Director @ICDS_Tallinn, Adjunct Professor @UniTurku. Passionate about international politics and security, feeling home in Estonia, Finland and at sea.

Talsinki
Joined February 2014
During the past week, Trump has been pushing Europe to choose between the US and Ukraine. Should Europe side with Trump in pushing Ukraine to surrender, or side with Ukraine in standing up against Trump? The choice should be obvious. 🇺🇦
2
30
2
237
3,609
What makes democratic renewal possible? In a fireside chat at #opensocietyforum2026, @kristiraik and @daniel_freund highlight the power of grassroots movements, bringing people together and strengthening European cooperation. Democracy needs active citizens and a stronger Europe.
4
6
602
My main point here: this was not the last deal that Trump wishes to make with Putin at the cost of Europe's security. Europe's priority has to be blocking such deals, which is not achieved by demanding a "seat at the table" where they are made. err.ee/1610163379/kristi-rai… #ERR
4
36
1
232
8,692
Kristi Raik retweeted
I recently sat down for a live interview with Kaupo Rosin, chief of the Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service. Here are some key takeaways from our conversation on Russian threats, sabotage, and intelligence. 🧵 balticflank.substack.com/p/i…
5
66
6
184
49,310
Kristi Raik retweeted
Have you all seen Trump’s announcement of his SUPER PUTIN DEAL? Russia promises to immediately supply more than 300,000 tonnes of diesel to the market, including the US, followed by another 500,000 tonnes in November. Then come promises of EVEN BIGGER volumes. Because the deal has to be HUGE. At least in the post. OFAC, of course, wasted no time issuing a temporary waiver until April 7 to accommodate the president’s latest “GENIUS” deal. Except the BIG DEAL is not actually that big. More of a stage prop. Very Trump. Let’s do the maths. Actual numbers. TERRIBLE, I know. 300,000 tonnes is roughly 2.2 million barrels of diesel. 500,000 tonnes is roughly 3.7 million barrels. In September, Russia managed to export just 0.1 million barrels. Basically none, as there is export ban. So Putin has already “sold” Trump a volume 22 TIMES larger than Russia’s entire September exports. Making promises is, of course, easier than rebuilding refineries after Ukrainian strikes. MUCH EASIER. SOME SAY THE EASIEST. Meanwhile, Russia’s diesel export ban remains in force until October 31: the fuel is needed domestically, and Ukrainian drones have significantly reduced Russia’s ability to produce it. A VERY SUCCESSFUL phone call with Trump is unlikely to have fixed those problems. Now for another comparison. Russia’s average monthly diesel exports last year were 18.3 million barrels. The promised deliveries amount to just 12% and 20% of that volume, respectively. So we have a promise that Russia still needs to find a way to fulfil, given the state of its refineries. And even if delivered, it looks considerably less impressive than the presidential CAPS LOCK. Not quite THE GREATEST DEAL IN HISTORY. The political logic is clear. The war with Iran and high fuel prices are a bad backdrop for the elections. One would hope politically FATAL, at this point. The administration desperately needs a story about how the president is about to FIX EVERYTHING. Preferably IMMEDIATELY. Preferably without explaining how we got here in the first place. So perhaps the main product of this deal is not even diesel. It is another attempt to calm the market with a BIG, BEAUTIFUL ANNOUNCEMENT. Let’s see how much credibility these announcements still have. Russia, of course, will sell this as a HUGE VICTORY. And why wouldn’t it? Promise diesel you still need to find somewhere, get a sanctions waiver UPFRONT. Plus another opportunity to tell the world that it simply CANNOT MANAGE WITHOUT RUSSIA. But what worries me most is that this spectacle could weaken our European partners’ resolve. Trump’s latest “breakthrough” must not become an excuse to ease sanctions pressure on Russia — precisely when that pressure needs to INCREASE. Of course, this decision will benefit Russia by generating additional revenues. We’ll be watching how much of its export capacity Russia actually manages to restore. One thing is CLEAR: Ukrainian strikes on Russian refineries need to INTENSIFY.
272
2,103
215
8,889
1,390,992
I think it’s better to work on the common ground than stay annoyed.
what's annoying is that for 30+ years B3 warned western Europe about Russia. Now "old West" has (mostly) woken up and says "yes we get it, Russia's a problem, and you know what, you guys are toast".
1
4
36
2,017
At a security conference in France. Lots of questions to Baltic participants about 1. the Russian threat 2. how we (Europe) should prepare to defend ourselves without the U.S. if need be. No one questioning that Russia is a threat and Ukraine needs to be supported. Merci.
5
27
3
204
16,718
P.S. No doubt it is easy to find different views in France on Russia and Ukraine. But talking to the security crowd shows a major shift in French thinking. Still obsessed with strategic autonomy but now it has to include defending Europe against Russia.
1
4
2
38
2,697
Note that Estonia’s attribution comes together with a response that imposes a cost on those responsible and deters further attacks. Message to Russia: it’s not worth trying again.
Attribution of the Milrem Arson Attack to Russian Security Services
9
60
4,109
Kristi Raik retweeted
Replying to @thetimes
@thetimes provides a helpful reality check regarding the warnings about a potential Russian attack on #NATO. With comments by @ICDS_Tallinn best experts 🙂 @MarekKohv
Is Russia planning to attack Nato? What defence chiefs truly think. thetimes.com/article/f65a321…
10
1
32
3,160
Kristi Raik retweeted
Allies need to make sure that the burden-shifting process within NATO does not at any point of time undermine credible deterrence and military readiness. We need to develop an Alliance that is both more European and stronger. — @KristiRaik | #ABCDTallinn key message
4
18
896
Many questions from western journos coming in again on whether Russia is about to attack us. And, how come the Baltic states are now calming down talk about the Russian threat? We Balts used to be seen as Russophobes and fearmongers, always warning about Russia. 1/
6
71
11
337
55,949
There are still no signs of Russia preparing a full-scale invasion of any NATO country. How about a minor incursion then, a small landgrab? Hard to see what it could achieve by doing that. No doubt Russia’s neighbours, together with allies, are ready to hit back immediately. 4/
4
9
1
106
7,064
With winter approaching, Europe needs to keep its focus on supporting Ukraine and be calm and clear: Russia has nothing to gain by attacking NATO. We should not increase the risk of miscalculation in the Kremlin by panicky public debate. X
19
158
5,938