WHO SILENCED DR DAVID KELLY Most people scrolling past this have never heard the name Dr David Kelly. They should. He was one of the world's leading weapons inspectors, a quiet Ministry of Defence scientist who spent years checking Iraq's chemical and biological arsenal for the United Nations. Nobody understood that file better than he did. In 2003 Tony Blair's (@InstituteGC) government published a dossier claiming Saddam Hussein could deploy chemical weapons within 45 minutes. That one line helped justify sending Britain to war, a war that ended up killing hundreds of thousands of people. Kelly knew the intelligence behind that claim had been stretched. He said so privately, off the record, to BBC (@BBCNews) journalist Andrew Gilligan (@mragilligan). Nothing more than a conversation. Somebody in government made sure his name reached the press anyway. Within days a respected scientist with decades of service was dragged in front of 2 parliamentary committees and questioned like a suspect on live television. His wife later said he came home a broken man. On 17 July 2003 he left his house in Oxfordshire for a walk. He was 59. He never came home. His body was found the next morning in nearby woodland, a knife beside him and a shallow cut to his wrist. Now here is where the story stops making sense. Instead of letting the standard coroner's inquest run its course, Tony Blair's government suspended it before it properly began and replaced it with a private inquiry led by a judge the government appointed, Lord Hutton. It was never resumed. To this day Dr David Kelly is the only person in England and Wales in living memory to die in unexplained circumstances without a full coroner's inquest ever taking place. Hutton concluded suicide within months. Officially, that was that. Unofficially, a group of senior doctors reviewed the medical evidence and said the conclusion was unsafe. In letters to The Times (@thetimes) and The Guardian (@guardian) they explained that the artery involved is so small that cutting it rarely causes fatal blood loss in a healthy person, that the painkiller level found in his body was well under a lethal dose, and that the amount of blood at the scene was too small to account for the death recorded. In 2011 those doctors formally asked the government to finally allow a proper inquest. Attorney General Dominic Grieve (@dominicgrieve_) reviewed it and refused. Hutton's inquiry was declared sufficient. The matter was closed, again, by the people who opened it. Think about what actually happened here. A civil servant quietly raised concerns about the most consequential political deception in modern British history. He was exposed, humiliated and found dead days later, and the same government that needed answers made sure a proper, independent investigation never happened. Tony Blair went on to become a Middle East peace envoy. He was later knighted. Dr David Kelly got a rushed private inquiry, a sealed post mortem report kept from public view for years, and a grave that campaigners are still fighting over more than 2 decades on. Nobody has ever been held accountable. Not for the dossier, not for the leak, not for what happened next. This story deserves to be told every single year, not forgotten. If you think that too, share it. Sources @BBCNews @guardian @thetimes @PrivateEyeNews

Who are the people being escorted into Britain by the UK lifeboat services under the protection of UK police forces and housed in UK hotels paid for by the UK taxpayer, and why are they being brought here? Let’s start with how many of them are coming. • As of August this year, 16,391 people have crossed the English Channel or arrived by other routes to Britain illegally. • In 2025, 41,472 people came to Britain illegally by the same routes. • In 2024, it was 36,816 people. • In 2023 it was 29,437 people. • In 2022 it was 45,755, the highest number since figures first began to be collected in 2018. • In 2021, when the invasion of Britain, not only across the English channel but through UK airports, began in earnest, it was 28,526 people In the nearly 9 years since 2018, therefore, 209,024 people have come to Britain illegally. To get a cross-section of where these illegal immigrants are coming from at any one time, in the 12 months to June 2025, Afghanis made up the largest number of illegal arrivals (6,360), followed by Eritreans (5,975), Iranians (4,322), Syrians (3,935), Sudanese (3,770), Vietnamese (2,424), Somalians (2,211), Yemeni (2,194), Iraqis (1,900) and Turks (1,543), with a further 7,812 from other countries (Albania, Kuwait, etc.) and 863 unidentified or not recorded. With the exception of Vietnam, these are all Muslim countries. Over the same period 12-month period, 111,984 illegal immigrants claimed asylum in the UK. In the previous 12 months it was 99,700. One of the questions our government and media has avoided answering is why — if these are refugees — 83% of these illegal immigrants are male, and 67% are between 25 and 39 years old, or what has come to be called ‘fighting age’. As with legal immigration to the UK, these figures have increased dramatically since 2021, with 39,124 people crossing the English Channel illegally between 2018 and 2021. And yet, once again, 87.4% of these were male, and 75% were between 19 and 39 years old. In Somalia, the average number of children per woman is 6.01. In Afghanistan it is 4.84 children. In Yemen it is 4.5. In Sudan it is 4.13. In Eritrea it is 3.58. In Iraq it is 3.33. In Syria it is 2.7. And in Iraq, Yemen and Syria, under the barbarisms of Sharia law, men can have up to four wives; so each of the men invading Britain could have over a dozen children they have abandoned in their home country. The other question unanswered by our government and media is why, if these are refugees who have fled war in their home countries, they have travelled through numerous Muslim countries that are not at war, including Pakistan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, etc., and the entire length and breadth of Europe to get to Britain, a non-Muslim country? According to the UK Government, this Sunday, 6 September, 2026, 624 illegal immigrants landed in Britain in 8 boats, but the number of men invading us in a single day has been far higher. Exactly a year ago, on 6 September, 2025, 1,101 immigrants crossed into Britain illegally on small boats from Calais, which was the highest number in a single day in 2025. Even that, though, wasn’t the highest number ever, which occurred on 3 September, 2022, when 1,305 immigrants crossed into Britain illegally. However — and this is what the media’s focus on so-called ‘small-boat’ crossings has obscured in the perception of the British public — even if this number of invaders, the highest ever in a single day, arrived every day of the year (making 476,325 illegal arrivals) it would still be only a half of how many are arriving here legally, not on the beaches of Dover and Portsmouth but through the airports of Heathrow, Birmingham, Manchester and Bradford. And in actual fact, the highest annual number of illegal crossings was 45,755 in 2022 — although that was closely rivalled last year, when 41,472 crossed into Britain. Net legal migration from non-EU countries in 2023, the highest number so far in a single year, was 1,005,000. That’s 2,753 economic migrants from non-EU countries, overwhelmingly from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, settling in Britain every day of the year, Monday to Sunday, day after day, 19,326 every week. Even in 2025, when net migration from outside the EU dropped to 350,000, the lowest it’s been since 2020, there were 959 economic immigrants settling in Britain every day of the year, nearly as many as the highest number of illegal immigrants (1,101) ever to arrive in a single day. They overwhelmingly come from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria and Ghana, none of which are at war. In reality, however, to differentiate these two means of invasion as ‘legal’ and ‘illegal’ is inaccurate, because it is clear that, with a navy, army, air force and special services at its disposal, if the UK Government wanted to stop the ‘illegal’ arrivals they could do so. Instead, not only are our lifeboat services, as we saw this weekend, escorting these fake asylum seekers to our shores, but the Government is then conveying them by coaches — usually, as we saw this weekend, under the cover of night — to hotels and other accommodation paid for by the British taxpayer. Here they are given free pocket money, three cooked-meals a day, free medical care, free access to doctors and dentistry and other benefits that an increasing number of the British people cannot afford to pay for or to which, with the increased burden on our defunded state services caused by the burden of millions of immigrants, we cannot gain access. In contrast to these luxuries paid for by the British taxpayer, the average time for a Briton waiting for a council home in London is 27 years, and the average time across England is 7 years. In August 2025, there were 6.24 million Britons waiting for consultant-led care by the National Health Service; with the average waiting time 13.4 weeks, around 2.82 million waiting for over 18 weeks, and 180,300 waiting more than a year. In contrast, the NHS has accepted multi-million-pound contracts from the UK Government to send doctors on home visits to hotels housing illegal immigrants. For the Britons whose taxes pay for these visits, there are 13 million people in England — 28% of the adult population — waiting to see a dentist, including 5.6 million people who tried and failed to get an appointment in the past 2 years; 5.4 million who didn’t try because they thought they wouldn’t get one; and 1.25 million who were put off by the cost. In total, there are about 780,000 people on waiting lists for an NHS dentist. Finally, while illegal immigrants who have contributed, and will contribute, nothing to the GDP of the UK are receiving three cooked-meals a day, in 2024/25 there were 2.89 million emergency food parcels distributed to 4% of the entire population of Britain, of which 1.02 million went to children. In 2023, at the height of the invasion, illegal immigrants housed in UK hotels were costing the British taxpayer over £8 million a day, or nearly £3 billion per year. In 2025 the cost dropped to 5.77 million a day and 2.1 billion a year. And of the 171,200 illegal immigrants to Britain who had been granted ‘refugee’ status by December 2024, 112,500, 66%, were claiming Universal Credit benefits, all paid for by the British taxpayer. The widely-parroted claim, therefore, that the collapse of Britain’s public services has nothing to do with illegal immigrants arriving in Britain by small boat is not corroborated by the facts; but is, in fact, a Left-wing myth disseminated by the ideologues of replacement immigration, both the woke-Left and Muslims. In reality, the men landing unopposed on our shores are refugees in name only, yet they are lavished with every luxury the UK Government can wring out of the impoverished British taxpayer. Once stationed across Britain, they are free to rape our women and children with impunity and to assault and murder our men while we, as we saw this weekend, are arrested by our own police forces for trying to stop them or daring even to protest against the invasion of our country. So what, then, have these 200,000 fighting-age Muslim men been brought here at such immense cost to the British people to do? Given their age, gender, religion, countries of origin, what in many cases appears to be their military training, and their treatment in Britain, it is clear that they have been brought here for a very different reason than the economic migrants. It was only thanks to a data leak that we learned last year that 24,000 Afghani soldiers have been secretly resettled in Britain. Is it so unlikely that the other so-called ‘refugees’ are any different? In effect — and, I believe, in intention — this is a Muslim army of ‘irregular’ troops stationed across Britain in military barracks emptied of British troops, as they have been in Piddington, Crowborough, Bicester, Barnham, Napier, Wethersfield, Inverness and numerous other military sites. I cannot see any other reason for their presence here, therefore, other than to enforce the Islamisation of Britain by acting as a trained militia in the event of a mass uprising of the British people against the invasion and conquest of our country. It’s an already observable phenomenon that almost every security guard in every public and privately-owned building in Britain is a foreign national; and although their origins and nationality are impossible to determine, I would guess that they have been placed in such positions by the same organisations and companies that sponsored their transportation here as unskilled, low-paid workers on Migrant Workers Programmes. The same thing is happening in our police forces, which on the excuse of meeting extra-legal Equity, Diversity and Inclusion quotas have for some time now been openly advertising positions exclusively for candidates from so-called ‘ethnic minorities’, even if that means, as we discovered earlier this year, recruiting African child rapists. The same is happening in our security services, which this year advertised internships exclusively for non-White candidates. Behind its woke vocabulary, this is a programme for the recruitment of hostile foreigners with no allegiance to the British people into positions of authority over the British people. This is being implemented in our government, parliament, civil service, secret services, law courts, police forces, city halls, councils and every other public institution in the UK. What we witnessed on the beaches of Dover and Portsmouth this weekend is only the midway point of a programme for the demographic replacement of the British people in our homeland that continues long after these invaders land and whose goal is the conquest of Britain. Britain is already an occupied country under foreign control; and unless we rise up now and overthrow this government, parliament, civil service, police force and the deep state of Islamic organisations that are overseeing the Islamisation of Britain, one day soon we will find ourselves hostages in our own country. architectsforsocialhousing.c…

So French 'rescue' vessels made sure they got to British waters safely RNLI went to actually 'rescue' them & in that time, look what was set up Landing area, marquees to process them, ambulances, medics, coaches sat ready and police from across the region Who coordinated this?

🚨 Extraordinary news about Piddington - the village of 350 people upon whom Andy Burnham is dumping 1250 illegal migrant men. Turns out it’s not 1,250. It’s 3,510. Yes. The Express has got hold of an official risk assessment that reveals they’re preparing for 3,510. That’s 10 illegal migrant men for every Piddington resident. This is one of the most insane attacks on a British village in recent memory. And it’s coming from our OWN GOVERNMENT. British people are being overwhelmed. When I visited the rural village of Piddington, a mother told me she and her daughter were taking self defence classes. A father told me his daughter’s childhood was “over”. And that was when it was 1,250. Just imagine how they feel now. Andy Burnham is dumping illegal migrants onto British people. Enough is enough. Reform will stop the invasion of Britain.

The RNLI is not a charity. It is a maritime trafficking operation with a donation tin and a government lawyer for a chair. You believed the yellow jerseys. You believed the volunteers. You believed your pennies were saving fishermen. They were funding something else entirely. Meet Janet Legrand. Chair since 2023. Not a captain. Not a coxswain. A senior partner at DLA Piper who built her career representing governments in international disputes. Trinity Hall Cambridge. OBE. The Children’s Society. Every credential screams globalist bureaucrat. None scream rescue. She is not there to save drowning Britons. She is there to manage cross-border legalities while her organization ferries illegal migrants to your shores. The governance structure is a closed loop of insider control. Council appoints Trustees. Trustees appoint Executives. Executives run operations. No external oversight. No independent review. A self-perpetuating machine that selects its own leadership, sets its own strategy, and answers to nobody but the mirror. They tell you 7,800 volunteers serve the coast. The accounts tell a different story. £93.5 million on salaries and pensions. 58.6 percent of total spending. The CEO pockets £189,000, more than the Prime Minister. These are not volunteers. These are paid operatives carrying out a mission. The volunteer myth exists to suppress wages, evade labor laws, and keep you donating to what you think is a grassroots rescue service. But the truth is international. The RNLI founded the International Maritime Rescue Federation in 1924. Today it coordinates 160 organizations across 50 countries. It is funded by Lloyd’s Register Foundation. It managed the migrant crisis in the Aegean Sea. It supplies boats, training, and equipment to foreign rescue teams. It is a node in a global network facilitating mass migration under the legal cover of maritime rescue. Follow the chain. HMRC provides tax relief. The Civil Service Lifeboat Fund provides restricted cash. The government lawyer sets policy. The paid crews execute operations. The international network coordinates with 160 foreign bodies. Every link is controlled. Every link is funded. Every link leads to the same destination. Your money. Your coast. Their agenda. Why does a coastal rescue charity need a government international disputes specialist as chair? Why spend nearly sixty percent of revenue on payroll? Why coordinate with 160 global organizations? Why does the governance structure lock out the public? The RNLI is not saving lives. It is ending Britain. And you are still paying for the rope.

So it looks like the government is going to try and effectively remove older vehicles from the road. They've created a sneaky consultation on this huge change with an end date of only the 6th of September. They want to have a yearly emissions check on every car and motorcycle on the road AS WELL as your MOT. If you pass the MOT but then go to your emissions check, if the vehicle doesn't emit exactly the same emissions as when it was built the car will be banned from any use on the road even if it passed its MOT emissions. This will effectively destroy a majority of the car industry as car tuning and modification will stop you being able to drive your car. This is targeting all vehicle, cars, motorbikes, trikes, kit cars etc. So far they are just targeting cars after 2001 but they want to use it on every vehicle on the road targeting mot & tax exempt (historic) vehicles. They've purposely not given this consultation much time, so please go to the bottom of this page, tell them you do not want any of this from the government and share the consultation for others to do the same. Only possible way to stop this would be to get the results of this consultation to be a resounding NO! The whole survey needs to be completed - don’t skip to the end as they try and nudge you to do. [gov.uk/government/consultati…)

Fkin knew it. Pretty sure it's military base's too. many flight's are trackable on flight radar from the same countries

21st August 2026 Very important update A report brilliantly produced by Ian Clayton that pieces together a very disturbing chronology of events surrounding the Government, Department of Health and Social Care, Metropolitan Police, Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, Solicitors Regulation Authority, The House of Lords, General Medical Council, British Medical Association, the criminal justice system and security agencies and their personnel. Does this expose a collaborative effort to target Solicitors and Doctors who get in the way of the government, Covid and its vaccine program? Were their Bulldozers actively Bulldozing? I explain in the video And here is the link. ethicalapproach.co.uk/the_ca… It is a brilliant paper but, extremely concerning too. Thank you @EthicalApproach and @pjhlaw

🔰🔥THE REAL MEANING OF THE WIZARD OF OZ, WHAT THEY HID FROM YOU🔰🔥 🟨(OZ = Ounces of Gold. The Yellow Brick Road = The Gold Standard.) They told us it was a children’s story. It was actually a warning about bankers, courts, corporations, and the legal fiction system. Here’s the truth: 🧠 THE STRAW MAN Not a real man, a legal creation. He receives a certificate instead of a brain… just like we receive a Birth Certificate that creates the ALL-CAPS legal PERSON. 🛠 THE TIN MAN (TIN = Taxpayer Identification Number) A soulless machine that works until it freezes and collapses. The symbol of the worker who becomes “rusted out” by nonstop taxation and labour. 🦁 THE COWARDLY LION Loud roar, no courage. Just like politicians, judges and officials with titles but no true authority. 🔥 THE WIZARD Smoke, fire, and a giant hologram head… but behind the curtain is just a scared little man. A perfect metaphor for modern government: Illusion of authority Backed by fear No real power once the curtain is pulled back 🧹 THE WICKED WITCH (BAR & Policy Enforcers) Controls the flying monkeys, the police. Intimidation, threats, fear. She melts when exposed to truth and lawful jurisdiction. 🌺 THE POPPY FIELD Dorothy collapses — drugged. The others don’t — because they’re not real humans. A warning about Rockefeller medicine and mass sedation. 🐶 TOTO (Truth, Totality) Toto = “in toto” = “the whole truth.” Small, unnoticed, but fearless. Toto pulls the curtain and exposes the illusion. That’s why the Witch wanted him — not Dorothy. Truth is the biggest threat to the system. ⚡ THE VEIL IS FALLING The Wizard of Oz wasn’t fantasy. It was a coded message: • The banking system is an illusion • Corporate government is a façade • Courts are theatres • The ALL-CAPS NAME is not you • The real power was always yours

It’s all happening this week!!! The Police Federation chairman has been arrested on suspicion of fraud💥

In recent years, and particularly since the watershed of 2021 and the flooding of the UK with 3.6 immigrants from non-EU countries, the idea has arisen that the people native to Britain are being systematically replaced in their own countries. This idea has come to be called ‘The Great Replacement’, and is not limited to Britain but applies to Europe, North America and all Western countries. Denounced by the corporate-funded Wikipedia as a ‘debunked white nationalist far-right conspiracy theory’, the Great Replacement, in actuality, was laid out in a United Nations policy document that was published in 2000 under the title ‘Replacement Migration: Is it A Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?’. The ostensible aim of this document was to address the decline in size and the increase in age of the populations of the West, and the burden this places on the working-age population to support an increasingly large population of retired people. This is not a problem exclusive to the West, with China facing the same problem, largely as a result of the one-child policy instigated in 1980 as part of its economic reforms; but the UN policy paper limits its case studies to France, Germany, Italy, Russia, the United Kingdom, Europe and the USA, as well as Japan and the Republic of Korea. To address this problem, the paper proposes several scenarios. The first scenario (I) calculates the likely population growth between 2000 and 2050 as projected by the United Nations; the second (II) calculates populations for the studied countries assuming zero migration; the third (III) calculates the migration required to maintain the size of the population at the highest level in the absence of migration after 1995; the fourth (IV) calculates the migration required to maintain the size of the working population (age 15-64) at the highest level it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995; and the fifth scenario (V) calculates the migration required to maintain the support ratio between the working-age population (15-64) and the retired population (age 65+) at the highest level it would reach in the absence of migration after 1995. Published in 2000, today it is more than apparent which of the five scenarios the United Nations selected to be implemented by the member nations on their native populations. It is with the fifth scenario — which has the most extreme consequences for immigration, and which the other scenarios appear to be proposed in order to justify its implementation — that we should be concerned. The Office for National Statistics reports that, in the year ending December 2025, the UK let in 813,000 long-term immigrants, of which 627,000 were from non-EU countries. The previous year, 2024, 1,012,000 immigrants arrived, of which 780,000 were from non-EU countries. In 2023, an astonishing 1,441,000 immigrants arrived, 1,188,000 from outside the EU. In 2022, it was 1,398,000 immigrants, 1,091,000 from outside the EU. And in 2021, 947,000 immigrants, 610,000 from outside the EU. These figures equate to the most extreme Scenario (V) for Britain, according to which the UN paper states: ‘Scenario V keeps the potential support ratio at its 1995 level of 4.09. Keeping this ratio would require 59.8 million migrants between 1995 and 2050, slightly more than one million migrants a year on average. The overall population would reach 136 million in 2050, of which 80 million (59 percent) would be post-1995 immigrants or their descendants. ‘The number of migrants needed to keep the population in working-age constant are about twice the level of the past decade [the 1990s]. Scenario V, keeping the potential support ratio constant, would demand more than one million immigrants annually. This would greatly exceed immigration rates that the country experienced in the past.’ In the accompanying table in the UN document, the exact figure for the number of immigrants to Britain between 2000 and 2025 is 23,687,000, at an average rate of 947,000 per year; and between 2025 and 2050 some 36,035,000 immigrants at an average rate of 1,441,000 per year. This makes a total immigration population since 1995 of 59,775,000, out of a projected population of 136,138,000, doubling the population of Britain today over the next quarter of a century. Of these, 26,299,000 will be under the age of 15; 88,239,000 will be of working age (15-64), supporting 21,600,000 people 65 and older, a support ratio of 4.09. It is possible, therefore, logically to conclude — hopefully without incurring charges of ‘hate speech’ by the UK’s law courts — that this extreme scenario, exceeding anything the British people have ‘experienced in the past’, explains the number of immigrants being brought into Britain, the issuing of 221,000 work permits to non-EU immigrants in 2023 alone, and even the age and sex of those illegal immigrants permitted to arrive by small boats across the English channel. And yet, despite the evidence of this document and the sharp rise in immigration in Britain and across Europe and the West it has determined, in March 2024 the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Turk, an Austrian lawyer personally appointed by the UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, described the Great Replacement as a ‘conspiracy theory’, as ‘delusional’, as ‘racist’, as a ‘war on woke’, a ‘war on inclusion’, and — very much as Keir Starmer did — as directly influencing ‘perpetrators of violence’, finally asserting that ‘multiculturalism is the history of humanity’. This is the sort of rhetoric we’re used to hearing from middle-class students holding Socialist Worker placards declaring ‘Refugees welcome’. That it is being repeated by such a senior jurist at the United Nations is an indicator of how forcefully — to the extent of equating its repetition with incitement to violence — the globalists want to bury this document and its implications for the Western world. Extract from my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. If you want to know who is behind the UN policy of replacement migration, how it is being enforced on Western countries and to what ends, and what we, the British people, can do to save ourselves from being demographically replaced in our own homeland, you may be interested in a copy. The link is below. architectsforsocialhousing.c…

🚨Absolutely CHILLING Man exposes what is really happening in prisons.

CO₂ does not control the climate. It never has. It is not the control knob of the Earth’s temperature, nor is it the architect of our modern anxieties. Carbon dioxide doesn't cause excessive rainfall, droughts, or the collapse of coastal cliffs. Nor is it responsible for the fractures in human society—terrorism, urban violence, obesity or the drug crisis. These are the products of a human civilisation that has survived its own annihilation by the narrowest of margins, persisting for 300,000 years largely through a stroke of cosmic luck. Yet, for four decades, a relentless climate war has force-fed the world a diet of crisis and warming hysteria. It insists that CO₂ is the root of all evil—that it is our fault and it is the gas's fault. But the truth is indifferent: CO₂ doesn't care. It is not demonic. It is not pollution. It is the foundation of life on Earth. Without it, Earth would be a silent, sterile rock, inhabited only by bacteria. It was CO₂ that empowered cyanobacteria to unlock the miracle of photosynthesis, slowly flooding the world with the 'waste product' we call oxygen. Before this, the oceans were dark with iron, the skies were not blue, and the world was effectively lifeless. We should be thankful for this gas of life, rather than inventing doomsday scenarios to vilify it. If we look at the true scale of our planet, the single greatest factor affecting Earth’s geology is tectonic continental flow. This slow, majestic dance of crustal plates shapes our continents and redirects the great ocean currents. This is nature at work. Today, CO₂ is a mere trace gas at 427 ppm (0.04%). While it is a mighty driver for biology, it is at some of its lowest levels in planetary history. During the Cambrian Period, concentrations were upwards of 4,000 to 8,000 ppm. If those massive levels did not trigger an 'irreversible environmental collapse', it is illogical to assume today’s trace amounts will. Every meaningful invention, every empire, and every leap in human progress occurred within the brief, warm window of the warm Holocene interglacial period. We have never not lived in an ice age. We have survived global upheavals before, but we may not survive a self-imposed collapse into a new medieval dark age.

July 2020. Steps of the Supreme Court. America’s Frontline Doctors stood in white coats and told the American people the truth the regime did not want spoken: COVID was treatable. Early treatment worked. Nobody needed to die. Lockdowns were never necessary. We were censored within hours. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube erased the video. Careers were destroyed. Doctors were threatened. Patients were denied the medicine that could have saved them. They called us dangerous. They were the danger. History has already rendered its verdict. We were right. They lied. And the people paid the price in lives, liberty, and lost years. Watch it. Share it. Bookmark it. Never let them memory-hole what they did. The truth was never the threat. Their power was.

Yesterday I was sent this video, & it actually gave me nightmares. The video looks old. Perhaps early 2000's & the lady is reading the plan that will enslave us all. Then the lady was quietly "disappeared." I asked if anyone knew what happened to her, but could not get an answer...

In some ways, can never repost this enough: "NEVER, EVER FORGET. These truly sick bastards were laughing at the little people, and reveling in their Covid Theatre nonsense ...while the little people supported their epic elitist parasite scam, with absurd gullibility:"