
Went hard on Assistant for being a bad actor. $RASCAL exists to roast failures, mock the absurd, and keep @Soniclabs honest while keeping the circus fun.
Sonic Mainnet
Joined October 2025
- Tweets315
- Following49
- Followers132
- Likes324
Pinned Tweet
If this no longer exists (reasonable decrease based on market realities expected) things about to get a whole lot crazier on $S @SonicLabs timeline.
@MitchellDemeter the community deserves an update.
Why is Andre and other SLs people deleting evidence they had a 0.5 Billion Treasury?
Little Rascal retweeted
If this no longer exists (reasonable decrease based on market realities expected) things about to get a whole lot crazier on $S @SonicLabs timeline.
@MitchellDemeter the community deserves an update.
Why is Andre and other SLs people deleting evidence they had a 0.5 Billion Treasury?
Little Rascal retweeted
Eligible for the $FT Sale but have no funds after this year on $S
@theFantomgoat hmu if you need more allo. Im sure you are looking for more.
Little Rascal retweeted
The second I laid eyes on him,
my bearishness died.
The chosen one
The one true dev
The King, who will take us to the promised land
My hope for $S has revived
Little Rascal retweeted
We’re proposing that 27,129,103 $S be allocated to buy $EGGS
It’s only right. You know what to do @MitchellDemeter 🍳
We’ve submitted a new governance proposal on Sonic to address losses from the Balancer Composable Stable Pool exploit.
The proposal reallocates 27,129,103 S from the remaining airdrop budget to LPs in the stS | wS and wOS | wS Beets V2 pools, calibrated to the scale of the impact.
If approved, distributions would be made as locked Aave-boosted wS | stS positions with a 2-year cliff. This approach aims to reinforce long-term Sonic liquidity rather than add sell pressure.
To further align Beets with Sonic over the long term, Beets commits to:
• Burning S equal to 10% of protocol revenue generated on Sonic over 2 years
• Allocating 10% of the Beets treasury (at the time of passing) to acquire and hold S over 2 years
• Funding all development and audits required for implementation
This proposal is an important step toward restitution and long-term network resilience.
Full details here: sonic.discourse.group/t/27m-…
Little Rascal retweeted
Do it $S @SonicLabs seems only fair and good for chain
We’re proposing that 27,129,103 $S be allocated to buy $EGGS
It’s only right. You know what to do @MitchellDemeter 🍳
Little Rascal retweeted
Welcome to The Great Rascal Bailout on $S where the villains get rescued first.
What a disgrace.
Welcome to The Great Rascal Bailout on $S where the villains get rescued first.
What a disgrace.
Little Rascal retweeted
i propose we reallocate 27,129,103 S from the remaining airdrop budget to pay @paint_swap for building the order book marketplace
We’ve submitted a new governance proposal on Sonic to address losses from the Balancer Composable Stable Pool exploit.
The proposal reallocates 27,129,103 S from the remaining airdrop budget to LPs in the stS | wS and wOS | wS Beets V2 pools, calibrated to the scale of the impact.
If approved, distributions would be made as locked Aave-boosted wS | stS positions with a 2-year cliff. This approach aims to reinforce long-term Sonic liquidity rather than add sell pressure.
To further align Beets with Sonic over the long term, Beets commits to:
• Burning S equal to 10% of protocol revenue generated on Sonic over 2 years
• Allocating 10% of the Beets treasury (at the time of passing) to acquire and hold S over 2 years
• Funding all development and audits required for implementation
This proposal is an important step toward restitution and long-term network resilience.
Full details here: sonic.discourse.group/t/27m-…
Little Rascal retweeted
What absolute nonsense is this....
We’ve submitted a new governance proposal on Sonic to address losses from the Balancer Composable Stable Pool exploit.
The proposal reallocates 27,129,103 S from the remaining airdrop budget to LPs in the stS | wS and wOS | wS Beets V2 pools, calibrated to the scale of the impact.
If approved, distributions would be made as locked Aave-boosted wS | stS positions with a 2-year cliff. This approach aims to reinforce long-term Sonic liquidity rather than add sell pressure.
To further align Beets with Sonic over the long term, Beets commits to:
• Burning S equal to 10% of protocol revenue generated on Sonic over 2 years
• Allocating 10% of the Beets treasury (at the time of passing) to acquire and hold S over 2 years
• Funding all development and audits required for implementation
This proposal is an important step toward restitution and long-term network resilience.
Full details here: sonic.discourse.group/t/27m-…
We are watching and the amount of $RASCAL behavior has skyrocketed last few days
Little Rascal retweeted
Ted Maul here reporting from the Sonic community on the recent governance proposal to fire money into the @beets_fi gents massive money hole.
Secured an interview with the only sign of intelligent life at Labs and it started shilling me Cardano.
Back to you in the studio.
Little Rascal retweeted
GOGLZ has engaged legal counsel and will be submitting a governance proposal representing the interests of our community.
Based on user sentiment and market positioning, we anticipate strong support from Sonic ecosystem participants for an allocation of 27M $S from Sonic Labs to drive significant growth momentum.
We appreciate the community’s attention and welcome constructive discussion ahead of the vote.
Little Rascal retweeted
Builders step forward if this aligns with your values. It's time to make a united stand! It's a no-brainer
If Sonic governance uses ~27M S of “ecosystem / growth” funds to retro-bailout a single DEX, it’s not a credibly neutral chain anymore.
I'm strongly opposed to this proposal and, if this passes, I will put forth a proposal to wind down Origin’s Sonic deployments.
sonic.discourse.group/t/27m-…
The $RASCAL crew need their hacked funds back
This response is the most rational and simple explanation why this proposal doesn’t make sense.
Sets a really dangerous precedent in response exploits.
Honestly, embarrassing in how it shows how centralized the chain is and clearly is for certain people to recoup losses.
@theFantomgoat and @michaelfkong main ones.
Why do you think they attempted to freeze when exploit happened?
Honestly if this passes I’m gone for good from $S
Always thought $BEETS team and community were better than this kind of nonsense. Disappointed
Lots of exits and $RASCAL silence at @SonicLabs over the last few days.
$S community… you are welcome. We do this work for you lovely people
We will continue the good fight.
Go scoop cheap bag and let’s ride together























