿Cómo se sortea un jurado para resolver un reclamo? Kleros Live Stream en Español del 7 de septiembre, grabación completa: xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1dxYladgk…
Marcos retweeted
New puzzle, as part of the series of monthly puzzlers with @MoMath1.
As a variant: What if you start with pegs in all four corners of the square, and you want them to end up on corners of a bigger square?
Marcos retweeted
🟢 We're live on the Kleros Live Stream, our call every Wednesday.
Today it's about privacy: private evidence, hidden votes, and how much of a case can stay confidential while the process stays verifiable.
Join in ↓
xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1AGRnnDBe…
Marcos retweeted
📚 Eighteen academic papers cited Kleros between March and June 2026. We are highlighting four, with the rest of the volume below.
“Who governs the ledger: rethinking blockchain governance through democratic innovation”
Mosa Motea and Pius Oba, Wits Business School
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Nature Portfolio
Token voting keeps control with early adopters and institutional holders. The repairs they propose are deliberative, and Kleros appears among the live pilots.
“Decentralised Justice: How Kleros Empowers Jurors in Online Dispute Resolution”
Nicolas Kyriakides, Eva Manolova and Nicoletta Zacharopoulos, Procedural Law Unit at the University of Nicosia
Revista Ítalo-española de Derecho Procesal, Marcial Pons
A complement to judicial AI rather than a competitor: partial automation, with human judgement at the centre.
“Distributed Legal Infrastructure for a Trustworthy Agentic Web”
Tomer Jordi Chaffer, Victor Jiawei Zhang, Sante Dino Facchini, Botao 'Amber' Hu, Helena Rong, Zihan Guo, Xisen Wang, Carlos Santana and Giovanni De Gasperis
arXiv
Five layers for an agentic web. The adjudication layer is explicitly inspired by Kleros-style arbitration.
“Challenges of Blockchain-Based Arbitration with Emphasis on the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award: A Case Study on the Kleros Arbitration Mechanism”
Sirous Heidari and Vahideh Yousefi, Shiraz University
Journal of Legal Studies
What it takes for a blockchain arbitral award to be recognised under conventional international law.
Also in this volume:
“Blockchain and the Ethics of Transformation: A Critical Theory of Technology Perspective on the Loss of Legacy Institutions”
Motea and Oba, Philosophies (MDPI)
“An Arbitration Revelation? The Evolution of AI and Online Arbitration”
Emily Bishop, Arbitration Law Review (Penn State Dickinson Law)
“Watching the Watchmen: Overseers' Algorithm Aversion in AI Arbitration”
Bahadır Köksal, SSRN
“Digital Democracy in Decentralised Autonomous Organisations”
Theodor Beutel, Parminder Kaur Makode, Claudio J. Tessone and Uwe Serdült, European DAO Workshop (Springer)
“Cognitive Oracles: On-Chain Explainable Machine Learning”
Marco Esposito, Francesco Bruschi and Donatella Sciuto, Computer Communications (Elsevier)
“Blockchain and the Future of Dispute Resolution: Decentralized Justice Systems”
Sharma, Agarwala and Sharma (IEEE)
“Decentralized Dispute Resolution in International Trade with Blockchain and Smart Contracts”
Yadav and Singh (ASCE)
“Smart Contracts in Energy Markets: Legal Enforceability, Liability, and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms”
Mobo (IGI Global)
“From Agora to Algorithm: Reinventing the Public Square in the Digital Age”
Coad, Australasian Parliamentary Review
“Digital Sovereignty in the Age of Hyper-History”
Tan, SSRN
“Recognition and enforcement of Kleros awards as arbitral awards: the Mexican practice”
Trí, Vietnamese Legal Science Journal
“Menguji Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Smart Contract”
Putra, Fitriana and Triananda
Did we miss your paper? Let us know.
Marcos retweeted
La charla de Juan Maldacena en la Usina del Arte, en Buenos Aires (28/07/26): youtube.com/live/2nooU_KfIns…
Marcos retweeted
⚖️ Kleros Live Stream ⚖️ xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1Dxleelow…
Marcos retweeted
John Tukey the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) inventor, who coined both "bit" and "software" died exactly 26 years ago today.
The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), one of the most important algorithms in signal processing and data analysis, was introduced by Tukey & Cooley in 1965.
In 1805, Gauss - studying the orbits of asteroids Pallas and Juno - came up with a method to interpolate their trajectories from discrete samples. What he came up with was mathematically very close to the modern FFT but Gauss never published that work, and didn’t analyze its computational complexity. It predated even Fourier’s 1822 work on heat diffusion - but without the framing or generalization that Cooley & Tukey would bring 160 years later.
In 1965, Cooley & Tukey published their now-famous algorithm that reduced the cost of computing a Discrete Fourier Transform from 𝑂(𝑛²) to 𝑂(𝑛 log𝑛). This leap made real-time signal processing and digital media compression feasible.
From radio telescopes to JPEGs, from audio codecs to quantum mechanics - the FFT is everywhere. It’s one of the most important (and elegant) algorithms of the 20th century - rooted in the genius of Gauss, but brought to life in the computer age.
Marcos retweeted
🏛️ The new Kleros website for governments and municipalities is live.
There's a huge opportunity for administrations willing to rethink how they resolve disputes, and this helps them take that step. Less friction for citizens, more trust in institutions, and processes anyone can follow from start to finish.
Come in and see everything it offers: how the solution works, the kinds of conflicts it handles, the results it's already delivering, and how to take the first step.
Link below ↓
Marcos retweeted
Accidentally stepping on one of those pointy bits in the margins while in your bare feet - 13th century, BnF Latin 14284, f. 11r
Marcos retweeted
Brian the village idiot on a night out - 1300, Digitalisierte Sammlungen, Sächsische Weltchronik : Ms. germ. fol. 129, f. 102r
Marcos retweeted
⚖️ Kleros Live Stream ⚖️ xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1DGleerqo…
Marcos retweeted
We can speak different language, but music is a language that all people understand.
Where do we go?
When we have no home to return to?
Flowers beneath concrete,
Mom,
Tell me,
Where do we go?
Do we ever truly know?
Or are we always pretending?
Where does the heart wander when it's lost?
Through doubts and winter frost?
Why do all days blend into one another?
Do we eventually see what we've been building?
Mom, tell me.
Beyond
The storm, there lies
Love, love, love,
When the sky opens,
Everything grows calm again
And all is well.
Where does it go?
Happiness, that fragile thread,
When it wavers and breaks?
Mom, tell me,
Where does it go?
Why does the world seem so vast,
When we grow just a little taller than before?
What becomes of dreams that flee?
And memories we forget?
Will I always have these questions?
Perhaps I'll turn them into songs.
Mom, tell me.
Beyond
The storm, there lies
Love, love, love,
When the sky opens,
Everything grows calm again
And all is well.
Marcos retweeted
Te gustaría tener a Kleros en tu ciudad? Ponete en contacto aquí!
kleros.io/contact
Marcos retweeted
The first movement of Violin Concerto in E minor, Op. 64 is one of Felix Mendelssohn-Bartholdy's most celebrated works. It is admired for the lyrical, vocal quality of its melodies and the coherence of its structure. Yet the enduring vitality of the movement arises not from these qualities alone, but from the way Mendelssohn shapes the entire work as a continuous process of development, in which each musical idea grows from material already established while simultaneously preparing the way for what follows. It is this organic continuity that gives the movement its distinctive persuasive power. To understand why, one must begin with its most concrete musical details.
The first striking feature is Mendelssohn's decision to introduce the solo violin almost immediately, rather than reserving an extended orchestral introduction in the manner of the Classical concerto tradition. The violin enters at once with the principal theme, unfolding a melody that is long, supple and unmistakably song-like. From the opening bars, the listener does not feel as though the narrative is waiting to begin; rather, one is drawn into a musical process that already seems to be in motion. This manner of opening establishes a sense of continuity from the very outset and defines the character of the movement as a whole.
The violin's melodic writing is built chiefly from stepwise motion interspersed with moderate leaps. Instead of presenting isolated musical gestures, Mendelssohn shapes his phrases into long, flowing arcs, each seeming to arise naturally from the one before it. As one motif reaches its conclusion, its closing notes frequently become the point of departure for the next. The ear therefore seldom perceives the music as a sequence of detached units, but rather as a single line of development unfolding from within itself.
Equally significant is Mendelssohn's treatment of his musical motifs. He rarely introduces an entirely new idea only to abandon the old. Instead, previously stated motifs are continually transformed through changes of pitch, rhythm, expression or harmonic setting. When a familiar motif returns in a new guise, the listener immediately recognises its relationship to what has already been heard while simultaneously perceiving its transformation. It is this union of familiarity and renewal that allows the music to develop without ever seeming fragmented.
Rhythm likewise plays an essential part in sustaining this continuous movement. Between the violin's expansive lyrical phrases appear short, flexible rhythmic figures that provide constant forward impetus. These patterns, however, never unfold at random. They are frequently repeated with subtle adjustments of accent or metrical emphasis, sufficient to maintain momentum while preserving a sense of unity. The listener therefore experiences an unbroken impulse of progression without any impression that the musical thread has been interrupted.
At a deeper level, it is the harmony that gives the entire process a clear sense of direction. Mendelssohn creates moments of tension through passing harmonies, non-chord tones and carefully judged modulations into closely related keys. Yet each expansion is meticulously prepared and ultimately resolved back to stable tonal centres. The ear continually rediscovers its tonal point of reference and thus never loses sight of the broader trajectory of the movement.
The orchestra is organised according to the same principle. It serves not merely as accompaniment to the solo violin but frequently receives, echoes and develops the motifs first introduced by the soloist. As musical ideas pass from violin to orchestra and back again, the listener perceives not two independent voices but a single musical thought unfolding through contrasting colours. The dialogue between soloist and orchestra therefore creates not opposition but an ever richer expansion of the musical structure while preserving its essential unity.
As the movement unfolds, the listener is drawn not only to the beauty of its melodies but also to the relationships between them. Each idea leads naturally to the next, so that the entire movement appears as an organic whole in continual expansion rather than a succession of isolated episodes. Its persuasive power lies not in any single memorable passage, but in the coherence of the process as a whole.
At a deeper level, the first movement embodies not merely a principle of musical composition but a broader principle of living systems. The work is constructed as a process in which no element exists in isolation. Each motif inherits material from its predecessor, is transformed into a new form, and in turn becomes the foundation for subsequent development. It is precisely this uninterrupted sequence of inheritance and transformation that gives the music its vitality.
The same principle may be observed in the workings of the natural world. Life is sustained not by isolated parts but by continuous cycles of exchange and mutual support. The human body functions in this manner. Oxygen passes from the lungs into the bloodstream; the blood carries it to every cell where energy is produced, before returning the products of metabolism to continue the cycle. Each stage depends upon the one before it while simultaneously preparing the conditions for the next. No single link exists solely for itself; each both receives from and contributes to the others.
Should one essential link in this cycle be broken, the entire system gradually loses its capacity to sustain itself. Life endures not because its individual parts exist independently, but because an unbroken cycle binds them together into a unified whole.
The first movement of the concerto is organised according to a comparable principle. Melodies do not simply appear and disappear; they become the material from which subsequent motifs are fashioned. These motifs are reshaped through new rhythmic and harmonic contexts before being taken up, expanded and returned by the orchestra to the solo violin. No idea is detached from the larger process. Every element receives material from what precedes it while preparing the conditions for what follows. Through this continual exchange, inheritance and transformation, Mendelssohn creates a musical cycle in which each idea both nourishes and is nourished by the others.
It is perhaps because the movement reflects such a principle that it possesses so natural and compelling a character. Its beauty resides not merely in individual melodies or episodes of development, but in the way every musical element remains connected within a continuous cycle of motion, where each part both receives from and supports the rest, preserving the unity of the whole.
This is the deepest source of the first movement's enduring power. Mendelssohn does not assemble a succession of disconnected ideas; he creates a living organism in which every musical element continually inherits, transforms and sustains the others. It is this unbroken cycle that has endowed the concerto with its lasting vitality and enabled it to continue moving listeners across generations.
Marcos retweeted
“Music is the pleasure the human mind experiences from counting without being aware that it is counting.”
— Gottfried Leibniz
Marcos retweeted
The reaction to SpaceX's IPO shows the forked road of humanity.
The founding of America was established upon the principles of disagreement within the West — individual liberty vs institutional control, exploration vs exploitation, merit vs assignment.
Perhaps SpaceX also inherited the same spirit that once founded the United States of America.




















