Luke Brake retweeted
In this era of artificial intelligence, it is becoming urgent to distinguish human art from what machines produce. There is an ontological difference, even before an aesthetic one, between art and what a machine can generate through statistical calculation based on millions of images created by others. Algorithms lack the spark of humanity. For this reason, the Church wishes to renew an alliance with artists and cultural institutions to safeguard our humanity.
Luke Brake retweeted
Replying to @DiscussingFilm
This will be challenging for the actors to learn (and obviously require subtitles) but would be really cool if he pulls it off. If anyone can, it's Eggers
Luke Brake retweeted
What is happening in English departments right now should concern everyone. We are on the verge of dismantling anthropocentrism and according a mysterious form of pulsating subjecthood to material things. This research must stop until appropriate safeguards are in place
Luke Brake retweeted
“It is easy for me to imagine that the next great division of the world will be between people who wish to live as creatures and people who wish to live as machines.”
-Wendell Berry
Luke Brake retweeted
Wendell Berry, Writer Who Extolled America’s Agrarian Past, Dies at 92 | @nytimes
Luke Brake retweeted
I wrote about why I’m proud @TGC has drawn a line in the sand on AI usage in the writing we publish.
In short: We don’t want AI’s tentacles on any of the written works we publish. thegospelcoalition.org/artic…
"literally nothing deeper than that; it's a personal conceit masquerading as a timeless principle."
LOL he's using it to write his tweets.
If you can't write a tweet without an AI maybe you SHOULD consider becoming a "neo-luddite" or whatever
Most of the "conservative Christian" academics (professors, theologians, etc) see "writing" and becoming a "respected writer" as their only real path to any clout and recognition both within their small bubbles and from the broader world (something they deeply crave as validation).
They all imagine themselves as the next Wendell Berry.
Thus, staking out an aggressive, virtue-signaling, and purist anti-AI stance on "writing" is a necessary response to preserve their idealized dream.
Their celebration of now becoming a "neo-luddite" is literally nothing deeper than that; it's a personal conceit masquerading as a timeless principle.
Despite considerable cultural, financial, and social momentum/support, video games have produced surprisingly few artifacts of moral or aesthetic significance.
There's no way for this not to sound rude, but y'all need to go read an actual poem by a human. This machine poem is awful, and it's embarrassing that you like it.
xitter.cf/emollick/status/206476…
I had this exact experience as well!
Luke Brake retweeted
This will include papers from @SterlingCLife's own Chair of Language and Literature, Dr. @LukeBrake and familiar IFF faces @GCSalter and Elizabeth Jennings, as well as a wonderful reflective paper from Dr. Wilhelm.
Today, at 3pm (CT) some of our presenters from our Spring conference will be reprising their papers for this encore event entitled "Sterling Treasure". All are welcome to join the zoom call whether you want to hear the papers again or for the first time!
facebook.com/share/17RqbYY93…



































