Level of Analysis retweeted
"analytic philosophy" and it's just a bunch of subjects S at time t in world w necessarily believing that p iff p is entailed by some argument
This 2,000 year old fresco belonged to the wife of Emperor Augustus.
Painted in 30 BC for Empress Livia’s summer dining room.
It was buried in her villa in Prima Porta for centuries, then moved to Palazzo Massimo, Rome to save it.
And it still looks like this.
credit justtravelli
Level of Analysis retweeted
Art Deco didn't die from being exhausted, it got blacklisted.
Its three main phases - Zigzag, PWA / Stripped Classical, & Streamline - weren't exactly sequential, they overlapped all throughout the 30s. But what happened after 1929 wasn't just that zig zag Deco became too expensive, it was evolving from the 'Return to Order' (WW1) beginnings towards a more robust machine age adapted classicism.
Earlier funding collapsed from private elites to the state, and a more civic form emerged - Stripped Classical/Classical Moderne. It was transatlantic, global. The American WPA, PWA, democracies and authoritarian regimes across the West all embraced it because the goal was the same: instill optimism, civic-mindedness, and resilience. Put your skilled artists & artisans to work.
It was seen as worthy recieving state funding for its public face - blending both classical & modern, a forward facing embrace between design, industry & craft.
That more colorful zig zag form was made logistically difficult to revive after 29, then that difficulty was made permanent. Deco needed a 50-year Beaux-Arts ecosystem - terracotta kilns like Gladding McBean and Atlantic Terra Cotta, plasterers, metal foundries, carvers, mosaicists - & that ecosystem took two hits.
The 29 crash bankrupted the firms & dissolved the apprenticeship pipeline, then the war shifted what was left to war industries. By 1948 a fully crafted lobby was hard to build like 1926 even if you wanted to.
Hard isnt impossible. With a regular cycle craft revives with demand, but revival was blocked.
Tax codes, FAR, federal budgets, and curtain-wall specs all rewarded flat, uncrafted surfaces, so there wasnt much incentive to maintain the ateliers.
The firmest lockout was ideological. To make High Modernism the post-war approved standard, its promoters had to discredit what came before.
Politically, Stripped Classicism was rebranded as "fascistic" because Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin had used identical forms. Culturally Deco, especially Streamline, was the 1930s World's Fair spirit: mass-produced household objects made beautiful, futuristic, optimistic, commercial & everyday.
High Modernism was austere, 'European' & highbrow, it treated that populist optimism as kitsch. That created a self-fulfilling loop: disincentivize the decorative, let craft firms die, then accuse dead craft as proof decorative design is infeasible.
Hence the narrative that Deco simply "fell from public taste" is fake.
It was slowed by the war, logistically hollowed out by '48, then ideologically blacklisted afterwards - making way for [indirect] tacit state support through modernist capture this time with the opposite design ethos: (mid century)"modernism".
The people never chose the glass modernist box over Deco. The people were simply never asked.
Replying to @oldbooksguy
Simply moderne.
"Jazz" is hindsight & it effectively ends with the 1929 crash. Classical Moderne thrives afterwards side by side with Streamline Moderne - the whole thing isnt stopped until late 1940s.
Level of Analysis retweeted
Ralph McQuarrie’s 1986 cover art for "The Genesis Quest," by Donald Moffitt
Level of Analysis retweeted
some of my writing is briefly quoted here so i should say that although there's stuff here about the history of the rationalist movement and its influence on AI that's worth knowing, overall this is a lazy incurious attempt at a smear campaign. cal's argument basically boils down to "did you know that some of the people talking about AI risk are doing it because they were influenced by eliezer yudkowsky, who is a weirdo? this means they're wrong and can be safely ignored"
this is head-in-the-sand behavior. i've written many things critical of the rationalists but i've never said i thought they were wrong about AI risk (because i don't think that). it should be increasingly clear to anyone who's actually paying attention that rationalists and rationalist-influenced thinkers have been among the clearest thinkers on AI (certainly not exclusively, or universally), who have warned consistently that various bad things will happen several of which have now happened, who have been consistently mocked for these warnings despite being consistently proven right, etc. etc.
confronting the reality of the singularity is terrifying. you don't have to believe the most apocalyptic scenarios to understand that inventing superintelligence is unlike anything we've ever done before as a species. it is terrifying to really absorb the future shock of this, which is why there is of course an enormous market for writers who are willing to sell people excuses to keep pretending that things will be basically normal
Why are the leaders of AI companies saying "Our products are going to extinguish humanity. Invest in us!" They come from an eccentric Berkeley subculture in which this eschatology is a sacred belief. Good analysis in a NYT op-ed by Cal Newport. nytimes.com/2026/09/05/opini…
Level of Analysis retweeted
Whoa- this is the most fantastic pedagogical tool I’ve encountered in as long as I can remember (which is a helluva high bar, considering who I live with).
I’m so excited to have my 6yo play with it! And you all should too.
anyhumanever.com/
Level of Analysis retweeted
The exactness of reflection depicted in the artworks of Norwegian painter Frits Thaulow (1847–1906)















































