Britain’s chief Rabbi and his Board of Deputies are Genocide deniers. Now they seek to censor democratic debate in our country, on the basis of what - relationship building? Meaning Jews will be upset if Christians call Israel’s actions Genocide…? As the UN have in their recent report. The ICJ are investigating based on the complaint from South Africa, alleging Genocide and Apartheid (who better to call that last one), Netanyahu is a wanted war criminal, the evidence in front of us is overwhelming in all senses. But here’s thing, forget the G word, just look at the atrocities, committed daily, the vast destruction, the mass starvation, murder and injury, the targeting of aid workers, journalists (and civilians of course) and the targeting of children, the routine sexual abuse of children the UN just reported, the fact that Gaza has the most child amputees in modern history - there’s a terrible, terrible wrong in progress in Palestine and the world is simply watching. And Christians are supposed not to discuss this? The definition of Genocide arose after the second world war, for good reason. It’s used in relation to Israel and Palestine for good reason. But remove that word from the conversation and you still get the most abominable behaviour by a state on a civilian population, on an ethnic group - possibly since the second world war - certainly the longest running. Arguing about the legal definition of Genocide as pro Israeli voices do, or arguing that a court needs to make a ruling before we can call it - that’s perverse. Does the chief Rabbi have no moral code?