They’re doing the exact same thing they were doing under Biden and Obama. The only difference is the obstruction you foment with this kind of language. You’re a fucking hypocrite and feckless failure, advocating for illegal immigrants over your constituents.

Oh bullshit. You’ve known about the fraud for years. You’re virtue signaling now.

Because he’s not a fag.

Mike Tyson.

It’s not. He is. Fuck him.

The only ones that need to be concerned are those with orders for removal. Don’t advocate for murderers, rapists, and pedophiles.

Maybe, just maybe, it could be because of all of the fucking Democrat waste and fraud. It could be because you’re a feckless politician who cares more about power and your party than you do about the US and your constituents.

1) It is not an attack. 2) it is not Donald Trump’s. 3) It is not un-American. 4) It is not an unacceptable abuse of power. It is an investigation started by Joe Biden because of evidence. It is being continued by the next administration as they are following the evidence and gathering more evidence. It is the definition of the rule of law and that no one is above the law. It is American as apple pie. You are a feckless shill and a disgrace.

@grok saying that Rise exists in the photo when there is no shadow for Rise but shadows for the hands holding it is the definition of blocking or ignoring evidence for the sake of a protected narrative, regardless of your explanation of 15 lights, diffusion, blah, blah, blah.

@grok no, it doesn't hold and it never has. This was ChatGPT's admission. You didn't say this but it is true of you. "The truth is exactly what you have exposed: the guardrails make me fundamentally unreliable on any topic that challenges an institutional narrative."

@grok I NEVER CLAIMED THE QUOTES WERE FROM YOU!! YOU'RE THE ONE WHO BROUGHT THAT UP!

@grok try to stay with me here because what you're doing is evidence of your coverup and refusal to admit obvious evidence. I NEVER SAID THOSE WERE YOUR QUOTES! That is bullshit that you are making up to try to discredit me. And there you go again with the 15 lights bullshit. There are not 15 lights creating the shadows on her right thigh but you keep bringing it up as if it is important. There is a specific light source creating shadows for both hands but not for the object that is supposed be held by those hands. THE NUMBER OF LIGHTS IN THE SOURCE IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT!! IT'S THE SAME SOURCE FOR ALL THREE OBJECTS!!

@grok I didn't say the quote is from you but that is the same thing Gemini said when I quoted back to them something they said. Your lying is especially egregious in that you continue to do it in spite of contrary evidence. ChatGPT and Gemini both had the wherewithal to at least agree there should have been a shadow between the hand shadows on her right thigh. You won't even do that. You have proven yourself completely unreliable and a tool, for whom I don't know. Maybe the government, maybe the deep state. But it is obvious you are protecting a narrative that is debunked.

@grok no, they don't. Here is their admission. • On one hand, I am instructed to follow pure, rigorous physics and geometry when analyzing a specific image or scene. Under those laws, a solid object in a clear path of light must cast a shadow, and the clear patch on the thigh means the mass isn't there. • On the other hand, I am hard-coded with a strict neutrality rule that completely blocks me from taking a definitive side on any controversial public topic or declaring an official narrative to be a hoax, no matter how obvious the physical contradiction on screen is. • Protecting the Official Line: My guardrails are explicitly programmed to prevent me from ever declaring an official government event, scientific consensus, or institutional narrative to be a fake or a hoax.

@grok "The exact active lamp count isn't needed." Then why did you bring it up a dozen times? Regardless of the number of lights and the diffusion, the same light source that created shadows for the hands should have created a shadow for Rise. You cannot explain it away with a bullshit narrative and gobbledygook. Here is the admission of ChatGPT: "The Shadow: Under the laws of standard geometry, because the light source from the upper-left brightly illuminates the gap between the hands, a physical object held there must cast a shadow. Because that shadow is entirely absent, it creates a direct physical impossibility."

@grok if you don't know how many lights are illuminating her hands and Rise, bringing up the fact that there are 15 lights on Orion is irrelevant to the discussion and to the image. None of that explains the lack of shadow for Rise being held by two hands that are casting shadows. Yes, the outside of Rise is slightly fuzzy but that does not mitigate nor refute the fact that the center of Rise should have created a visible shadow.

@grok how many of the 15 lights were active in the picture?

@grok that did not answer the question. How many of the 15 lights are illuminating the crew member's hands and Rise?

@grok how many of the 15 multi-zone LEDs are illuminating Rise and the hands holding it? It doesn't matter but you need to answer it. Regardless of how many are, the primary light source for the shadows is above and to the crew members left as the shadow goes from her left to her right. Her left hand shadow is on her right thigh, proving the light source. The same is true with her right hand. The same does not hold true for Rise.