Joined September 2020
Legate retweeted
It’s hoodie season.
21
67
1
1,800
7,594
"Seize the means of production" It's a 70% service economy, what fucking production. You're gonna seize the Salesforce licenses and Kiosks?
106
594
29
12,359
160,324
That's why it should just be automatic for every birth and mandated by law, then it's not your husband asking, it's just standard procedure. Can women come up with any actual reasons to oppose this?
I hope men understand that asking a woman for a DNA test is highly disrespectful
15
35
572
5,066
Asking for a DNA test is mildly disrespectful. Finding out your son or daughter you raised for 18 years is another man's child and that you are now a genetic dead end, your main life's purpose is gone, and your wife never loved you is maybe slightly worse
I hope men understand that asking a woman for a DNA test is highly disrespectful
53
636
13
11,532
109,358
Legate retweeted
74
972
37
15,897
367,787
People who are not familiar with Latin culture think it's related to age, but here is what is actually happening On your 15th birthday(quinceañera) La Lechuza (owl witch) comes in the night to steal your youth, and if your soul is pure she lets you pass, if she sees darkenss, she goes to Tata Duende, dueño de casa (king of the short, bearded mischievous goblin spirits guarding the house) and asks for permission to take her youth. Tata seeing the darkenss agrees but on one condition, you have time to purge the darkness. she casts a spell on you that steals your youth. However she is a fair witch and has agreed to give you time to become good so she casts the spell so that it doesn't efect you until you have eaten your 1 millionth bean. This happens the moment you swallow it and can be completely avoided by eating less or no beans. The moral of the story is eating 1 million beans makes you fat.
Why are Mexican women destined to become tortas. Its every one of them. Big ole gut tiny stick legs.
193
398
48
10,095
1,032,513
Legate retweeted
Same reason a woman cop is a grievous threat to life and limb. When it comes to conflict, men have a dial. Women have a switch
When I say that women lack the concept of an honorable enemy, this is what I’m talking about. Obviously a lot of the Democrats’ new vindictiveness is Trump derangement, but the Great Feminization is part of the story, too. Men understand that the other guy is a professional just like me, and we should have an open fight by fair rules and both go home at the end of the day. For women, conflict isn’t over until the other side is gone and they never have to talk to them again. Men believe in hierarchy, so a fight is about establishing dominance within the hierarchy and making the other guy subordinate. Women don’t, everything is egalitarian and consensus-driven, so if you do get conflict, the only possible outcome is total exclusion from the group. It makes sense that the Democratic Party is abandoning old-fashioned ideas about honorable conflict as it becomes more dominated by women.
10
63
2
946
8,489
Legate retweeted
Most women before the sexual revolution weren't innately attracted to their husbands. Jane Austin's bibliography is about teaching women to not let first impressions get in the way of getting married to safe but unremarkable men. This is a big elephant in the room you see on here
84
184
19
4,076
101,421
“Why are young people economic leftists?” I can’t answer this question for the francophone world, but in the United States my answer/s would be: 1) young people are broadly extremely misinformed about the structure of Western economic systems. Many of them are convinced that our economies are far more laissez-faire and deregulated than they actually are. 2) young people are extremely misinformed about the sheer quantity of government spending, and especially how much the government spends relative to the income/wealth of the richest people (e.g. all the assets of every billionaire in America would fund single payer healthcare for a year and a half) 3) young people broadly feel like the ability to accumulate wealth is not a benefit to them and like they are locked out of systems of asset accumulation. 4) in youth circles, economic griping is paradoxically often “high status.” developing radical political approaches wrt cost of living is generally viewed positively.
the naturally follow-up is “why do they think that’s the solution?”
71
201
20
2,332
69,175
In order to bring them into contact, you need to transport modern Somalia back in time to the early second century. The Somali economy is heavily dependent upon imports for food, energy, and technology, including military technology; a huge part of its economy is also comprised of remittances. Its government, such as it has a government, is propped up by international aid agencies. All imports, remittances, and aid cease immediately. Somalia's government collapses more or less overnight as Mogadishu descends into food riots. Over the next few months famine stalks through the land. Cannibalism is not uncommon. The state fragments almost immediately along clannish lines. Somalia becomes a patchwork of feuding warlords, fighting over rapidly diminishing supplies of food and fuel. Supplies of ammunition are seriously depleted over several months of vicious internecine warfare. Warlords along the frontier eventually figure out that they have somehow found themselves almost two thousand years in the past. They do the natural thing and begin conquering petty kingdoms for themselves, using their overwhelming advantage in firepower to subjugate tribesmen in what is now Kenya and Ethiopia. Word of these easy conquests reaches back to famished horde of refugees fleeing Mogadishu, which pushes out into East Africa in a disorganized mass of little warbands each looking to carve out their own little tribal domain. It takes about a year for trade routes to carry word of this miraculous catastrophe to Rome, several thousand kilometres distant. These are initially treated as fantastical rumours of a distant land, and largely ignored. After a few years, the persistence of these rumors leads to a diplomatic mission being despatched. By the time the Roman legate arrives in Mogadishu, several years have passed. Mogadishu's population is dramatically reduced, and most of the high technology has ceased to function due to the absence of spare parts and the scarcity of fuel. The city is no longer electrified. Ammunition stocks have long since been depleted. The local warlord has consolidated what fuel, ammunition, and functioning technology remain, and he conserves it jealously. The hundreds of minor warlords that pressed out into the African frontier have done the same in their respective territories. Modern technology has already reached the level of a magical artifact: decisively powerful, but rare and irreplaceable. The legate's primary objective is to return with some of these wonders, and he is authorized to make extravagant gifts in order to secure access to them. The real prize would be the technical volumes in Mogadishu University's library. Much of it would be well beyond the comprehension of Roman engineers, but it would probably not take them long to learn the rudiments of modern chemistry and metallurgy, the principles of steam power, and the use of coal (available in abundance in modern Britain, a fact which would also be apparent from library's geological texts). The Romans would find the concept of a railroad particularly fascinating. Long before Somalis could come into military contact with Rome, technological diffusion would have set off an industrial revolution in the Roman Empire. The Rome the Somalis encounter along frontier of their warlord expansion would have legions equipped with muskets, triremes with cannons, and steam trains thundering across its new railway system. Meanwhile the Somalis themselves, perfectly incapable of even manufacturing new 7.62 for their AKs, much less repairing their technicals and helicopters, would be back to riding on horseback and fighting with spears, arrows, and black-powder muskets. What high technology they still have would be held in reserve as strategic weapons to be used only in dire emergencies. When war finally arrives the Somali technological advantage has been almost entirely eroded. The conflict is decisive. Rome crushes them.
55
205
6
3,991
128,988
It is absolutely disgraceful to threaten young Americans for participating in politics and serving their country.
22
791
7
10,094
95,879
So to import 10 million people you just have to do nothing(open the border, lax checks on flight visas) and to deport 10 million people you need the gestapo, suspension of citizenship rights, deputization, mass militias. It's thermodynamics
18
78
6
2,000
21,011
Legate retweeted
This is cope 343 was shut down because the CEO of Xbox visited and found out no Halo games were in development ....years after Halo Infinite launched
Xbox reportedly had much bigger plans for Halo 2 and Halo 3 remakes than fans may have expected. The projects, reportedly known internally as “Project Manihi,” were being developed by Halo Studios before layoffs and the subsequent restructuring around Halo. The planned Halo 2 remake could have included: -Dual-wielding -A more complete multiplayer experience -Classic gameplay elements The Halo 3 remake was reportedly even more ambitious, with: -Multiplayer -Forge -Theater -Firefight -Additional missions The idea was apparently to make the remakes feel like major flagship releases rather than simple visual upgrades. The plans were ultimately scrapped following the layoffs.
40
161
2
4,759
74,878
Mutual respect seems to be a male only concept, so let me explain it to you. It is founded on a simple principle: the boundaries we expect others to respect are the same boundaries we are obligated to respect ourselves. Men generally understand this intuitively. You do not casually shove another man aside or presume that your personal importance entitles you to disregard his dignity. It is generally understood that a violation of this principal is a provocation to violence, precisely because it violates the principle of mutual respect. Here, a woman shoves a man aside like his his personal boundaries are beneath her consideration. When he responds by shoving her back, the people lose their fucking minds. But what, exactly, is the problem? That he violated her boundaries? She had already violated his! That he failed to show her respect? She did the same thing! Women do not respect this simple principle of mutual respect, which in a truly egalitarian world should clearly be binding to everyone. Instead whenever a women is involved we are suddenly expected to apply a different standard. What do you want? Do you want equality between men and women? Because what it seems you really want is the relationship between a medieval aristocrat and a peasant.
We're not talking enough about THIS moment from the #Duke football game immediately after he struck her She is AFRAID of him after the first hit and is now watching his face and keeping her arm up to attempt to protect herself from another blow from Kimari Robinson
351
526
37
7,686
397,392
People think this is a joke but this is quite literally what just happened in the Harry Potter fandom.
Fandoms when women and queers stop making fan content
74
1,967
18
42,516
777,854
Bruh. He's right. They threatened to level Paris like they did Warsaw if France didn't surrender, but after the surrender? They didn't damage any of the cultural heritage sites at all. In fact when Paris was about to be liberated by the advancing Allies, General von Choltitz disobeyed direct orders destroy the city and instead surrendered it intact to preserve it. Sure, I won't pretend that the Nazis didn't go around plundering artwork. But literally every army throughout all of history has plundered conquered lands. When the Mongols did it, they deliberately erased entire civilizations- making the rivers run red with blood and black with ink. And by the end, we were able to recover 85% of what the Nazis stole. So yes, Muslims are worse enemies than literal goose-stepping Nazis. The only mitigating factor is that Muslims are generally retards who lack the level of industrialization needed to threaten the West, and our greatest weakness is that some of us are dumb enough to let them into our borders
Replying to @hayasaka_aryan
The ultimate red pill is realizing the Nazis did less harm to Paris than immigrants.
66
937
14
10,097
87,434
Most men raising the issue of “obligation sex” aren’t primarily arguing that a wife must have sex whenever her husband wants it, regardless of her desire. They’re pointing out a double standard in how marital duties are treated. Husbands are routinely expected to fulfill their responsibilities—providing, protecting, emotional support, household labor, and the rest—without the option to opt out simply because they “don’t feel like it” that day. These duties are treated as ongoing obligations within the marriage. Yet when it comes to sexual intimacy, the conversation often shifts: a wife’s lack of desire or consent in the moment is treated as absolute and sufficient grounds to withhold it indefinitely, with little reciprocal expectation. If consent is the governing principle that can suspend one core marital contribution, consistency requires asking why the same principle doesn’t equally allow a husband to suspend the contributions expected of him. The underlying point is about reciprocity. If sex is no longer framed as a mutual marital duty but solely as something requiring ongoing, enthusiastic consent from one party, then the framework should apply symmetrically to the other party’s duties as well. Otherwise, consent functions as a one-way veto rather than a shared standard.
I think the conversation surrounding “obligation sex” is muddying the waters when it comes to intimacy within a marriage. In my mind, it’s almost a position that convinces one spouse, usually the woman, that it’s not an important part of a healthy marriage. What are your thoughts?
261
239
33
3,420
258,448
My cursory knowledge of French politics is that they have universal pensions they can't afford so they let in a lot of young Muslims hoping they'd pay payroll taxes and that was dumb and everything is burning.
121
687
39
15,714
159,917
I mean, other than certain plot reworks to make things more coherent (of which there would be MANY) the things I would change would be: 1. Malfoid. Obviously. It just works. 'Nuff said. 2. Put Hermione in Ravenclaw and Ron in Hufflepuff. Hermione very obviously should have been a Ravenclaw, and I think making her so she fails to get her into her desired house could serve as a great narrative motivator for actually being a braver person. As for Ron, making him the SINGLE Weasley in his family to NOT get sorted into Gryffindor would only make him feel more like he's the weak link of his family, but like any true Hufflepuff he would demonstrate his unflinching loyalty. Even makes the point of him wielding the Sword of Gryffindor more poignant in Deathly Hallows, as he basically proves to himself that he's worthy to be called brave. PLUS if this means we're redeeming Malfoy, you now have one member from each house working together to stop Voldy, which is a very strong narrative beat. Even gives you more setting variety, as they could all visit each other's common rooms. 3. Rework the Elder Wand. Harry winning by a technicality about the intracies if wizard disarmament is silly. Instead, make it so that the Elder Wand's full power can only be used by "a master of death" most wizards eventually interpret this as meaning you have to kill the previous owner (especially given the wand's bloody history) but Harry realizes that becoming a master of death isn't about mastering death, but accepting it (it DOES have a thestral hair as its core, after all). Harry is a true master of the Elder Wand because he readily accepts his mortality, and isn't afraid to die, while Voldemort is terrified of it, thus ironically ensuring his ultimate demise. 4. One last tiny change: instead of making Evada Kedavra unblockable, make it really easy to block instead. This allows wizard fights to be dynamic rather than just "bad guys shoot green death lasers but always miss because they have the aim of stormtroopers." The good wizards are trying to stun or disarm while the Death Eaters are constantly trying to maim or injure to prevent the target from blocking the killing blow. If you wanted to make Voldemort extra scary you could say he's so powerful and so skilled with it that his Evafa Kedavra is unblockable, but the spell itself is a bit too OP in my book.
How would you change the Harry Potter book series?
148
241
23
5,179
250,236
Legate retweeted
It's not the past sex. It's that most of the past sex happened for the cost of a drink with relative strangers with great enthusiasm, while today's sex must be earned and carefully doled out as a penalty for being relationship material
ladies please lie to your next boyfriend about your bodycount. one honest number & his entire perception of you collapses. just say 1 or 2. pretend youre talking to your dad.
65
352
16
9,550
274,765