Most things you complain about can be fixed with Bitcoin. Do the work.

Joined May 2023
For people who reject centralized roots of trust on principle (the Bitcoin maximalist position), BIP-353 is structurally unacceptable regardless of how well DNSSEC works. @spacesprotocol
24
Jameson Lopp on Bitcoin Block Space and the Case for Sovereign Naming💎 Jameson Lopp has described Bitcoin as a database whose protocol defines how users buy space and make updates. In a free-market, any use case that fits within those constraints and is paid for at the prevailing market rate is legitimate. The Spaces Protocol applies that principle to naming. It allocates short, human-readable identifiers through open auctions on Bitcoin, burns the bids, and anchors ownership so that no single party can revoke a claimed name after the fact. Lopp’s framing treats block space as a scarce resource priced by willingness to pay. Users who want to store data, open a channel, or register a name compete for the same limited capacity. The protocol itself does not rank uses. It only enforces the rules that keep the chain consistent and the supply of new coins fixed. Under that standard, a naming system that consumes modest on-chain data, settles through ordinary transactions, and leaves verification possible for anyone who follows the chain is simply another buyer of block space. Spaces meets those conditions. Top-level names are assigned by auction. The winning bid is burned. Subsequent handles under a claimed space are recorded off-chain in a Merkle tree whose root is committed to Bitcoin as a 32-byte hash. The resulting certificate proves inclusion and prior non-existence. Once the commitment confirms, the handle cannot be reassigned by the operator or by any third party. bitbane.com/jameson-lopp-on-… #Bitcoin #JamesonLopp #SovereignNaming #BlockSpace #SpacesProtocol
2
3
82
Replying to @BitcoinNewsCom
This guy will be loading up on bitcoin then admit he is wrong later because no AI can solve a hash to get to the original date period! If you understand what a hash is like Chamath does you would KNOW he is full of it!
6
8
2
151
6,877
This is what "you don't own your account" looks like - not in theory, not eventually, right now. Names anchored to Bitcoin. That's what we're building at @spacesprotocol
A Japanese manga artist lost his entire Google account forever after he uploaded private files from an old comic he drew to Google Drive. Google’s AI checked the files and flagged them as not allowed. He asked Google to review it again, but they rejected his appeal and banned the account immediately. He can no longer access years of his private drawings and lost access to many websites and services that used his Google login. The artist said this is very embarrassing and causes him a lot of trouble. He warned that it might not happen to people who always follow every rule, but others should be careful. So Google is scanning files that people upload to its cloud storage even if they are supposed to be private. I wonder how long they have been doing this.
2
2
6
770
Rising Bids on Spaces Protocol Show Growing Demand for Bitcoin Naming✌️ Activity on the Spaces Protocol continues to increase. On February 12, 2025, with Bitcoin at block height 883,435 and fees near three satoshis per virtual byte, the public explorer showed multiple open auctions and a cluster of unconfirmed bids. Names such as XP, VR, UV, and especially Punk drew repeated bids. One auction for Punk moved from 82,000 satoshis to 83,000, then 85,000, and finally an unconfirmed 100,000 satoshis as participants competed. Two-letter combinations also appeared more frequently. Punycode names sat near the claim window at lower amounts, some as low as 5,000 satoshis. Upcoming rollouts included additional short codes and other labels. The pattern indicates that more users are participating, often without public discussion of their activity. This quiet accumulation is consistent with how new naming systems historically develop. Early participants identify available short or meaningful labels, place bids, and wait for the claim period. Once a top-level space is registered, the owner controls the UTXO and can later issue handles underneath it. The protocol limits top-level spaces to roughly 3,600 per year, with the ten highest-bid names advancing daily from pre-auction to auction. Bids are burned, so no organization retains the proceeds.🔥 The design removes the incentive for a central registrar to favor certain buyers and keeps the process open to anyone who can submit a Bitcoin transaction. Human-readable names address a persistent friction in Bitcoin. Most addresses are long strings that are difficult to share verbally, easy to mistype, and impossible to verify by eye. A handle such as alice@bitcoin or cipher@punk is short enough to say aloud, print on a card, or display in a profile. Behind the handle the owner can publish a Bitcoin address, a silent payment address, a Lightning offer, Liquid or Ark details, a Nostr public key, social links, and other records. A wallet or application that resolves the name can present the appropriate payment method without the sender copying a long address. The name itself remains stable even when the records behind it change.🫡 Full Story👉 bitbane.com/rising-bids-on-s… #Bitcoin #Cipher #Punk #BitcoinLinktree
2
4
180
Spaces Protocol Is the Naming System Bitcoin Has Always Needed Bitcoin solved the problem of digital scarcity and self-custodial money. It didn’t solve the problem of human-readable identity. For more than fifteen years, Bitcoin users have been forced to share long, unmemorable addresses that look like random strings of characters. One wrong letter and funds are lost forever. At the same time, the broader internet has trained people to use short names for everything else. Email, social media, and websites all rely on simple handles. Bitcoin has lagged behind. Spaces Protocol changes that. It brings sovereign, human-readable names directly to Bitcoin without creating a new blockchain, without a separate token, and without requiring any changes to Bitcoin itself. A name such as alice@bitcoin becomes a permanent pointer that can link to a Bitcoin address, a Lightning offer, a Nostr profile, an X account, a website, and more. Once the name is properly issued and committed, no company, registrar, or government can take it away. The owner holds the keys. The proof lives on Bitcoin. bitbane.com/spaces-protocol-… #Bitcoin #BitcoinUX #BitcoinUI #SpacesProtocol #Naming #Social
2
4
80
Live Spaces Auctions and Rollouts Show Bitcoin Naming Is Already Moving. Bitcoin sat near 99,000 dollars with low fees and a quiet mempool. In that same window the Spaces Protocol continues to record real activity. Bids land on names. Transfers settle. New sets of identifiers roll out on Bitcoin block time. The short daily update titled “Navigating the World of Bitcoin” captures one of these ordinary days: multiple bids on punycode strings, double-letter names drawing attention, a triple-zero entry advancing, and fresh rollouts that include ordinary words alongside encoded international characters. The activity is small in absolute terms, yet consistent. It demonstrates that people are already treating Bitcoin as the root for human-readable names rather than waiting for a future release. Spaces Protocol is a naming system built directly on Bitcoin. Top-level spaces function as community identifiers. Roughly 3,600 of them can be distributed each year through open auctions. Anyone can bid. The highest bid at the close of the auction wins. The proceeds are burned so no foundation or company receives the money. Once a space is won, its owner can issue sub-handles such as alice@bitcoin or curious@bitcoin. Most of those handles are created off-chain and grouped into a Merkle tree. Only a 32-byte root is committed to Bitcoin. The holder receives a certificate and an inclusion proof. Anyone can check that proof against the confirmed root. The name does not expire. No registrar can refuse renewal or seize the record after the root is on chain. bitbane.com/live-spaces-auct… #Bitcoin #BitcoinAuctions #BuildOnBitcoin #MerkleTree #InclusionProof #zkTLS #RootOfTrust #SpacesProtocol
1
3
67
ONE NAME
1
1
3
73
Empty Bitcoin Mempool? Why Spaces Protocol Is the Real Activity Bitcoin Needs When the Bitcoin mempool nearly clears out, something fundamental is happening on the network. Fees drop to a few sats per virtual byte. Blocks fill with almost nothing. Yesterday the queue of unconfirmed transactions sat near empty, with only a few thousand transactions waiting roughly four blocks of activity. For a protocol built on proof-of-work and open settlement, that silence raises a practical question: if almost no one is using the base chain for meaningful work, what is Bitcoin actually doing right now? The observation in the video “BITCOIN SPACES | EMPTY MEMPOOL” is straightforward. An empty or near-empty mempool is not automatically good. High usage on the base layer means people are settling value, registering ownership, and anchoring important data under Bitcoin’s security model. Low usage can signal that most activity has moved elsewhere. Second-layer systems such as Lightning handle high-volume payments well, and they reduce pressure on the chain. That is useful. But for long-term wealth storage and for any claim that needs to remain independently verifiable for years, the base layer still matters. A name or identity that lives only on a layer or a company database can be frozen, changed, or removed. A name anchored to Bitcoin cannot. Spaces Protocol exists to put useful, lasting activity back on the base chain without bloating it. It is a naming system native to Bitcoin. Top-level spaces (community identifiers such as @bitcoin) are distributed through open auctions held on the Bitcoin blockchain itself. The highest bids win. The proceeds are burned via OP_RETURN so no foundation or company keeps the money. The burn makes Bitcoin slightly more scarce for everyone who already holds it. Sub-handles (examples: alice@bitcoin or curious@bitcoin) are issued under a top-level space. Most of the data stays off-chain in a Merkle tree. Only a 32-byte root is committed to Bitcoin. One small commitment can cover hundreds, thousands or millions of handles. The on-chain footprint stays tiny even as the number of names grows large. bitbane.com/empty-bitcoin-me… #Bitcoin #BitcoinHandle #OpReturn #32byte #Spacesprotocol
2
1
4
41
Nacho is the mobile keystore that issues and manages sovereign Bitcoin names on Spaces Protocol. It's not a traditional wallet. It holds the keys for your handles so you can register a name, attach records, and prove ownership against Bitcoin without sending or receiving coins. In this episode we walk through how Nacho works today and why Spaces Protocol is positioned to become the default naming standard on Bitcoin. A handle like curious@bitcoin is issued under a top-level Space. The top-level Space itself (such as @bitcoin) is won through an open auction on Bitcoin. Verify yourself: explorer.spacesprotocol.org/… Once the handle is issued, the operator commits a 32-byte root on Bitcoin that proves the handle exists in the set. The handle owner receives a certificate that lets anyone verify ownership against that root. Once issued, the name is non-revocable. No registrar, no yearly fee and no authority can take it away if you hold the keys. ✍️Why Nacho is a keystore rather than a wallet, and how a single seed phrase backs multiple handles ✍️Adding records (Bitcoin address, Lightning, Nostr npub, website, socials) that resolve to one name verified on Bitcoin ✍️Upcoming bidirectional verification with zkTLS so linked X, Telegram, or GitHub accounts can be checked without trusting a central server ✍️The new explorer that indexes both on-chain roots and off-chain records ✍️Why Spaces succeeds where earlier naming systems did not: open auctions with burned bids, no premine, and Bitcoin as the sole root of trust Spaces does for naming what Bitcoin did for money. Names live off-chain for scale, but every proof is checked against Bitcoin. No middleman can freeze or revoke what the chain has confirmed. youtu.be/5lo_shdgdr0 #Bitcoin #zktls #spacesprotocol #index #bidirectional #nost #lightning #nacho #keystore #handle
2
2
4
172
🔥
I now own a name ON btc using @spacesprotocol Not a domain or a username. A name I hold like a coin. Why that matters: Today you pay someone by pasting this:
bc1pknhdaw3jyhvcalyrkulw2hwmqvc5q65ch9gkpnvvhrfajyedjgvqmn3w0c
62 characters. Terrible. Names fix that but the names we have are rented. A registrar keeps the record, and a chain of companies and governments sits above it. They can drop you from it at any time. Spaces puts the name on Bitcoin itself: • @bitsaga is a small Bitcoin coin & only my key can move it.
• rob@bitsaga is a handle I issued myself. One 32-byte fingerprint on Bitcoin covers all handles I might attach.
• It points to a silent payment address, so every payer gets a fresh private address ^^ How does a wallet trust the answer? It does not trust, it checks. A relay hands over a proof (about 3 KB). The wallet verifies it against Bitcoin. The relay can be slow or offline but it cannot lie. I run my own relay at spacesrelay.bitsaga.be, on my own node. I resolved rob@bitsaga through it and checked the answer against my own node. Same address, two names:
- rob@bitsaga.be, found through DNS (BIP 353)
- rob@bitsaga, found through Bitcoin (Spaces) Cost: 6,882 sats in network fees. I renew it once a year. BUT: almost no wallet reads Spaces names yet. It is very early. So I wrote it all down, with the commands to check it yourself on your own node. Full article on the website:
1
3
315
It’s funny how much modern professional sports remind me of the Roman Colosseum and gladiatorial games. Since discovering Bitcoin in 2020, I haven’t played fantasy football. I barely watch the NFL anymore. I couldn’t tell you much about my hometown team, its players, trades, or even how the season is going. And frankly, I couldn’t care less. What’s more interesting is my reaction when someone starts talking about football at a party. I almost immediately lose interest. Sometimes I even catch myself judging them. I’ve wondered why. I think Bitcoin fundamentally changed my hierarchy of what deserves my attention. It opened the door to monetary history, central banking, geopolitics, capital markets, incentives, and eventually a much broader understanding of the forces shaping society. Once you start understanding how the game actually works, it’s difficult to get excited about watching another game. And that’s where the Roman Colosseum analogy becomes interesting. Millions of people can explain the intricacies of a defensive formation, recite player statistics, debate trades, and spend countless hours analyzing the performance of their favorite teams. Yet many couldn’t explain how the Federal Reserve operates, how money is created, or why their purchasing power continues to erode. We’ve developed extraordinary expertise in entertainment while remaining remarkably ignorant about the systems that govern our economic lives. Bread and circuses. Now, I recognize there’s a danger in that perspective. Enjoying football doesn’t make someone intellectually inferior or oblivious to the world. People need entertainment, community, and opportunities to disconnect. And Bitcoin has its own Colosseum. Influencers, tribal rivalries, personality conflicts, price predictions, and endless arguments over who’s winning and losing. You can abandon one spectacle only to become consumed by another. Perhaps that’s the real distinction. Are we investing our attention in understanding the world around us, or simply finding increasingly sophisticated ways to distract ourselves from it? I don’t begrudge anyone their Sunday football. But I do wonder how different society might look if people devoted even a fraction of the energy they spend understanding professional sports to understanding the monetary and political systems shaping their children’s futures. Because unlike football, we’re all playing in that game, whether we understand the rules or not.
If you know the rules to football but do not know when & why the federal reserve was created, the banking cartels did exactly what they planned.
28
24
8
185
10,188
I now own a name ON btc using @spacesprotocol Not a domain or a username. A name I hold like a coin. Why that matters: Today you pay someone by pasting this:
bc1pknhdaw3jyhvcalyrkulw2hwmqvc5q65ch9gkpnvvhrfajyedjgvqmn3w0c
62 characters. Terrible. Names fix that but the names we have are rented. A registrar keeps the record, and a chain of companies and governments sits above it. They can drop you from it at any time. Spaces puts the name on Bitcoin itself: • @bitsaga is a small Bitcoin coin & only my key can move it.
• rob@bitsaga is a handle I issued myself. One 32-byte fingerprint on Bitcoin covers all handles I might attach.
• It points to a silent payment address, so every payer gets a fresh private address ^^ How does a wallet trust the answer? It does not trust, it checks. A relay hands over a proof (about 3 KB). The wallet verifies it against Bitcoin. The relay can be slow or offline but it cannot lie. I run my own relay at spacesrelay.bitsaga.be, on my own node. I resolved rob@bitsaga through it and checked the answer against my own node. Same address, two names:
- rob@bitsaga.be, found through DNS (BIP 353)
- rob@bitsaga, found through Bitcoin (Spaces) Cost: 6,882 sats in network fees. I renew it once a year. BUT: almost no wallet reads Spaces names yet. It is very early. So I wrote it all down, with the commands to check it yourself on your own node. Full article on the website:
12
13
4
38
2,805
Bitcoin Community Identifiers A Bitcoin address is a name that forgot to be a name. It is sixty-two characters, a checksum, and a prayer that the paste survived. People send life savings through that string because nothing better sat on Bitcoin. Spaces Protocol is the missing name. A space is a community identifier, held as a coin. A handle under it is a person, a shop, or a node that a stranger can say out loud. The auctions are open. The bids burn. The proof checks against the chain. Community identifiers, not rented domains The video “Bitcoin Spaces are Community Identifiers” starts from the comparison that actually matters. A space is the Bitcoin version of a top-level name. @bitcoin sits where .com sits, except the record is a UTXO. The key that can spend the output is the key that owns the name. There is no registrar renewal desk above it. About 3,600 spaces are released each year. Ten a day move from pre-auction to a ten-day auction. Anyone can bid. A last-minute bid extends the clock, so sniping does not win by default. The winner claims the output. After that, the name moves like any other coin: transfer it, hold it, or hand the operator role to another key. The cap is the product. A namespace with no limit fills with lookalikes. A namespace with a daily auction makes a short name cost attention. Early rollouts in that video were still cheap. A name like @4k cleared around 4,000 sats. Numbers and punycode were going for less, because almost no one was bidding. @karma, @ye, @uk, @matrix, @cipher, @happy were on the board or just off it. That window is the point of the video. The mechanism was live. The crowd was not. The names that look obvious later are the ones nobody fought for while the mempool was empty. bitbane.com/bitcoin-communit… #Bitcoin #Spacesprotocol #Namespace #Video #Product #Limit
2
4
151
Interesting
I now own a name ON btc using @spacesprotocol Not a domain or a username. A name I hold like a coin. Why that matters: Today you pay someone by pasting this:
bc1pknhdaw3jyhvcalyrkulw2hwmqvc5q65ch9gkpnvvhrfajyedjgvqmn3w0c
62 characters. Terrible. Names fix that but the names we have are rented. A registrar keeps the record, and a chain of companies and governments sits above it. They can drop you from it at any time. Spaces puts the name on Bitcoin itself: • @bitsaga is a small Bitcoin coin & only my key can move it.
• rob@bitsaga is a handle I issued myself. One 32-byte fingerprint on Bitcoin covers all handles I might attach.
• It points to a silent payment address, so every payer gets a fresh private address ^^ How does a wallet trust the answer? It does not trust, it checks. A relay hands over a proof (about 3 KB). The wallet verifies it against Bitcoin. The relay can be slow or offline but it cannot lie. I run my own relay at spacesrelay.bitsaga.be, on my own node. I resolved rob@bitsaga through it and checked the answer against my own node. Same address, two names:
- rob@bitsaga.be, found through DNS (BIP 353)
- rob@bitsaga, found through Bitcoin (Spaces) Cost: 6,882 sats in network fees. I renew it once a year. BUT: almost no wallet reads Spaces names yet. It is very early. So I wrote it all down, with the commands to check it yourself on your own node. Full article on the website:
12
$300k BTC is reachable in this next "cycle." This would correspond to a roughly $10T crypto market cap with 60% BTC dominance. BTC would be fairly valued at this price according to a logarithmic regression to the crypto market cap historical data.
11
2
30
3,648