Johan Rasmusson 🇪🇺 Ⓜ️✝️✡️ retweeted
"De bistra nyheterna är att de nya pengarna har använts för att reparera hålen i Försvarsmakten. Försvarsminister Pål Jonson kallade det ett stambyte snarare än en fasadrenovering." dn.se/ledare/oscar-jonsson-h…
Johan Rasmusson 🇪🇺 Ⓜ️✝️✡️ retweeted
Externt försvar i all ära. Men när Frankrikes städer brinner och främmande makter redan använder kriminella och islamistiska nätverk i Europa börjar jag undra om fienden finns mitt ibland oss. Och om vi vågar försvara oss. Skriver i Fokus, öppen artikel
fokus.se/sticket/europa-rust…
Jan Blomgren reder ut begreppen inom området energi.
epochtimes.se/energiforsk-ga…
Johan Rasmusson 🇪🇺 Ⓜ️✝️✡️ retweeted
1/12 Europa håller på att upptäcka att välstånd inte är en naturlag. Under decennier byggde man politiska ambitioner på föreställningen att pengarna alltid skulle finnas. Samtidigt förändrades världen i grunden. Nu riskerar en giftig cocktail av ekonomiska och politiska misstag att slå tillbaka med full kraft. 🧵Häng med,skrämmande läsning. efn.se/nobelpristagaren-slar…
Johan Rasmusson 🇪🇺 Ⓜ️✝️✡️ retweeted
In an interview with the Danish newspaper Berlingske, Denmark’s former foreign minister Per Stig Møller recounts a highly compromising story about the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Navi Pillay.
In 2008, when Denmark faced problems in Pakistan (a car bomb exploded outside the embassy) because of the Muhammad cartoons, Denmark turned to the UN - including the then High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay.
On that occasion Pillay was completely dismissive of supporting Denmark. Her only recommendation to the foreign minister was to introduce censorship. That, she said, would prevent the problem in the future.
I find it shocking that an opponent of freedom of speech can be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Touché!
Så inte förvånande.
Mahmoud Abbas är nu inne på sitt 22:a år av sin första mandatperiod om fyra år.
Erkännandet av denna fredsälskande stat, känd för sin respekt för mänskliga rättigheter och demokrati, är @johanssonmorgan och @margotwallstrom juvel i den svenska utrikespolitiska kronan.
#svpol
🔥 RARE MOMENT OF TRUTH AT UNITED NATIONS: As world leaders used the UN podium to condemn Israel, we invited courageous Yemeni journalist @JustLuai to tell the truth: “Our problem in the Middle East is neither Israel nor the Jews. It is the Islamist dictatorships.”
Johan Rasmusson 🇪🇺 Ⓜ️✝️✡️ retweeted
This flag was waved today on the streets of New York. It is the flag of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades.
Do you know what is written on the flag?
It is a verse from the Quran, from the chapter on the spoils of war, verse 17:
“It was not you ˹Muslims˺ who killed them, the infidels, but it was Allah Who did so.”
The Palestinian cause was manufactured to cloak the same Islamic jihad that was waged against the world fourteen centuries ago and carried out by Muslims for thirteen centuries, erasing civilizations and occupying two-thirds of the old Christendom.
But in the twentieth century, barbaric Islamic jihad would not have worked in a new world governed by law, especially when carried out by a weakened nation that had lost its empire in 1924.
So Muslims invented Palestine as a vehicle for waging jihad against the Jews and retroactively invented a nation-state out of thin air and called it Palestine.
“It was not you, O Muslims, who killed the infidels, but it was Allah who did so.”
This is what Muslims believe happened on October 7.
This is the same Islam Imam Tawhidi wants you to believe is a religion of peace that was merely hijacked by some radicals.
Johan Rasmusson 🇪🇺 Ⓜ️✝️✡️ retweeted
Ja, vänligen förklara det, @elisabethtr :"Hur kan det mot denna bakgrund vara lättare att acceptera samarbete med Vänsterpartiet för att få till stånd en socialdemokratiskt ledd vänsterregering med dess ekonomiska agenda och utrikespolitik, trots en icke-socialistisk majoritet i riksdagen, än en borgerlig regering med stöd av Sverigedemokraterna?" expressen.se/debatt/debatt-d…
Johan Rasmusson 🇪🇺 Ⓜ️✝️✡️ retweeted
Ung Vänster uppmanar till demonstrationer mot Israel den 7 oktober, på årsdagen av den värsta massakern på judar sedan Förintelsen.
Vänsterpartiet är inte bara marinerat i antisemitism, terrorromantik och extremism. Varje parti som ger V direkt eller indirekt politiskt inflytande – inklusive C, S och MP – blir medansvariga för denna moraliska perversion.
Johan Rasmusson 🇪🇺 Ⓜ️✝️✡️ retweeted
In 1968, Poland’s communist regime launched an antisemitic campaign that drove much of the country’s remaining Jewish population into exile, including my own family. How was that possible in a system that officially claimed to outlaw antisemitism?
Because the regime changed the language, not the substance. The campaign was called “anti-Zionist,” but in practice “Zionist” functioned as a coded term for Jew. Anti-Zionism became the politically acceptable vocabulary through which antisemitism could again be expressed, legitimized, and enforced.
Today, the UK Green Party adopted a resolution equating Zionism with racism. It is a reminder that the linguistic mechanism perfected in 1968 has not disappeared: antisemitism can still be masked in the language of anti-Zionism.
Legitimate criticism of Israeli governments and policies is one thing. Turning “Zionist” into a slur, treating Jews as collectively suspect, or excusing intimidation and violence as “anti-colonial resistance” is something else entirely.
At that point, this is no longer principled political criticism. It is an old hatred dressed in a new ideological costume.
The lesson of 1968 is that antisemitism rarely speaks in its own name. It hides behind fashionable slogans, moral grandstanding, and ideological camouflage. But the target remains the same. We know where that road can lead. That is why it must be identified early, called what it is, and confronted before rhetoric once again turns into exclusion, fear, and violence.
Johan Rasmusson 🇪🇺 Ⓜ️✝️✡️ retweeted
Most people have no idea about the real history of Al-Aqsa Mosque, because they’ve only been fed the Islamic Palestinian propaganda version of events.
They believe that Al-Aqsa has always been Islam’s third holiest site, that it has belonged to Muslims since the dawn of time, and that Israel is the oppressor for merely existing near it.
None of that is true.
The Temple Mount in Jerusalem was the holiest site in Judaism for over a thousand years before Islam even appeared in history. It housed the First and Second Jewish Temples, the center of Jewish worship and pilgrimage.
When the Romans destroyed the Second Temple in 70 AD, they built pagan shrines over it, but its Jewish identity never disappeared.
In the 7th century Islam emerges and expands through conquest, and begins hijacking Jewish and Christian sites, prophets, and narratives.
At first, Jerusalem had no major significance in Islam. Muhammad never set foot there. There was no mosque. There was no pilgrimage. There was no Islamic history tied to the city.
But that changed during the brutal power struggle between Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan and Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr.
By the late 7th century, Islam was deeply divided. Abdullah ibn al-Zubayr controlled Mecca and Medina, the two holiest cities in Islam. And Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan, the Umayyad Caliph, controlled the Levant.
But Abd al-Malik had a problem, he didn’t want the people of the Levant traveling to Mecca for pilgrimage, because that would give power to his rival.
Abd al-Malik declared the Temple Mount as Alaqsa mosque that was mentioned in the quran, and he made it an alternative place of pilgrimage.
He ordered the construction of the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque to divert attention from Mecca.
And just like that, Islam manufactured a holy site for political gain.
The real Masjid Al-Aqsa referred to in the Quran was not in Jerusalem, it was between Mecca and Ta’if. There was no mosque in Jerusalem at the time. There was no Islamic presence there.
Yet, centuries later, after Islam had conquered the city, the Islamic narrative retroactively applied this Quranic verse to Jerusalem, again, for political convenience.
If Israel wanted to act like Islamic conquerors, it could have easily done to Al-Aqsa what Turkey did to the Hagia Sophia.
It could have converted the mosque into the Third Temple, banned Muslim prayer on the site, erased any trace of Islamic history, as Muslims did to Christian and Jewish sites throughout history.
But Israel didn’t do that. Israel allows Muslims to pray there freely. Israel protects Al-Aqsa, even as it is used to spread anti-Semitic propaganda and incite violence.
Yet, despite this, the world condemns Israel for merely existing in its own capital.
Beit al-Maqdis is the Hebrew name of the Temple Mount. For it to be Arabic, it has to be Al-Bayt Al-Muqaddas. The same applies to the city name Al-Quds. It refers to the Holy of Holies, nothing connected to Islam about it.
When the Arabs took the city, they used its Roman name Iliya’.
I’m sure Zohran thinks the story the Palestinians told him about all of this is indisputably authentic Arab and Muslim.
🎯🎯🎯
2020-talets viktigaste profession måste, med @_Stegra_ totala dikeskörning, vara "folkhögskoleprofessor".
Stegras VD Henrik Henriksson satt oemotsagd och häcklade Christian Sandström och Magnus Henrekson på scen i en debatt som leddes av @svtnyheter klarast lysande stjärna och @PK_Stockholm folkkäre ordförande Camilla Kvartoft.
Det var då begreppet "folkhögskoleprofessor" föddes. Som en förminskande och förklenande term.
Hade Vargas, @mikaeldamberg @IbrahimBaylan_ @BuschEbba lyssnat mer på @ChrisSandstrom och @henrekson hade dessa miljarder kronor kunnat göra klimat- och miljönytta på riktigt någon annan stans.
Tror att såväl statsförvaltning med AP-fonder som investmentbolag skulle må bra av en kombination av storstädning och utbildning (av de som överlever yxan).
#svpol
Johan Rasmusson 🇪🇺 Ⓜ️✝️✡️ retweeted
Why would a Muslim stab a random person on the streets of Europe, ram a car into a group of people, or deliberately crash a plane full of people?
We as human beings know we are not good enough, and we spend our life trying to redeem ourself through good deeds, thinking it will make the suffocating guilt go away.
Christianity for example offers a way out of guilt, a solution not based on your works but on Christ’s.
Salvation isn’t earned, it’s given. You accept that you can’t redeem yourself, because Christ already did everything on your behalf.
That means you’re free. Free to live, free to build, free to serve, free to love.
And when a Christian feels lost, broken, and in need of forgiveness, they can go to church, talk to a pastor or priest, and leave knowing they are forgiven.
Islam, on the other hand, doesn’t offer redemption, it weaponizes guilt.
Instead of providing salvation, Allah exposes you, holds your sins over your head, and threatens you with hellfire and torture in the grave.
The Quran is a book of threats, it bullies Muslims into obedience through fear, humiliation, and punishment.
So what happens when a Muslim seeks redemption? They try to be better Muslims.
They pray, fast, give to charity, go on Hajj, do everything Allah commands. But it never works.
No matter how much you pray, no matter how much you try, the guilt never goes away. Because deep down, every Muslim knows it’s not enough. Allah always demands more.
Allah loves those who die fighting against the infidels. That’s not an opinion, it’s in the Quran, in Hadith, in every lesson taught to children.
This is why Muslims, even the so-called "moderates," always hesitate to condemn terrorism. Because they know jihad is required by Allah. They might not be willing to commit it themselves, but they can't say it’s wrong.
So when a Muslim fails to reach peace through religious rituals, they have two choices:
Give up, stop being devout, and learn to live with the guilt, or commit to jihad, because that’s the only way to be true to yourself.
The Quran spells it out clearly: “Kill those who do not worship Allah or obey the Prophet” (9:29).
So when a Muslim embraces this identity fully, killing infidels isn’t just justified, it’s joyful.
It’s an act of saving yourself, obeying Allah, securing your eternity, finally escaping the crushing weight of guilt
This is why a Muslim can stab a random jewish person on the streets and feel nothing but satisfaction.
Because for the first time in his life, he finally believes he has done something worthy of redemption.






















