Nature, photography, science, data viz. Conservation Scientist at @RSPBScience with @CLR_Cambridge. Reluctant Twitter-er. Views expressed are my own.

United Kingdom
Joined June 2009
🌊 We’re hiring! Join @RSPBScience on an exciting new project exploring marine management scenarios across the UK’s seas. Work with scientists & policy experts to help shape marine conservation🐋🦀🐟 Apply here 👉 app.vacancy-filler.co.uk/sal… #ConservationJobs #MarineScience
46
Our latest piece of research is out! 🎉 We found that -hectare for hectare- solar farms managed with nature in mind can support a greater number of bird species & individuals than surrounding intensively managed arable land 🐦 @RSPBScience @CLR_Cambridge tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.…
66
5/6 #BOUasm24 #SESH3 | Results Onshore wind and solar had a small impact on bird habitat availability at the national scale because the footprint of infrastructure is small and the increases in habitat availability from NbS far outweigh the impact from renewable energy deployment
1
1
58
6/6 #BOUasm24 #SESH3 | Conclusions • Ambitious renewable deployment uses only a small fraction of land • Little cost to food production, GHG sequestration & most terrestrial birds • We could deploy more renewables without substantially contributing to future land challenges
1
53
Joshua Copping retweeted
There has been a rapid expansion in growing crops to produce biomethane as cleaner alternative to fossil fuels to help reach #NetZero But cultivating maize on drained peat emits 3x more #CO2 than it avoids by not using natural #gas says new @UK_CEH study: ceh.ac.uk/press/growing-key-…
2
7
8
1,165
Joshua Copping retweeted
ICYMI, we mapped opportunities for onshore renewables across the UK, and found that there's easily enough space to meet net zero energy targets without compromising other objectives from land: cell.com/cell-reports-sustai… Eagerly awaiting the government's Strategic Spatial Energy Plan
7
1
8
2,396
Joshua Copping retweeted
Great to Josh's hard work pay off with a publication. We reckon there is ample space for onshore renewables to be deployed without meaningfully impact food or nature. So, no excuse for development in silly places. As with all land-use decisions, we need to be strategic.
I’m pleased to share our newest paper: “Ambitious onshore renewable energy deployment does not exacerbate future UK land-use challenges”. cell.com/cell-reports-sustai… 1/8
2
4
536
New research from @Natures_Voice shows there is room for greater ambition on onshore wind and solar #energy deployment to enable the UK to transition towards much higher levels of #renewable energy.  community.rspb.org.uk/ourwor…
2
1
2
284
I’m pleased to share our newest paper: “Ambitious onshore renewable energy deployment does not exacerbate future UK land-use challenges”. cell.com/cell-reports-sustai… 1/8
1
2
1
7
1,119
So, what does this mean? The relatively small percentage of land required for renewables means we can steer the deployment of onshore renewables towards lower-grade agricultural land and away from sensitive wildlife areas and national parks. 7/8
1
61
In doing so, nature can be given suitable space to play a crucial role in our overall efforts to tackle climate change, underpin our food security through nature-friendly farming, and reach net zero emissions by 2050. 8/8
56