Lowieck retweeted
The world spent years funding, enabling and propping up a terror regime in Gaza—one that embedded itself among civilians and exploited them as human shields.
Much of the media then amplified Hamas’s propaganda, strengthening the very narrative Hamas relies on to maintain power and sacrifice its own civilians for political gain.
And now that same media has the audacity to blame Kushner for not fixing the catastrophe quickly enough—while continuing to fuel the propaganda that makes peace harder to achieve.
If I were Kushner, I would have told this reporter exactly where he could take that question. Kudos to Kushner for calmly dismantling it with far more diplomacy than it deserved.
Lowieck retweeted
I grow infinitely tired of the first sentence here. I don't know what goes on with the Candace situation, I don't watch podcasts. With that in mind, let me offer you all some sense.
In America, you are innocent until proven guilty. End of story. Anyone making the statement this idiot just made needs to reflect. And yes, it's idiotic, so spare me the self righteous virtue signaling. You do not condemn someone to guilt before seeing the evidence and going through a thorough process to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is a human right. So, Kristan, I know you find logic and consequence challenging, evidenced by your failure as a pro life advocate, but bear with me here.
When a high profile political and religious figure, of which Charlie was both, is assassinated, no stone can be left unturned. Everyone close to him, every business relationship, every random quack letter with a threat, EVERYTHING must be investigated.
When this much money, power, and influence are involved, those closest must be met with ultimate scrutiny. Not as accusation, but as thorough investigation.
I find it ridiculous that such common sense must be stated.
As far as the ever obvious clown show arguments, let's put something to bed.
I don't trust our government. I don't trust any other government. When the most influential evangelical Christian on the planet is bankrolled by Jewish influence, which is a completely opposed theology, openly states that Israel is ethnically cleansing GAZA, as in, openly makes accusations of genocide, against the opposing religious influence that bankrolls his existence, one must factor this in. When donors, funding operatives, and world leaders are in the DMs, one must take that into account.
I am not saying Israel killed Charlie. I literally have no idea. I am saying how on earth can you rule any involvement out? Even secondary involvement. You think this is so irrelevant that it doesn't merit investigation? You think screeching "conspiracy" makes you sound rational or well intentioned? It doesn't. It makes you sound like a tone deaf sycophant with no desire for truth. And oppressive, thought policing tyrant.
I also believe that Erika Kirk has acted EXTRAORDINARILY strange in the wake of Charlie's death. Does that mean she killed him? No. Does that even mean something is off? No. People act weird all the time. What it does mean, is taking videos of Charlie in a casket and posting to social media is odd. The interviews are odd, the mannerisms are odd. The behavior is all odd, and there are odd things in the history. And that should ALL be taken into consideration. Again, on what planet is having eyes and ears and opinions on behavior some sort of thought crime?
Again, I haven't even spoken about this topic, and I have no clue who killed Kirk, and indeed I hold no position on it, but I find the shaping of narratives and the silencing of dissent, and the "mis and disinformation" campaigns akin to... COVID? Are you people are completely lost?
Given that this is the biggest political assassination since Kennedy, maybe people should stop being retards and look at the whole picture.
Is it possible some random transgender freak pulled off the greatest hit of our lifetimes? Sure. Is it likely, given the circumstances? Not at all. Trust your government at your own peril.
If you are incapable of having conversations on this topic, maybe sit at the children's table this Thanksgiving.
In closing, you will likely never know who killed Kirk. But someone will fall.
“I think that is the simplest way to describe great books. They are difficult because they contain more life than we are used to processing. They demand more attention than our culture trains us to give.
And that leaves us with an uncomfortable question.
If deep reading is one of the skills that creates clear thinking… what happens to a civilization when most people can no longer do it?”
open.substack.com/pub/cultur…
Lowieck retweeted
Social media trends have turned the world’s most beautiful places into endless bathroom lines at a concert, where everyone waits for hours just to take the same photo to show to people who couldn’t care less 🌎📸
Nothing captures the shallow decay of our time better than this
Lowieck retweeted
"There's a storm coming, Mr.
Wayne. You and your friends better batten down the hatches.
Because when it hits, you're all gonna wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us"
-CATWOMAN
Into each life, a little rain must fall. Quite a bit has fallen in mine, enough to leave the heart melancholy and turn the soul toward the blues.
The blues is the music of those who have lived through life’s rises and falls, faced their challenges, and kept going despite hardship.
The blues is the music of those who have transformed life’s curves into experience, wisdom, and intelligence.
Chuck Berry Live Rocking Horse at BBC Theatre - 1972
@ChuckBerry #blues @BBC
Lowieck retweeted
A philosophical discourse between Nietzsche and Dostoyevsky on Christ and the power of mercy.. incredible!
Watch until the end.. Is mercy a weakness then?
Awesome concept from Kopfkino.l
Lowieck retweeted
It's now happening. The existing fiat monetary order, the domestic political order, and the international geopolitical order are all breaking down, so we are at the brink of wars. It all is happening because of the Big Cycle that is driven by the five big forces I've described repeatedly and laid out in detail in my book and the linked video (tr.ee/cZvSuv) titled Principles for Dealing with The Changing World Order. Do you understand the Big Cycle and do you know how to deal with it? I'd like to help you. I will continue to share with you my understanding of how the mechanics work and how I see things transpiring. If you want me to send you my postings, you can sign up below.
Lowieck retweeted
TODD passionnant . Pourquoi avoir créé des générations entières de citoyens suréduqués, pour que au bout du compte, une pseudo-élite, souvent médiocre, finisse pas censurer les citoyens éclairés à l’esprit critique affuté ?
youtube.com/watch?v=2iM9U8fC…
Lowieck retweeted
"I don't have time to go to the gym"
A kettlebell is all you need to get lean and strong.
Here are my top 10 kettlebell exercises you can do in 10 minutes from anywhere (bookmark this) 🧵
1. The Halo
Lowieck retweeted
Envoyez nous en commentaires votre top 5 de nos interviews et pourquoi en quelques mots.
Lowieck retweeted
Venezuela 🇻🇪 - Pétrole
(Temps de lecture 4 min)
🔸Le pétrole vénézuélien, tout le monde en parle. Je vais vous en parler... Peut-être mieux.
Il faut savoir d'entrée qu'il y a un sérieux problème (même plusieurs) avec ce pétrole vénézuélien qui provient principalement de la ceinture de l'Orénoque (Faja Petrolífera del Orinoco).
Ce pétrole c'est du "brut extra-lourd". Sa densité API (c'est l'échelle de densité de l'American Petroleum Institute) est généralement inférieure à 10° (l'eau étant à 10°, un pétrole classique "léger" se situe entre 35° et 45° API). + le degré API est bas, plus le brut est dense et visqueux. Le vénézuélien est très visqueux et c'est pas ouf, on va le voir.
En + le pétrole vénézuélien contient aussi une teneur en soufre très élevée (jusqu'à 3-5%) ce qui le classe comme "acide".
Bon, le pétrole, c'est de la biodégradation bactérienne. Les hydrocarbures légers ont été progressivement "mangés" par des micro-organismes sur des millions d'années, la géologie c'est long, ce qui ne laisse que les composés lourds riches en asphaltènes, en résines et en métaux (du vanadium et du nickel).
Bref, on s'en fout un peu mais c'est pour donner un peu de contexte à "c'est quoi du pétrole".
Pourquoi le pétrole vénézuélien est foireux ?
• D'abord à cause de sa viscosité : à température ambiante, ce pétrole est presque solide, comme du bitume. Et pour l'extraire... Ça va nécessiter de l'injection de vapeur ou de diluants.En + la proportion de produits valorisables (essence, diesel) est plus faible qu'avec un brut léger.
• Son coût de raffinage est élevé et le traitement requiert des unités de conversion lourde (appelées cokers et hydrocrackers) hyper coûteuses en capital et en énergie.
• Je vous ai dit au-dessus que ce pétrole avait une teneur en soufre très élevé, évidemment que ça provoque une grosse corrosion des équipements de raffinage.
• Il est beaucoup + polluants mais surtout c'est le transport qui est chiant : il faut le diluer avec des bruts légers ou le chauffer pour le pomper dans les pipelines.
Alors s'il est si pourri ce pétrole, pourquoi Trump s'y jette dessus et le veut absolument ?
La suite en-dessous ⤵️
Lowieck retweeted
1/ The Crans-Montana incident isn’t a “lack of regulation” story. It’s a peak high–time-preference story.
Lowieck retweeted
LE COLBERTISME : Le modèle économique français qu'on vous a fait oublier
Dans cet extrait essentiel, Bertrand Dutheil de la Rochère nous rappelle une vérité historique FONDAMENTALE : quand la France était une puissance économique, elle était COLBERTISTE.
LE CONSTAT HISTORIQUE IMPLACABLE
"Lorsque la France a été une puissance économique, on s'aperçoit qu'elle a été colbertiste"
✅ Louis XIV avec Colbert (1661-1683) → La France devient la première puissance économique européenne
✅ Napoléon (1799-1815) → Empire industriel et commercial français
✅ Les Trente Glorieuses (1945-1975) → Reconstruction gaulliste, croissance exceptionnelle
✅ Le programme du CNR → Industries nationalisées, Sécurité sociale
QU'EST-CE QUE LE COLBERTISME ?
"Il y avait bien sûr un secteur public, un secteur d'État, l'État était là pour impulser et entraîner l'économie. Et dans toutes les activités où la concurrence pouvait fonctionner, était profitable, il y avait de la concurrence"
Le colbertisme, ce n'est NI le tout-État soviétique, NI le tout-marché anglo-saxon.
LES PILIERS DU COLBERTISME :
1️⃣ L'ÉTAT STRATÈGE (pas spectateur)
L'État n'est pas un simple "arbitre" qui laisse faire le marché.
L'État :
→ IMPULSE l'économie (investissements massifs)
→ ORIENTE les secteurs stratégiques (énergie, défense, transports)
→ PLANIFIE le développement (vision long terme)
→ ENTRAÎNE les entreprises privées par l'exemple public
C'est l'État de Colbert, de Napoléon, de De Gaulle.
2️⃣ UN SECTEUR PUBLIC FORT
Pourquoi ?
→ Pour garantir l'INDÉPENDANCE NATIONALE (on ne dépend pas de l'étranger)
→ Pour investir là où le privé ne va pas (trop long, trop risqué, pas assez rentable immédiatement)
→ Pour tirer l'ensemble de l'économie vers le haut
→ Pour protéger les secteurs stratégiques de la spéculation
Exemples historiques :
Manufactures royales sous Colbert
Chemins de fer, électricité, gaz sous les Trente Glorieuses
Aérospatiale, nucléaire, télécoms sous De Gaulle
3️⃣ LA CONCURRENCE ENCADRÉE (pas dogmatique)
💬 "La concurrence, c'est bien, à condition que ça ne remette pas en cause l'indépendance de l'État et à condition que la concurrence se passe sur le produit et pas sur le producteur"
Le colbertisme dit OUI à la concurrence :
✅ Sur la qualité des produits
✅ Sur l'innovation
✅ Sur le service
✅ Là où elle est PROFITABLE pour la nation
Le colbertisme dit NON à la concurrence :
❌ Qui menace l'indépendance nationale
❌ Sur le dos des travailleurs (dumping social)
❌ Qui détruit les secteurs stratégiques
❌ Qui sert les intérêts étrangers
4️⃣ PROTECTION DE LA SOUVERAINETÉ
💬 "À condition que ça ne remette pas en cause l'indépendance de l'État"
PRINCIPE ABSOLU : L'économie sert la NATION, pas l'inverse.
→ Les secteurs stratégiques sont protégés
→ L'indépendance énergétique, alimentaire, militaire est garantie
→ On ne bradé pas nos fleurons nationaux
→ On ne sacrifie pas notre industrie sur l'autel du "libre-échange"
Années 1980-1990 : Le grand tournant
Nos élites ont :
❌ Adopté le modèle néolibéral anglo-saxon
❌ Privatisé nos fleurons (souvent bradés à l'étranger)
❌ Abandonné la planification stratégique
❌ Soumis la France aux "règles du marché"
❌ Accepté la désindustrialisation comme "inévitable"
Résultat :
→ Perte d'indépendance (énergétique, industrielle, technologique)
→ Désindustrialisation massive
→ Chômage de masse
→ Précarisation du travail
→ Dette explosive
→ Dépendance à l'Allemagne et aux États-Unis
📖 Découvrez l'analyse complète dans le livre : cerclearistote.fr/produit/li…
🎥 Interview complète : youtube.com/watch?v=cYhPBgb2…
Partagez massivement pour rappeler ce qu'est le VRAI modèle français ! 🔥
#Colbertisme #France #Économie #Souveraineté #ModèleFrançais #Colbert #État #Gaullisme #Indépendance #CercleAristote #BertrandDutheilsance économique, elle était COLBERTISTE.
Lowieck retweeted
🇫🇷 BRIGITTE BARDOT DEAD AT 91- FRANCE PROSECUTED ITS MOST FAMOUS ACTRESS 6 TIMES FOR CRITICIZING IMMIGRATION
Brigitte Bardot - the face of French cinema in the 1960s, international sex symbol, and cultural icon - spent the last 30 years of her life being repeatedly convicted by the French government for speech crimes.
She faced 6 convictions between 1997 and 2008. Not for violence. Not for incitement. For criticizing mass immigration and Islamism. France prosecuted its own legend for expressing opinions the state deemed unacceptable.
Think about that timeline. Bardot was 63 in 1997 when the convictions started. She had already retired from cinema for decades, dedicated her life to animal rights activism.
Then she started speaking about immigration and Islam. The French state responded with criminal charges. 6 times. Fines totaling thousands of euros. Convicted under France's laws prohibiting "incitement to racial hatred."
What she actually said varied - criticism of halal slaughter practices, concerns about Muslim immigration, opposition to mosque construction.
Each time, speech. Each time, prosecution. Each time, conviction. France took its most internationally recognized cultural figure and turned her into a criminal for having wrong opinions.
The irony is suffocating. France - birthplace of Enlightenment values, "liberté" literally in the national motto - spent years prosecuting an elderly actress for speech.
Meanwhile, Bardot kept talking. Each conviction made her more defiant. She never recanted. Never apologized. Just kept saying what she thought while the French state kept fining her.
The prosecutions revealed a stark truth: France doesn't have free speech. It has permitted speech. Step outside permitted parameters on immigration or Islam, expect criminal charges.
It didn't matter if you were nobody or Brigitte Bardot. Actually, prosecuting Bardot made the point stronger. If even she isn't protected, nobody is.
She lived 91 years, won international acclaim, and became a cultural phenomenon. Then she spent her final decades being prosecuted by her own government for opinions.
That's her obituary: movie star, icon, criminal - for speech. France cannot claim to value free expression while criminalizing its most famous citizens for exercising it.
Bardot died knowing France chose prosecuting her over defending her right to speak. That is the legacy France earned.
Source: French court records, @visegrad24
