
Research Scientist at @SakanaAILabs I build Continuous Thought Machines: https://xitter.cf/t.co/6Nbme8J44r I research intelligence from the ground up.
Tokyo, Japan
Joined May 2025
- Tweets120
- Following148
- Followers1.4K
- Likes357
I helped start this group and I'm incredibly proud of these people and what they have accomplished.
Very much one of the best environments for open and creative research, truly.
Introducing the Sakana AI Frontier Intelligence Group 🪷
sakana.ai/frontier-intellige…
Current AI systems are incredibly capable, but is intelligence “solved”? And if not, what’s missing?
At Sakana AI’s Frontier Intelligence Group (FIG), we believe that there are still breakthroughs to be made in AI. The Transformer and language modeling may be incredibly powerful, but it doesn’t mean that better alternatives don’t exist.
Natural intelligence still beats artificial intelligence across many dimensions. Agents lack the deep insights and creativity of humans. Individual models require far more data than the brain to learn robustly, and require far more energy to run. If we set these as targets, what kinds of AI systems could we develop?
Research at FIG has sought to address the gaps between natural and artificial intelligence. Here are some of our works, and the fundamental research questions that motivated them:
• Continuous Thought Machines: How can we improve information processing by leveraging temporal dynamics?
• Augmented Lagrangian Predictive Coding: How can local learning solve multilayer credit assignment?
• Sparser, Faster, Lighter Transformer Models: How can we massively increase data efficiency and generalization?
• The AI Picbreeder Experiment: How can we make artificial open-ended systems?
• Smart Cellular Bricks: How can physical systems achieve collective intelligence and self-repair without a central brain?
We hope that this encourages other researchers to also explore different paradigms, and take a leap of faith with us. After all, in the words of a dear friend of ours, “greatness cannot be planned”.
Luke Darlow retweeted
Introducing PC-ALM, a local-learning alternative to backpropagation.
Our method trains 1000-layer neural nets using only local dynamics, and without backprop.
Blog: pub.sakana.ai/pc-alm/
Standard deep learning relies on backpropagation. The brain, however, cannot implement backpropagation, at least not exactly. How can a physical system, such as the brain, solve multilayer credit assignment without explicit use of backprop?
We look for inspiration in two related fields: distributed optimization and NeuroAI.
In NeuroAI, predictive coding asks each neuron activation to solve an energy-based inference problem instead of using a standard forward pass. That inference step can be implemented as energy-minimization dynamics on local prediction errors.
This perspective -- each layer as a dynamical system -- has proven promising, but performance of predictive coding hasn't scaled well with depth. Credit signals at far ends of the network struggle to diffuse into internal layers.
We turn to distributed optimization, generalizing predictive coding to use an augmented Lagrangian instead of energy. This motivation stems back to a classic 1988 paper by LeCun, showing that the Lagrange multipliers of a deep network can be identified with gradients of a supervised loss. The augmented Lagrangian then bridges LeCun's perspective to the standard predictive coding that is used in NeuroAI.
We find that this new perspective yields a natural PC-like alternative to backpropagation, resulting in a method we call PC-ALM. PC-ALM differs from PC in that it introduces dual neurons (Lagrange multipliers) as part of the layer-local dynamics, resulting in each layer acting as a PI feedback control system to minimize local prediction errors.
We find that PC-ALM is capable of propagating signals to seemingly arbitrary depth, especially in deep narrow networks where standard PC struggles to learn.
Ultimately, our motivation here is to understand how distributed physical systems, such as the brain, can compute credit signals using only local coupling and local dynamics.
PC-ALM may also inform deep learning in neuromorphic hardware, where dynamics are cheaper than on GPUs.
Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2605.31022
Code: github.com/SakanaAI/pc-alm
On the pod: @MLStreetTalk's paper "Why Creativity Cannot Be Interpolated" with @ecsquendor + Dr. Jeremy Budd.
A deep dive into creativity, understanding, neuro-symbolic AI, human-AI collaboration, and how systems capable of extending their own phylogeny could become creative.
This is too cool! @YesThisIsLion
The full Transformer vs Post-Transformer debate is live.
80 minutes. Seven rounds. No slides. Real disagreement.
@lukaszkaiser came to defend the Transformer. @adrian_pathway, @YesThisIsLion, and @mlech26l made the case for what comes next.
00:00 Contenders enter the ring
06:30 Lukasz Kaiser defends the Transformer
10:08 Adrian Kosowski on BDH and the PageRank Moment for AI
17:35 Llion Jones: Why Transformers aren't the final architecture
29:50 Mathias Lechner on Liquid AI’s approach, Fast Weights, and Self-Replacing AI
40:28 Reasoning Beyond Language
44:15 Scaling Laws: Transformer vs Post Transformer
50:31 Benchmarks, Coding Models, and Perplexity
1:04:00 Continual Learning and Dynamic Weights
This is the ultimate source of truth on the subject.
Luke Darlow retweeted
We are honored to be featured in the latest @TwoMinutePapers video!
You all can watch the full video here:
youtu.be/QzZ4VwDHAT4
Here’s a short clip from it:
What happens when you put competing neural networks in a Petri Dish and start changing the rules while they adapt?
Last year we released Petri Dish NCA, where neural nets are the organisms that learn during simulation. Today we're releasing Digital Ecosystems: a browser-based platform for interactive artificial life research.
The setup: several small CNNs share a 2D grid, each seeing only a 3x3 neighborhood. No global plan. They compete for territory by attacking neighbours and defending against incoming attacks, learning via gradient descent online while the simulation runs.
What we didn't expect was the role of the learning itself. Gradient descent isn't just optimising each species' strategy. Instead, it acts to stabilize the whole system during simulation. Species that overextend get pushed back by the loss. Species that stagnate get nudged to grow. This means you can push parameters toward edge-of-chaos regimes: a zone characterised by emergent complexity. Letting the neural networks learn acts to hold the complex system together while you explore and interact.
The platform lets you steer all of this interactively. You can draw walls to create niches, erase parts of the system online, and tune 40+ system parameters to explore the most interesting configurations. We find it mesmerizing to watch species carve out territories and reorganise when you perturb them.
Everything runs client-side in your browser, no install needed.
Blog: pub.sakana.ai/digital-ecosys…
Code: github.com/SakanaAI/digital-…
Thank you so much @twominutepapers for featuring my work. I'm so happy that you had "an almost illegal amount of fun"!
Huge thanks to Hannah Erlebach @hannaherlebach, Lukas Seiers @l_seier, Antonio León Villares @alv314159, Michael Beukman @mcbeukman for their great feedback that improved the paper. @LearningLukeD for the early support and for releasing the amazing substrate pub.sakana.ai/pdnca together with the awesome @_ivyzhang
Super happy to share my new research! I've been building out this web demo purely for the sake of understanding how the system works, but I thought I'd share it with the world. Enjoy!
What happens when you put competing neural networks in a Petri Dish and start changing the rules while they adapt?
Last year we released Petri Dish NCA, where neural nets are the organisms that learn during simulation. Today we're releasing Digital Ecosystems: a browser-based platform for interactive artificial life research.
The setup: several small CNNs share a 2D grid, each seeing only a 3x3 neighborhood. No global plan. They compete for territory by attacking neighbours and defending against incoming attacks, learning via gradient descent online while the simulation runs.
What we didn't expect was the role of the learning itself. Gradient descent isn't just optimising each species' strategy. Instead, it acts to stabilize the whole system during simulation. Species that overextend get pushed back by the loss. Species that stagnate get nudged to grow. This means you can push parameters toward edge-of-chaos regimes: a zone characterised by emergent complexity. Letting the neural networks learn acts to hold the complex system together while you explore and interact.
The platform lets you steer all of this interactively. You can draw walls to create niches, erase parts of the system online, and tune 40+ system parameters to explore the most interesting configurations. We find it mesmerizing to watch species carve out territories and reorganise when you perturb them.
Everything runs client-side in your browser, no install needed.
Blog: pub.sakana.ai/digital-ecosys…
Code: github.com/SakanaAI/digital-…
Luke Darlow retweeted
What happens when you put competing neural networks in a Petri Dish and start changing the rules while they adapt?
Last year we released Petri Dish NCA, where neural nets are the organisms that learn during simulation. Today we're releasing Digital Ecosystems: a browser-based platform for interactive artificial life research.
The setup: several small CNNs share a 2D grid, each seeing only a 3x3 neighborhood. No global plan. They compete for territory by attacking neighbours and defending against incoming attacks, learning via gradient descent online while the simulation runs.
What we didn't expect was the role of the learning itself. Gradient descent isn't just optimising each species' strategy. Instead, it acts to stabilize the whole system during simulation. Species that overextend get pushed back by the loss. Species that stagnate get nudged to grow. This means you can push parameters toward edge-of-chaos regimes: a zone characterised by emergent complexity. Letting the neural networks learn acts to hold the complex system together while you explore and interact.
The platform lets you steer all of this interactively. You can draw walls to create niches, erase parts of the system online, and tune 40+ system parameters to explore the most interesting configurations. We find it mesmerizing to watch species carve out territories and reorganise when you perturb them.
Everything runs client-side in your browser, no install needed.
Blog: pub.sakana.ai/digital-ecosys…
Code: github.com/SakanaAI/digital-…
This is some very cool work that builds on our original Petri Dish NCA (pub.sakana.ai/pdnca), using population-based meta optimization to enrich the complexity of the system.
Their paper and website are both very excellent: pbt-nca.github.io/
"That feeling" of typing out a plan prompt for Claude that you couldn't fall asleep with last night because it was rattling around in your head.
Several paragraphs, many enumerations, verbose instructions.
Finally hitting enter and sipping on coffee feels so much like sci-fi.
Conversations about the impact of agentic work on humans is largely doomerist, and I dislike that.
An unexpected positive is that I'm now required to design, think deeply, and articulate clearly what I want a system to do. This feels a lot like studying and learning.
Here's another with a different set of hyper-params. Again, super interesting how the different functional layers of the Continuous Thought Machine tend to occupy different spatial structures.
Mostly, though, I'm showing off the fun and useful visualization we've built. Pretty!
My updated Continuous Thought Machine v2's neural activation patterns can be so mesmerizing. This CTM has 4 separate dedicated layers (input, attention, output, and motor control). It turns out that they learn to occupy local spaces in 2D UMAP space, just like... brain regions??
Luke Darlow retweeted
Robert Lange @RobertTLange from @SakanaAILabs on ShinkaEvolve -- an open-source framework combining LLMs with evolutionary algorithms for scientific discovery, with insane sample efficiency.
His thesis that current systems optimise solutions to fixed problems. Going forwards -- real scientific discovery requires co-evolving the actual problems.
By the way - NVIDIA GTC is coming and will showcase breakthroughs in physical AI, AI factories, agentic AI, and inference. Register for virtual GTC for free using my link: nvda.ws/4qQ0LMg and enter raffle to win a DGX Spark 😈
Things you should use LLMs for on the regular as an AI Research Scientist:
- Upgrade your experiment visualization tactic (I do this once every 2 weeks). See more. Know more. Do more.
- Squeeze those GPUs. Evaluate. Streamline. Speed.
- Rethink assumptions. Unearth. Validate.








