Releasing soon Omarchy Universal Dashboard.
👉Instead of many plugins, one to do what you want.
👉 Build whatever you want from your harness
👉 Auto-cycle, Overlays, deterministic data refresh...
Sorry for the music. Omarchy has a real rock'n’'roll vibe 😇
cc @dhh
That's the way to go. Without forgetting one thing: browsing history. There is so much data behind that, either places.sqlite (for Firefox), or directly through a proxy that set up a dated "places of interest" in the Obsidian KM.
The other way would be a browser extension that will record also the active time passed on each URL to rate the interest of active reading of the web page.
Full use-case: let's say that you regularly browse Github projects. Based on the time passed on each one, your LLM could automatically inform you that a major update has been released without any instruction and/or configuration or "heartbeat/cron".
Definitely Obsidian is a nice datalake for LLMs.
LLM Knowledge Bases
Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So:
Data ingest:
I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them.
IDE:
I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides).
Q&A:
Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale.
Output:
Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base.
Linting:
I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into.
Extra tools:
I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries.
Further explorations:
As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows.
TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
/me developing an Openclaw/Hermes Agent in PHP with Laravel and NeuronAI.
Honestly, not so hard currently. But you need an external stack:
▶️ CliProxyAPI so you'll not have to code the Oauth of main LLM services
▶️ A python Textual wrapper for the console UI (yes, it does not exist in PHP).
Big difference with other agentic systems: it will be tailored to multi-teams and multi-agents cooperation.
Hermes did the opposite. Openclaw did everything but that's a mess.
Multiple teams, multiple agents. That's the goal.
But I know me, I will trash this project in one week, despite there is absolutely no difficulty 😂
Unpopular opinion : try-catch has always been a non-sense.
I don't know why it exists. And I don't know why ALL LLM pollute my code with that.
There is absolutely no good reason.
There are a lot debates about MCPs: are they useful or not? But I never see something in the comments.
There will be one unique MCPs, and it will not be called like that. It will be called an AI gateway.
Guys, we already had this move in the Security industry. This will be the same.
Currently building a full AI agent that:
1) Supports infinite teams of agents
2) Is fully managed from Obsidian (config, memory, tasks, Knowledge Management, etc.)
I use Pi Coding Agent, which is at the center between an agent and a SDK.
👉 It's so easy to develop the exact features you want with this project.
Pi + Obsidian = ♥️
The goals?
➡️ Manage everything from my Obsidian
➡️ Define Teams, Agents, prompts, skills, and even Pi extensions from there
➡️ Have multiple Teams (one for Dev, one to "build a company", one for my home automation and tasks, etc.) fully customizable. Infinite teams, infinite agents, infinite workflows.
➡️ Each team being manageable from Telegram or from Obsidian
Current stack
- Obsidian + TaskNotes + Local Rest API plugin
- Pi Agent without extension because I copy-paste code from various extensions to build one-unique extension for my own needs. It's a lot easier to have one unique repo to maintain.
- Tmux for terminal multiplexer because I want to have a screen where I see ALL exchanges within a team of agents
What is working now
1. ./launch.sh retrieve, from my remote Obsidian, the configuration of the team, launch tmux with splitted panes, and launch each agent of the team.
2. Each agent retrieves remotely his configuration (system prompt, model to use, skills, etc.)
3. Each agent contains a RCP server to communicate with others.
4. Long tasks are entered in TaskNotes by the leading agent, and affected to other agents as needed.
Why Pi?
👉Because it's an extremely simple SDK with a lot of extensions, so a lot of code samples.
👉 It's the first time, with AI, that I told to myself: "Ok, now I can do really everything I want".
SKY IS THE LIMIT 🚀
pi.dev/
Nice introduction to Pi Coding Agent.
I love Pi! ♥️
xitter.cf/Zenoware/status/202970…
Replying to @anshnanda
did an accessible guide about Pi for sexy people here
reading.sh/pi-is-the-coding-…
Video - Pi Coding Agent: RIP Claude Code & OpenCode!
This Opensource Coding Agent is just way better.
youtube.com/watch?v=hv0V0GJp…
Created a X community around Pi Coding Agent.
For those who are late, this is a minimal coding agent which can be extended easily. It already has many available packages to set up your own agent based on your exact needs and workflows.
Pi Agent is the future.
Replying to @shrwnsan @IndyDevDan
Get more info about Pi agent at pi.dev
You can install via AgentBox or npm like so:
npm install -g @mariozechner/pi-coding-agent
PS. Pi packages are like Claude /plugin. Check em out at pi.dev/packages for inspo
Unpopular opinion - One week on OpenClaw. This is not a software, it's a puzzle. I've rarely seen such a mess, starting from the doc.
Building with AI is nice, but it should be managed correctly. You can't do 100 commits a day and keeping the global coherence at the same time.
I built a project using React Native and TSX.
✅ The good: I learned a lot.
❌ The bad: I spent 150x more time fixing and refactoring types than building actual features. 😩
And no: AI is not more efficient with types, it's quite the opposite actually.
The ratio of RT of Taylor Otwell, founder of Laravel, is ridiculously low.
How do you explain that? 🤔
Unpopular #Laravel opinion: loadMissing() has been specially made for vibe coders.
"Hey, I don't know if it's loaded, let's loading it just in case!" 😇
Conspiracy theory: The multitude of ChatGPT models is just a smokescreen. One day, when only a single, all-knowing model remains, we'll realize AGI has quietly arrived and OpenAI price will skyrocket.
Sam Altman is a marketing genius.










