@StanfordCISAC postdoc || non-resident scholar @carnegienpp || socio-technical analyses for nuclear, quantum, and “emerging” tech || PhD from @CISSMaryland

Joined September 2011
Done on this platform. Find me on the other w/ the same handle.
2
4
495
Lindsay Rand retweeted
Applications are now open for the Nuclear Security Fellows Program at @MIT. We are looking for the next generation of thought leaders in nuclear security by supporting research that will advance policy-relevant understanding of the subject. Fellowships are available for pre-doctoral and post-doctoral scholars and for junior faculty. Applications are accepted through December 6, 2024 and decisions will be announced in January 2025. Learn more: ssp.mit.edu/about/fellowship…
8
1
19
9,938
Congrats! Very well deserved!
I'm incredibly honored to receive the 2025 @APSphysics Joseph A. Burton Forum Award! The Award recognizes “outstanding contributions to the public understanding or resolution of issues involving the interface of physics and society.” @PrincetonSPIA aps.org/funding-recognition/…
2
3
352
Russia is developing nuclear-armed satellites to destroy other satellites. When this news broke, it struck me as not good. The more I think about it, the worse it becomes. My latest for @CarnegieEndow, @carnegienpp: "Space Nukes Are Bad." carnegieendowment.org/posts/…
28
97
19
263
52,140
It’s disturbing to see gatekeeping around who can engage in existentially important issues. We need humility and a willingness to learn from one another to improve. Promote dialogue over dismissal-growth comes from understanding different perspectives, even when we disagree.
This quoted post is unavailable.
3
4
50
4,058
Israeli retaliation against Iranian nuclear facilities would likely prompt Iran to threaten and potentially invoke Article X to withdraw from the NPT, regardless of whether Iran decides to pursue weaponization or not.
14
95
33
277
113,311
Lindsay Rand retweeted
🚨 New piece out in the @IntlStudiesRev! I discuss the different barriers that junior international scholars face to participate in knowledge production. This includes epistemological biases and barriers, citizenship/visa issues, & financial obstacles. academic.oup.com/isr/article…
8
57
6
196
48,244
Me in @ArmsControlNow on how the next U.S. administration should manage its nuclear relationship with China in the sadly inevitable absence of talks with Beijing. armscontrol.org/act/2024-09/…
2
11
2
29
8,493
Lindsay Rand retweeted
Nuclear weapons alone cannot solve the political issues of deterrence and assurance. How is the US-ROK alliance’s (over)reliance on nuclear weapons impacting the US’ various aims on the Korean Peninsula? Read my latest in @38NorthNK @carnegienpp👇🏽
3
5
2
19
7,993
Should AI be included in nuclear policy talks? Overly broad discussions of AI might worsen existing tensions within the nuclear policy community & hinder efforts at nuclear risk. Productive dialogue on AI should be focused, cautious, & technically informed, argues @LRand11 👇 carnegieendowment.org/posts/…
2
4
2,010
One of the few things that NPT diplomats agree on right now is the importance of discussing AI in high-level nonproliferation and nuclear risk-reduction dialogues. But is this actually a good idea? Here's @LRand11's trenchant take. carnegieendowment.org/posts/…
1
3
1
24
12,177
AI came up a lot at the NPT prep comm. While I think the AI-nuclear convergence merits attention, we need to be cautious of what forums, people, and topics shape the dialogue. Otherwise we risk increasing hype and reducing much-needed consensus. My take: carnegieendowment.org/posts/…
1
15
39
8,301
So happy to see @carnegienpp holding the New Voices, New Ideas Conference again this year. Thanks to @kyl_elise and the rest of the NPP team for making space to bring new voices and new ideas into the nuclear policy community
3
17
1,875
This was a fantastic report. Highly recommend if anyone wants to get geared up amidst the Sentinel furor
Replying to @mattkorda
As I wrote in my report on Sentinel, if you project costs out to a different year (i.e. 2050 or 2100), then you likely get a different result (life-extending MMIII being cheaper than pursuing Sentinel ASAP). Yet they keep sticking with 2070/2075 instead. man.fas.org/eprint/siloed-th…
1
1
7
1,459
Had the pleasure of writing a short op-Ed for ⁦@PhysicsToday⁩ with my ⁦@StanfordCISAC⁩ colleague, ⁦@barbaracrusan⁩, on the importance of holding scientists accountable for their role in weapons production pubs.aip.org/physicstoday/ar…
1
6
1
11
1,566
For more on this topic, check out the work @PhysCoalition is doing
1
1
188