I write about political lawfare—the strategic use of law to achieve political goals. My focus is practical: helping people understand legal tactics.
United Kingdom
Joined May 2022
- Tweets6.3K
- Following403
- Followers1K
- Likes19.9K
Pinned Tweet
Big news — my book is finally out!
Practical Guides — Lawfare is now available via Imperium Press. This has been a long journey, and I’m proud to finally share the result.
👉 imperiumpress.org/shop/pract…
Your support genuinely means a great deal.
I broadly agree with this but have my own experience of this problem.
reactionaryreadinglaw.substa…
"At a private lunch to discuss the jobs crisis last week, one employer admitted to axing work experience places because managers who work from home simply don’t want to go to the office to help..."
Lucy Burton argues the youth unemployment crisis isn’t about lazy Gen Zs refusing to get out of bed. It is the lazy middle-managers 👇
telegraph.co.uk/business/202…
Christian Dating Has a Problem with Lust — and It Isn't Just Men's, by @LawReading reactionaryreadinglaw.substa…
I love it when people tell me what they think of my stuff.
You're 100% right that the practicalities of remigration haven't been thought through at all. Sellner et al seem to think that it's a simple task once you have control of the reigns of the state, it isn't.
I think you underplay the culture issue though. Britain is already at the foreign % of Singapore under LKY who recognised that assimilation was impossible and that a new identity must be created. This went as far as everyone abandoning their ancestral languages.
Only going further beyond that are we realistically I think going to see separate laws for different groups, a neo-millet system. The ottomans when they founded their millets were ~60% Muslim and they moved closer to ethnogenesis policies as that Muslim percentage increased over time.
Le Bon writes about the ethnogenesis of France following Paris' conquest of the nation, and again following the changes brought on by 1789, well worth reading and then looking at the attempts to immitate that process in Algeria and Indo-China.
Beyond Integration: Multiculturalism, Assimilation and Remigration, by @LawReading reactionaryreadinglaw.substa…
Though I understand where you’re coming from, most women will not be able to judge a man’s capacity for violence or his potential to break hearts immediately, partly because women are generally not exposed to violence in the same way men are. Men who are reluctant to engage in conflict or ‘stand up for themselves’ are not necessarily weak; they may simply be streetwise enough to understand when it is wiser to walk away. There is often a failure to recognise the difference between wisdom and weakness.
When it comes to heartbreak, there is a similar misconception. Many women seem to entertain a sort of Christian fantasy of a man who possesses the charm and ability to seduce numerous women but consciously chooses not to exercise that ability. The problem with this ideal is that most men are not naturally capable of seducing large numbers of women without making a deliberate effort to develop the necessary skills and actively pursuing such opportunities. Although some men may have a natural predisposition towards charm or seduction, the ability to attract and seduce numerous women is not simply an inherent capacity that a man must choose to restrain. It is often something that requires experience, effort and deliberate action in the first place. Consequently, the distinction between a man who could break numerous hearts but chooses not to and a man who lacks the inclination or ability to do so is not always adequately understood.
Some say that women don't like nice guys, but we really just don't like weak men.
A lot of men who are very weak and unattractive consider themselves "nice guys" when they're really just incapable of taking advantage of women or doing anything aggressive. They don't go around breaking hearts or starting fights because they can't attract women or handle conflict with men.
As a way of coping with their weakness they'll think of themselves as "nice guys" and complain that women are only attracted to jerks. And by jerks they mean men who have the capability to transgress the kinds of boundaries that they're too weak to transgress.
This is also sometimes used as an insult against women ("women only like jerks, they hate nice guys") when women are actually reasonable to not be interested in weak men because a weak man can't protect his family.
Women do like men who are strong, assertive, and kind - that's the classic Prince Charming that practically every woman wants.
Some women will go for "bad boys" who may bring chaos into their life because an amoral strong man is still more attractive than a weak "nice guy".
ReactionaryReadingLaw retweeted
New essay on me Substack on hierarchy as pertaining to the Right!
sepeaeturnum.substack.com/p/…
When I’m given Lord protectorship of the realm I’m banning people from wearing T-shirts and suits!
This seems to be more common than it used to be?
A school assistant has been found guilty of grooming a 15-year-old pupil before taking him to her house and showing him her collection of sex toys and handcuffs.
🔗: telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
Interesting that the Conservatives are driving the youth membership in this way. (£6 membership)
Also interesting that the term young conservatives is used again, given its lineage.
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Georgia is always on her phone, and who can blame her when there are just so many messages coming through? Largely it's her own fault because there is nothing she loves more than setting up a group chat.
Every social occasion, however minor, deserves its own forum. Which is why her WhatsApp is a graveyard of past events: Year 3 Christmas Fair. Padel 4 Hot Mums. Mykonos 2024. Flo's baby shower. Jilly Cooper Book/TV Club. Name India's baby.
One is simply called Apples and she has no recollection of creating it.
She is forever adding people to groups, or removing them, should she feel the need. Her groups, her rules. Back in her single-gal heyday, she presided over girl boss-themed literary evenings, safe spaces for basic bitches, sexy supper clubs, and, her absolute fav, hen-dos.
✍️ Anonymous
Article | spectator.com/article/the-wh…
A question I asked months ago and should be pretty easy to answer. Is it only being asked by the lovely lady because it’s in her career interests to do so?
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Why Political Organisations Should Pay for Professional Work, by @LawReading reactionaryreadinglaw.substa…
Why Right-Wing Boomers Don’t Understand Modern Britain, by @LawReading reactionaryreadinglaw.substa…