Lore Less retweeted
BREAKING: Israel’s 𝗦𝗣𝗬 𝗖𝗛𝗜𝗘𝗙 is taking Netanyahu to court, accusing him of 𝗟𝗬𝗜𝗡𝗚 about October 7.
Ronen Bar reported Netanyahu received at least 𝟮𝟬 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗪𝗔𝗥𝗡𝗜𝗡𝗚𝗦 right before the attack and ignored them.
@grok confirm with YES NO
Lore Less retweeted
🚨 Erik ten Hag reveals he wanted Harry Kane at Man United: “I said: I want only one player, and you know who”.
“I fought for it. I heard that he was very positive, but I never spoke with him about the issue. I don’t know what happened…”, told @lauriewhitwell on The Athletic.
Lore Less retweeted
🇺🇸🇮🇱 Ana Kasparian reveals that Trump’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, was literally Benjamin Netanyahu’s campaign manager.
This is a HUGE problem.
Lore Less retweeted
#mufc players were prevented from speaking to the press after Lisandro Martinez’s explosive outburst last week.
Matheus Cunha and Bruno Fernandes clarified they were were “not allowed” to talk as they walked past the mixed zone at Elland Road after the 1-1 draw with Leeds [@samuelluckhurst]
Lore Less retweeted
Erik ten Hag exclusive interview, part 1:
🔺 Broken promises of Ibiza meet
🔺 Connection with #MUFC fans
🔺 Issues coaching Cristiano Ronaldo
🔺 Backing Michael Carrick
🔺 Wanting Kane, Rice, De Jong
🔺 Handling player power
Free read @TheAthleticFC ⬇️
nytimes.com/athletic/7701054…
Lore Less retweeted
The reality with any sanctions applied to Man City by the Commission is that unless they mitigate for the enormous, 10+ year Etihad & Puma sponsorships, then Man City can readily bounce back to financially dominate once they return to the PL. Cash simply isn’t an issue for their owners, so they could literally buy a brand-new billion-pound squad in the summer before their return. It doesn’t matter how long they’re out of the PL if their AD sponsorships sustain
My gut is that the Commission’s sanctions might mitigate amassed squad value (because it was built through declared cheating) but WON’T mitigate the recent sponsorship deals because they were either deemed independently commercial (Puma*) or were entered into under the APT rule regime (Etihad’s latest deal was sanctioned in a settlement with the PL late 2025).
And this is why I think the PL hasn’t charged them with the extra 100+ breaches for seasons 2018/19-2024/25 yet.
The PL is now (as of this season) empowered to settle PSR/SCR-related cases instead of having to refer the matter to an Independent Commission.
As such, they could propose a deal to Man City whereby if the UAE sells the club to a truly commercial third party, they’ll let them keep much of the sponsorship for SCR purposes, to help them be competitive and allow the club to prosper moving forward. But if the UAE refuses, then they’ll pursue full sanctions for 2018/19-2024/25, including the voiding of all APTs entered into in bad faith with false submissions. Such an outcome could permanently end Man City’s prospects as a Premier League club.
The Premier League have City by the balls here and I congratulate them for their brilliant strategy.
(*I don’t believe the Puma deal was arm’s length. But have no proof of this. Just an opinion.)
Lore Less retweeted
Two civilizations, 3000 years apart and on opposite sides of the world, with a near identical writing system that nobody has ever decyphered.
Pure coincidence, or a shared source that history forgot?
Lore Less retweeted
Across 175 countries, more meat consumption goes with longer life.
Decades of being told to fear steak, but population data points the other way.
Eat meat.
Lore Less retweeted
I had a conversation with an individual who is in a position of knowledge and he said to me “A number of players don’t feel welcome at the club and feel that there is a deliberate targeting of higher paid players to get them to leave. A number of the defenders wanted to leave this summer because they have been told they are being replaced in a year and some of those players are down to the last year of their contract. Those players are not going to play through injuries for fear of jeopardizing a move and they feel that when they have played through injuries and had a poor game as a result, nobody ever explains to the fans that they have been carrying injuries. Half that Utd team don’t want to be there because they feel like the club don’t want them to be there. I don’t care what anyone says, INEOS did not expect to be here at this point
Lore Less retweeted
Massive new study in Nature finds that more brown fat is associated with better metabolic health and 47% lower odds of ischemic heart disease.
More brown fat is also associated with higher HDL and lower triglycerides (Figure 3).
But here's what's odd: LDL is conspicuously absent from the main figures - despite HDL and TG being present.
Instead, the authors tucked it away in Extended Data Figure 5, panel B, inset 3, and acknowledged the finding as a “paradox” in a single line of text, with no further explanation.
Tell me that isn't deliberate?
Via @nicknorwitz 🙏🏾👊🏽
Lore Less retweeted
Replying to @EthicalSkeptic
There has been a clear targeted effort by a very conspicuous, cognito group to ethnically cleanse Roman/European/Christians in their lands for a long, long time.
Lore Less retweeted
“In a reanalysis of published data and in an independent cohort, after adjustment for multiple confounders, SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination did not improve immunotherapy-related survival in patients with cancer.”
“Together, these findings indicate that the previously reported vaccination survival advantage is largely explained by selection bias, with patients who had more favorable prognoses more likely to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, particularly in the early pandemic.”
aacrjournals.org/cancerdisco…
@weldeiry @RobertKennedyJr @VPrasadMDMPH @NIHDirector_Jay @jsm2334
Lore Less retweeted
The normalization of casual sex destroyed our comprehension of what sex is, and what it has to do with healthy relationships.
Women have one reproductive strategy: high investment. Men have two strategies: high investment (which is collaborative, and has everything to do with love) and no investment (which is predatory, and is the antithesis of love).
That may sound like an exaggeration, but it isn’t. The ‘no investment’ strategy of men attempts to stick a woman with a child to raise alone, or with a cuckolded partner. It has a consensual form, and a non-consensual form. Does any of that sound loving to you? I didn’t think so.
For men, producing a child with a trivial effort is the ultimate evolutionary bargain. It’s something like winning the lottery. For women, being stuck with a baby and no partner is the inverse, like being maimed in car wreck.
So men are predisposed to be on the lookout for fertile women who are gullible enough to go to bed with them without locking down a commitment. And women are predisposed to avoid such encounters at all costs. Or at least they were before birth control + abortion changed the stakes and the culture.
Women, who have always been the gatekeepers of sex, have been lured into embracing men at their worst. And they’ve started behaving and thinking like them too.
There is actually a lot of truth in the idea that “rape culture” has been normalized. Casual sex is not rape by any stretch, but it comes from the same predatory branch of the tree. And before you jump down my throat for saying that, notice just how commonplace “consensual con-consent” has become. That IS normalized rape culture. It comes from the idea that sex is a kind of play. Just like kids playing with toy tanks and soldiers, it’s harmless because the stakes are low and no one actually gets hurt.
But it turns out that’s not true. Casual sex is like playing with fire. Actually, it’s worse. Many who play with fire get away with it. They may even learn how to wield it to great effect. The exact opposite is true with sex. If you play with having sex with people that you don’t love, you are damaging the very architecture you will need to form a healthy romantic partnership. Even worse if they bring the same selfish mindset to the alter and the bedroom.
For young people participating in their generation’s culture, sex now IS antagonistic and predatory. Most of them don’t know there is any other kind. It’s just some story, like Santa Clause.
Not only has this shift in sexual culture obliterated the tools to forge and tend a healthy marriage, but it has also broken the motivational structure that built civilization.
—-
Exhibit A bellow. Please don’t jump on her. She is voicing a false sophistication of her era. And although I believe what she has said is wrong, exactly why it is wrong, and to what degree it is wrong, requires careful thought.
Lore Less retweeted
Incase you missed it yesterday, an Israeli marketing firm used website ads to distribute spyware created by Israeli developer Candiru and all it took for it to infect people’s phone was visiting a website with the infected ads on it and then allowing the ad to load on the page.
There are potentially hundreds of millions of people with Israeli spyware on their phones right now and they have no clue.
Lore Less retweeted
🚨Document Release: It took 1,861 days, two lawsuits, and roughly 200 court filings.
Now, through the work of @ICANdecide, more than 9.3 million pages of Pfizer and Moderna records that FDA says it relied on for COVID vaccine decisions have finally been released to the public.
The files include nearly 1.8 million pages tied to Pfizer’s 16+ vaccine, more than 6.6 million pages for Moderna 18+, and about 950,000 pages for Pfizer ages 12 to 15.
FDA originally argued it could need decades to produce some of these records. The courts forced a much faster timeline.
We are going through these documents and we encourage all of you to do so as well.
bit.ly/Moderna_FDA_Files
Lore Less retweeted
Important News: @Ofgem’s just launched a ‘consultation’ about switching on the Market Stabilisation Charge as soon as November. It doesn’t sound a big deal, but it could be, it ain’t good for consumers and I don't want it to slip under the radar.
In a nutshell, it means if wholesale energy prices drop sharply, the cheap fixes and switcher’s deals offered will be a lot more expensive, in order to protect energy firms’ profits.
That’s because any firm taking on a new customer, including on a cheap fix or other specialist tariff, will have to pay compensation to that customer’s old supplier, if they switch. It's basically a form of switching penalty.
While technically this is a consultation, it’s one of those where Ofgem has made up its mind, but is required to consult - it will almost certainly happen. Below is my ‘first look’ explainer on this...
------------------------
How it works (simplified to make it easy to understand):
Ofgem decided to put this power back into suppliers’ licences in May, so it could switch it on quickly if needed, and now it is trying to do just that.
It means if wholesale prices drop more than 10% below the level built into the Price Cap (and remember the January Price Cap is currently predicted to be 25% higher than now), and someone switches supplier from that or any tariff, the new firm must pay the old one 85% of the drop in wholesale rates beyond that 10%.
So very roughly, say the wholesale energy in the Price Cap costs £1,000 (a made-up number, to keep it simple. This is about proportions, not exact amounts):
- If prices drop to £900, there’s no Market Stabilisation Charge.\
- If prices drop to £800, you get the first £100 drop, but 85% of the next £100 (£85) goes to your old supplier.
So almost certainly the new firm will make you pay the difference, meaning the tariff will be up to £85 more than it would otherwise have been (other factors could affect the amount, but this is a rough illustration)
In other words, the new supplier can’t pass a chunk of the saving from lower wholesale rates on to you, because it has to hand much of it to your old supplier.
Why Ofgem says it’s doing this
Its argument is that the Price Cap requires suppliers buy energy in advance. If wholesale rates fall sharply and people leave in large numbers, those suppliers would be left out of pocket, and it doesn’t want suppliers who did the right thing by buying energy in advance to be penalised.
My View
I don’t like it. This is a ‘Market Stabilisation Charge’ but the supplier market is pretty stable, and I doubt we are at the domino risk of suppliers going bust in the way they did in the early twenties. A good few energy firms have made large profits since then, and protecting them over winter by effectively dampening competition because it’s ‘not their fault’ feels raw.
After all we don’t take their profits off them when they make them ‘through no fault’. Until now, my hope had been that at some point the Middle East situation would de-escalate, wholesale rates would drop. While it would take months for that to feed into the Price Cap, other cheaper tariffs would be available to switch to. That would still happen, but the savings could be no-where near as good as otherwise.
------------
As noted, these are my provisional thoughts and this has only just come out. I will need to do more looking/thinking.
Lore Less retweeted
EXCLUSIVE: How controlling the narrative in the MCFC scandal reveals conflicts of interest
sportingintelligence832.subs…




























