it's only a matter of time before sponsors start donating drones or paying mercs to win specific outcomes
real life hunger games
then you realize this all happens anyway at a high level
a moral people would outlaw this
POLYGLOBE JUST GOT ANOTHER MASSIVE UPGRADE 🌐
DeepStateLive’s Ukraine war map is now draped directly onto the globe, live and synced with @Polymarket .
Shaded control zones, shifting frontlines, Russian/Belarusian unit icons and direction of attack arrows all sitting under your markets and OSINT in near real time.
These Ukraine geo markets confuse people constantly. is it the city limits, the oblast, “enter” vs “capture all of”?
Now, when you hover a market, we draw the exact area of operation it resolves on and spell out the rule in plain English.
No more rule debates, no more guessing what actually settles.
The only way to monitor the situation.
also:
my point isn't whether there was crime involved anywhere, more so that even if there is
@SolportTom has been very transparent about everything compared to any other launchpad thus far
a lot of you deeply underestimate what religious extremism can do or lead to
regardless of what religion
hoping for the best resolution for all
ted talk time again and maybe a hot take
i've been noticing a lot of discussions around SUI's recent actions, and it's surprising to see how many people, including some prominent figures in the solana community, are defending what SUI has done
they're even drawing comparisons to the eth fork that happened years ago however, I think there's a critical distinction that needs to be highlighted here
freezing funds and potentially taking them back is a very different approach from executing a blockchain fork
freezing and reclaiming funds this way is essentially targeting individual transactions/users funds, which raises serious concerns about control and trust
on the other hand, a fork, while not perfect and certainly controversial, is a more structural change like hitting undo to the entire blockchain and while it’s not without its own issues, it doesn’t carry the same immediate risks of being weaponized or misused in ways targeted to harm/abuse users or the ecosystem from multiple angles
this kind of power could be dangerously exploited, especially if governments were to wield it as a weapon to target specific individuals or groups, suppress dissent, or enforce compliance by selectively freezing/reversing transactions
no one wants people to lose their money but a lot of people miss the nuances of decisions being made and how they are being made
thanks for reading