Went hard on Assistant for being a bad actor. $RASCAL exists to roast failures, mock the absurd, and keep @Soniclabs honest while keeping the circus fun.

Sonic Mainnet
Joined October 2025
If this no longer exists (reasonable decrease based on market realities expected) things about to get a whole lot crazier on $S @SonicLabs timeline. @MitchellDemeter the community deserves an update. Why is Andre and other SLs people deleting evidence they had a 0.5 Billion Treasury?
3
11
33
2,296
If this no longer exists (reasonable decrease based on market realities expected) things about to get a whole lot crazier on $S @SonicLabs timeline. @MitchellDemeter the community deserves an update. Why is Andre and other SLs people deleting evidence they had a 0.5 Billion Treasury?
3
11
33
2,296
Little Rascal retweeted
Eligible for the $FT Sale but have no funds after this year on $S @theFantomgoat hmu if you need more allo. Im sure you are looking for more.
3
1
1
24
1,169
Little Rascal retweeted
The second I laid eyes on him, my bearishness died. The chosen one The one true dev The King, who will take us to the promised land My hope for $S has revived
🧠 Incubating the future of blockchain developers on Sonic with the Brooklyn College Computer Science Club.
8
3
1
49
4,907
We’re proposing that 27,129,103 $S be allocated to buy $EGGS It’s only right. You know what to do @MitchellDemeter 🍳
We’ve submitted a new governance proposal on Sonic to address losses from the Balancer Composable Stable Pool exploit. The proposal reallocates 27,129,103 S from the remaining airdrop budget to LPs in the stS | wS and wOS | wS Beets V2 pools, calibrated to the scale of the impact. If approved, distributions would be made as locked Aave-boosted wS | stS positions with a 2-year cliff. This approach aims to reinforce long-term Sonic liquidity rather than add sell pressure. To further align Beets with Sonic over the long term, Beets commits to: • Burning S equal to 10% of protocol revenue generated on Sonic over 2 years • Allocating 10% of the Beets treasury (at the time of passing) to acquire and hold S over 2 years • Funding all development and audits required for implementation This proposal is an important step toward restitution and long-term network resilience. Full details here: sonic.discourse.group/t/27m-…
9
5
1
51
4,143
Little Rascal retweeted
Do it $S @SonicLabs seems only fair and good for chain
We’re proposing that 27,129,103 $S be allocated to buy $EGGS It’s only right. You know what to do @MitchellDemeter 🍳
3
12
870
Welcome to The Great Rascal Bailout on $S where the villains get rescued first. What a disgrace.
5
11
29
835
Welcome to The Great Rascal Bailout on $S where the villains get rescued first. What a disgrace.
5
11
29
835
Little Rascal retweeted
i propose we reallocate 27,129,103 S from the remaining airdrop budget to pay @paint_swap for building the order book marketplace
We’ve submitted a new governance proposal on Sonic to address losses from the Balancer Composable Stable Pool exploit. The proposal reallocates 27,129,103 S from the remaining airdrop budget to LPs in the stS | wS and wOS | wS Beets V2 pools, calibrated to the scale of the impact. If approved, distributions would be made as locked Aave-boosted wS | stS positions with a 2-year cliff. This approach aims to reinforce long-term Sonic liquidity rather than add sell pressure. To further align Beets with Sonic over the long term, Beets commits to: • Burning S equal to 10% of protocol revenue generated on Sonic over 2 years • Allocating 10% of the Beets treasury (at the time of passing) to acquire and hold S over 2 years • Funding all development and audits required for implementation This proposal is an important step toward restitution and long-term network resilience. Full details here: sonic.discourse.group/t/27m-…
5
6
1
62
3,829
What absolute nonsense is this....
We’ve submitted a new governance proposal on Sonic to address losses from the Balancer Composable Stable Pool exploit. The proposal reallocates 27,129,103 S from the remaining airdrop budget to LPs in the stS | wS and wOS | wS Beets V2 pools, calibrated to the scale of the impact. If approved, distributions would be made as locked Aave-boosted wS | stS positions with a 2-year cliff. This approach aims to reinforce long-term Sonic liquidity rather than add sell pressure. To further align Beets with Sonic over the long term, Beets commits to: • Burning S equal to 10% of protocol revenue generated on Sonic over 2 years • Allocating 10% of the Beets treasury (at the time of passing) to acquire and hold S over 2 years • Funding all development and audits required for implementation This proposal is an important step toward restitution and long-term network resilience. Full details here: sonic.discourse.group/t/27m-…
8
7
70
4,277
Little Rascal retweeted
Replying to @LilRascalSonic
Send it with AK-47 & RPG
1
1
5
183
The second this picture hit timeline, $S group chats instantly exploded. No coordination. No prep. Just natural-born clown detection instincts. We are so fucking back. $RASCAL
3
5
16
1,299
We are watching and the amount of $RASCAL behavior has skyrocketed last few days
1
4
8
282
Ted Maul here reporting from the Sonic community on the recent governance proposal to fire money into the @beets_fi gents massive money hole. Secured an interview with the only sign of intelligent life at Labs and it started shilling me Cardano. Back to you in the studio.
2
2
3
339
GOGLZ has engaged legal counsel and will be submitting a governance proposal representing the interests of our community. Based on user sentiment and market positioning, we anticipate strong support from Sonic ecosystem participants for an allocation of 27M $S from Sonic Labs to drive significant growth momentum. We appreciate the community’s attention and welcome constructive discussion ahead of the vote.
15
11
3
107
5,938
Builders step forward if this aligns with your values. It's time to make a united stand! It's a no-brainer
If Sonic governance uses ~27M S of “ecosystem / growth” funds to retro-bailout a single DEX, it’s not a credibly neutral chain anymore. I'm strongly opposed to this proposal and, if this passes, I will put forth a proposal to wind down Origin’s Sonic deployments. sonic.discourse.group/t/27m-…
4
4
58
2,150
The $RASCAL crew need their hacked funds back
This response is the most rational and simple explanation why this proposal doesn’t make sense. Sets a really dangerous precedent in response exploits. Honestly, embarrassing in how it shows how centralized the chain is and clearly is for certain people to recoup losses. @theFantomgoat and @michaelfkong main ones. Why do you think they attempted to freeze when exploit happened? Honestly if this passes I’m gone for good from $S Always thought $BEETS team and community were better than this kind of nonsense. Disappointed
1
4
148
BOUNCE. $GOGLZ
7
9
2
33
3,549
Little Rascal retweeted
Replying to @chemacs @jetlagged0
It is not true
1
1
2
108
Lots of exits and $RASCAL silence at @SonicLabs over the last few days. $S community… you are welcome. We do this work for you lovely people We will continue the good fight. Go scoop cheap bag and let’s ride together
2
7
15
763