In our last Nobel Prize prediction (for Economics), we're adding three things to prior predictions: -- Economics-specific context modeling (Arna Wömmel) -- Field-first prediction (first step) -- Within the major fields, predicting the defining discovery and the candidate combination together (Second step) Here's our next bold bet for the Nobel Prize in Economic Science: Steven Berry Yale University New Haven, USA James Levinsohn Yale University New Haven, USA Ariel Pakes Harvard University Cambridge, USA "For the structural estimation of demand and market power in differentiated-product markets" More detailed results about tomorrow’s chemistry prediction here: github.com/Dawoon-Jeong0523/… Alternative results from simulated committee decisions here: xitter.cf/BastosCostaDavi/status…

The 2026 Nobel Prize in Physics went to Francis Halzen alone for his decisive contributions to the IceCube Neutrino Observatory and the discovery of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. Our bold bet on quantum simulators with ultracold atoms (Bloch, Cirac, Zoller) missed. Neutrino astronomy was on our list, with Halzen named, but at only 3.5% (14 of 30) due to bundling with co-nominees. We're carrying three fixes into our Chemistry prediction: Leaner lineups: AI committees now only nominate combinations they strongly support (10 of 30 Chemistry options are solo candidates) Patents as evidence: discoveries are now supported by both their defining papers and tied patents Additional sources: the profile cards are now one main source, weighed alongside prizes, news, predictions and the history of the prize, rather than the main evidence. Bibliometrics alone seem to miss some of what matters; for one, the value captured in patented technology. Otherwise we used the same framework: "science of science" profile cards (citation impact, defining works, technological translation, textbook reach, collaboration, and now the patents tied to each discovery) built from OpenAlex, PatentsView and Reliance on Science, fed into the Preseen.com forecasting engine. Here's our next bold bet for the Nobel Prize in Chemistry: Shankar Balasubramanian University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK David Klenerman University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK "For the development of sequencing-by-synthesis, the basis of next-generation DNA sequencing" More detailed results about tomorrow’s Chemistry prediction here: github.com/Dawoon-Jeong0523/… Alternative results from simulated committee decisions here: xitter.cf/BastosCostaDavi/status…

The 2026 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine went to Karl Deisseroth, Peter Hegemann, and Georg Nagel for their pioneering work on optogenetics. Our agent-based prediction models ranked optogenetics 6th (4% probability), which was lower than the leading prediction of GLP-1 at 24% — likely because they over-indexed on recent news rather than longer-term scientific impact. Interestingly, a parallel approach we tested did predict optogenetics (flagging Deisseroth and Hegemann, though not Nagel). That model leaned into "science of science" signals: citation impact, technological translation, textbook reach, and collaboration networks — drawing on OpenAlex, PatentsView, and Reliance on Science data, all distilled into discovery “cards” and fed into the Preseen.com forecasting engine that took that as primary evidence, alongside the broader universe of relevant data and signals available to that system. Full author profiles and results for medicine here: dawoon-jeong0523.github.io/A… Using that same prediction framework, here's our next bold bet for the Nobel Prize in Physics: Immanuel Bloch Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics Garching, Germany J. Ignacio Cirac Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics Garching, Germany Peter Zoller University of Innsbruck Innsbruck, Austria "for theoretical proposals and experimental realizations of quantum simulators using ultracold atoms in optical lattices" More detailed results about tomorrow’s physics prediction here: docs.google.com/document/d/1… Want to see the alternative predictions from yesterday’s model? We posted those here: linkedin.com/feed/update/urn…

Tomorrow, the Nobel Assembly announces the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Today, we're putting our prediction on record. Knowledge Lab’s simulated Nobel committee predicts that the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine will go to: Daniel J. Drucker University of Toronto Toronto, Canada Jens Juul Holst University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark Svetlana Mojsov The Rockefeller University New York, USA “for GLP-1 physiology and the development of incretin therapies for diabetes and obesity” This was the most likely outcome informed by deep agentic research across a wide range of data sources and analyses with Preseen, drawing upon Knowledge Lab’s own research, informed by 120 simulations of the Nobel Prize Committee’s deliberation process (xitter.cf/BastosCostaDavi/status…). More details here (docs.google.com/document/d/1…). We'll announce our prediction for each prize the day before it's awarded. These are bold bets. After the last prize drops, we'll open the hood: which approaches worked, which didn't, and what the horse race tells us. This is a part of larger experiments with Preseen.com to integrate science with forecasting complex human and collective decisions. Thanks to members of KLab: @BastosCostaDavi, Dawoon Jeong, Robbie Ward, Arna Wömmel, @ArjSabet, Huadong Xiong, and Julia Koschinsky.