"A noble cause may be served by ignoble means." -Captain Arthur Conolly RT is not an Endorsement.
Joined May 2024
- Tweets7K
- Following480
- Followers956
- Likes32.6K
Sigh, the fatigue is real. I know for a fact the loophole in regional filters is deliberate. You can't block Pakis and Kanglus from swarming into Indian Twitter even if you block them independently.
Answer is deep. France is just one part of it. Spain is the next target. Italy is also near critical. Portugal and Belgium are adopting austerity type policies. The Euro is collapsing against the Dollar. So tell me who gains from all this? Who has the most banking institutions?
It's not difficult to see why this guy was fired. If the average babus ego is this big and if they can blatantly lie, manipulate and distort with such confidence to indulge their pettiness, India is definitely beyond screwed.
IMF estimated World real GDP growth at 3.1%; China, India at 4.5% & 7%. Stutians were overjoyed. IMF’s GDP growth in current USD is: World 8.03%; China, India at 9.78% & 3.87%. India is amongst the lowest in world. Be Prabuddha: see full picture. My oped. deccanherald.com/opinion/app…
You know bottom feeders Chinksects are when they have to scrap the bottom of the barrel to bring up 20 year old news. Here's what happen in China in 2019 by the way:
edition.cnn.com/2019/11/27/a…
You know there is a reason why Indians will never trust Chinese. Calling the Chinese snakes would be an insult to snakes.
nehruarchive.in/documents/to…
Switzerland is a retired millionaire they already built their infra. India is a high-growth startup. We MUST borrow to build roads, grids, and ports today so we can profit tomorrow. Freezing debt freezes growth. You grow out of debt by building productive assets, not by stalling.
unavailable
Tell you what should have happened instead:
1. Should have made SVB Patel or LB Shastri PM.
2. Should have accepted UNSC permanent seat.
3. Pass Uniform Civil Code and scrapped any religious institute of priveleges or exceptions.
4. Do labor and land reform immediately.
Chinese hypocrisy is absurd. Someone holds negative views about them it's prejudice; they hold negative views about someone it's because they have studied and carefully observed them:
For someone who once served as India’s Foreign Secretary, describing Chinese people as “trained robots” is not serious analysis. It reveals a deeply ingrained sense of superiority.
Your argument follows a convenient formula: when Indians hold different views of China, it proves independent thinking; when Chinese people share similar criticisms of India, it supposedly proves brainwashing.
Who established that standard? Why should disagreement in India automatically signify intellectual freedom, while agreement among Chinese people must signify intellectual conformity?
Similar opinions do not prove an absence of independent thought, just as disagreement does not automatically prove intellectual freedom. A credible analysis examines why people hold certain views and what evidence informs them. It does not label more than a billion people as robots and then treat that label as a conclusion.
Chinese views of India did not emerge in a vacuum.
Border disputes, a lack of mutual trust, regulatory measures affecting Chinese businesses, and negative narratives about China in parts of Indian public discourse all influence how Chinese people perceive India.
You are perfectly entitled to challenge those perceptions. But bring facts and arguments to the table instead of adopting a condescending attitude and dismissing Chinese people’s views as evidence of intellectual failure.
There is an even more important question: why are Chinese people so often expected to prove they have not been brainwashed, while Indian nationalism, media narratives, and anti-China prejudice are rarely subjected to the same relentless scrutiny?
If independent thinking means reaching only the conclusions approved by Western or Indian elites, then what you are defending is not intellectual freedom but another form of intellectual domination.
Chinese people do not need to oppose their own country to prove they are intelligent. Nor do they need to satisfy the expectations of Indian elites to prove they can think for themselves.
If you genuinely want to understand China, study the lived experiences, historical context, and legitimate concerns of Chinese people.
If all you want is to portray Chinese people as mindless robots, then what you are demonstrating is not a sophisticated understanding of China, but arrogance toward a society you have made little effort to understand.
You are entitled to criticize China, but do not disguise your prejudice as a diagnosis of the Chinese people.
Coping with what? ALL of this has been debunked by the way. The conflict was only halted because of a suspected radioactive leak in Pakistan which was had the Egyptian Air Force fly out a plane loaded with Boron to Kirana hills and US lost its shit and intervened.
Nimmo tai despite her draconian toll on consumers perhaps excels compared to her foreign counterparts in one area: fiscal discipline. The upcoming financial aftershock would be a lot worse otherwise.
These shameless vermin will group themselves with India after they personally come under attack when in actuality they propagated more racism against Indians than anyone else. So no, you Pakis, Kanglus and Sea Kanglus are not with Indians. This is why they use 'South Asia'.
AI reverse engineering is on steroids right now. One of the main reason why your average PC/laptop that was 60-70k INR a year ago is well above 1 lakh INR today. Hardware scarcity is a deliberate move to slow this.
Correct, my problem isn't that China is building 70 fabs. More than likely half of them will never see completion or will likely be absorbed due to overcapacity. My problem is India isn't even keeping 10 fabs as a failsafe base line for such a critical resource.
