Here's something most people are overlooking: Most people think #Bitcoin is leading this market cycle. I don't. I believe $LUNC may be. Let's look at the facts: ⚪️ $LUNC bottomed in December 2025. ⚪️ $LUNC already completed its first EW impulse of this bull market. ⚪️ #BTC, #ETH, #SOL and much of the broader crypto market only bottomed in June 2026. ⚪️ #BTC, #ETH and #SOL are only now completing their bottom formations. If this thesis is correct, then $LUNC isn't following the market... It's leading it by roughly six months. #LUNC #TerraClassic

The $LUNC roadmap is still intact 🛡️ ✅ The 0.5 Fib is proving itself as resistance and holding firm. ✅ The daily candle closes have remained below $0.000075. 🕒 Still patiently waiting for our lower target. It’s hard to stay bearish when the herd is shouting that the bottom is in. However, professional trading doesn't happen based on emotion. It happens based on data. The data hasn't shifted, and so my bias remains 📉😼 I'll let you know if the data changes. #LUNC #TerraClassic

The $LUNC roadmap is executing flawlessly: Golden Pocket bounce ✅ Rejection at $0.000075 🎯✅ The signs are favoured in a certain direction. You know what my view is 😼. What happens next... ?👇 #LUNC #TerraClassic

As expected, $LUNC is printing a local green candle. (Yes, I predicted this move too - sometimes I leave hints in my comment section 😉). Before emotion convinces you the bottom is in, look at the objective data: 📊 1️⃣ The Golden Pocket: Price is reacting exactly off the 0.618 - 0.65 Fib levels with a precise wick to 0.702. Standard technical behavior - local support creates local relief. 2️⃣ The Volume Profile: This bounce is on completely flat, average volume. A macro reversal requires a high-volume capitulation event. 3️⃣ The Retest Trap: Expecting relief to continue up toward the 0.5 Fib at $0.000075 area. This is where the next leg down could start. 4️⃣ The Destination: The high-probability target remains the $0.00005 - $0.00004 demand area. But could the 0.618 bottom be in? Only if the market breaks structure and prints a high-volume daily close back above $0.000085. Until then, my bias stays parked. Sitting on my hands and letting textbook market geometry execute🛡️😼 #LUNC #TerraClassic

Community First LUNC vs. Ninja Node 🥷🏼⚡ Which LUNC validator pays more rewards? Over the past 11 days, I conducted an experiment to verify CFL's claims about paying more rewards than the rest of the LUNC validator set.  CFL encouraged delegates from other validators to redelgate to their validator based on screenshots from Terra Station wallet showing their validator as paying a 3x higher rewards rate compared to the rest of the validator set. This led to a large redelegation movement to CFL. The question is: Did those who redelgated receive more rewards? To answer the question, I staked 10,000,000 $LUNC to Community First LUNC and 10,000,000 $LUNC to Ninja Node 🥷🏼⚡ The results: Staking with Community First LUNC Validator paid: - 19,583 $LUNC - 64 $USTC Staking with @LuncNinjaNode paid: - 20,139 $LUNC - 66 $USTC If you were expecting 3x more rewards from CFL as it was shown on Terra Station - this experiment shows that you recieved virtually the same (slightly less) as compared to staking with other validators. In summary: - Rewards rate on Terra Station is not an indication of the rewards you will receive.  - In reality, rewards rate will be equal across all validators. - Differences in rewards received will be as a result of the individual validator's commission. If you wish to determine the rewards paid by a specific validator, you can use validator.info's LUNC validator section to view the APR for each validator. #LUNCcommunity #LUNC #USTC #TerraClassic

I'm all for it 🔥 Better yet, back $USTC with $aUSDT - a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar but backed by Tether Gold ( $XAUT ).

I've received slightly higher rewards from @LuncNinjaNode. Assuming that my own validator isn't some sort of super extra rewards machine, this shows us is that people should not expect the rewards rate shown on Terra Station. Even if is shows a rewards rate of 3x more than other validators, you're not getting that. If that was the case, then my own validator should not have provided the most staking rewards thus far. If you want to know how much rewards you'll be receiving I think Validator.info shows the most accurate APR % - Ninja Node: 11.62% - Community First LUNC: 11.28% This looks like a more accurate reflection of what has happened.

The #LUNCcommunity has agreed to take a decisive step in the right direction 🎉. Step 1 - Implement #Tax2Gas Step 2 - Implement #Whitelisting module Step 3 - Reignite off-chain burns Step 4 - Hold tight and send it ❤️‍🔥 We've been waiting for this for soooo long. @LuncNinjaNode's roadmap is finally back in action 😼 Not only is this good for @LuncNinjaNode's roadmap, but it will benefit the entire #TerraClassic ecosystem. This is a real catalyst for $LUNC and $USTC which bears the sign of many more good things to come...