Ludic Explorer🤸🏻🔍 retweeted
Chasing the quiet moments before the world wakes up.
🌅 There’s something so grounding about watching the night slowly give way to the morning light.
#framesjournal
I have been practising Nofap at these times without knowing the significance of the time period. Navratri really boosts your spiritual practises so don't wanna miss the opportunity 😌
VC: instagram/i_win_it
Oh! new new ways of getting internet thrashing... One needs to be very careful sharing personal details online
Ludic Explorer🤸🏻🔍 retweeted
Hannah Ellis Petersen is the South Asia correspondent of The Guardian. Her reports on India get picked up by other newspapers, universities and think tanks abroad. So what she writes shapes how the world sees us. Here is what her work actually says.
1. During the Kumbh Mela, she called Hindu pilgrims "covid superspreaders". Crores of people came for a religious festival, and the headline made them the problem.
2. When the Supreme Court gave its verdict on Ram Mandir, she wrote about it as "thousands of mosques being disputed" while Hindu nationalists "rewrite India's history". A court verdict after decades turned into a warning story.
3. On CAA, the law gives a faster route to citizenship for Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians who fled religious persecution in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh. She described it through the "toxic masculinity" of Modi's politics.
Now she is covering the Cockroach Janata Party protest in Delhi, and again the protest gets the friendly treatment while the government gets the suspicious one.
Look at all of this together. Every story points the same way.
The Hindus facing violence in Bangladesh, and the welfare and digital payments that actually reach people in our villages, hardly get a mention.
If an Indian reporter covered Britain this way, would the Guardian call that reporting? Or would they call it an agenda?
A news outlet should report, not decide the story first.
Tired of watching chess games that drag on with endless defense and long tactical calculations?🥱
Meet Romantic Chess! ♟️🔥
Here, winning isn't enough. You want to win beautifully
Sacrifices, daring attacks, brilliant combinations, and breathtaking checkmates..
Because ..
1/2
Imagine closing your fingers, but each time you move, you cover only half the remaining gap. You keep getting closer, but there’s always a tiny gap left!
That’s Zeno’s paradox !
@kakouton2bro has build this 3D experience using Claude Opus 5.5
Ever wondered what happens when you crack your knuckles? 🤯🖐️
The familiar popping sound comes from changes occurring inside the joint, where the bones are surrounded by a fluid-filled space that helps the joint move smoothly
vc: Instagram/_jarvis.in_
Ludic Explorer🤸🏻🔍 retweeted
Who protects the rights of those entrusted with protecting everyone else's rights? Police personnel do not surrender their human rights when they put on a uniform. They retain their rights to life, dignity, physical safety and fair treatment. Their professional obligation to exercise restraint does not mean they must silently endure physical assault, humiliation or threats.
Does the right to protest give the cockroaches, politicians and their stooges the right to intimidate those on duty to maintain law and order? A functioning democracy must protect the freedom to assemble, dissent, question authority and challenge government decisions. These freedoms are particularly important when the government itself is the subject of criticism. But peaceful protest and violence are not interchangeable expressions of dissent.
Accountability can’t be a one way street!
We rightly demand that police personnel exercise restraint, even under provocation. With every assault case that we have seen in the recent protests, it’s important to know whether the affected officers were provided with proper investigation, medical and psychological support, legal protection. Where is the individual accountability for perpetrators?
How can we forget that the policewoman being assaulted while performing her duty is also a citizen. She has a family, a life outside her uniform, and the same fundamental human dignity as the people confronting her. Human rights cannot be conditional upon which side of a barricade someone stands on.
We speak frequently about the right to dissent. Perhaps we should speak equally seriously about the responsibility to dissent as well. Not because dissent should be polite or convenient to those in power. Effective dissent is often uncomfortable, disruptive and deeply challenging.
But because a democratic society depends on citizens recognising that exercising their own freedom does not erase the freedom and dignity of others.
The distinction between discomfort, disruption, harassment and violence must remain clear. The deeper issue, therefore, isn't whether we should support protesters or police personnel. It is whether we can build a culture in which we defend rights consistently, including when doing so is inconvenient to our own sympathies.
The one question we all must ask ourselves is: Have we become so invested in defending our rights that we are gradually forgetting how to respect the rights of others?
And this is not just in the context of protests, but in the larger conversation about what responsible citizenship means in a democracy.
Ludic Explorer🤸🏻🔍 retweeted
Around 3 years ago, Kavita Kumari lost her husband after a long illness in Ramgarh, Jharkhand. She had 2 young children and a family to take care of.
Life was not easy. She even worked as a security guard for some time to support her family.
But Kavita had one dream, she wanted a govt job so that her children could have a better and more secure future.
So, she started preparing for the Home Guard recruitment.
Every morning, at around 4 AM, Kavita would get up and go out for running practice. She did not have sports shoes or tracksuit. But she kept running.
Then came the physical test.
Kavita arrived at the ground wearing a saree. And because she could not afford running shoes, she ran barefoot.
She had to complete 1600 metres within 10 minutes.
And what happened next surprised everyone.
Under the hot sun, wearing a saree and running barefoot, Kavita completed the 1600 metres in just 6 minutes.
She was not running for a medal. She was not running for fame. She was running for her children.
Sometimes, we think we need the perfect shoes, the perfect clothes, the perfect circumstances, or the perfect opportunity to start.
Kavita had none of those things. She simply had a goal and a reason to keep going.
For her, that race was much bigger than a physical test. It was a race against poverty, difficult circumstances, and an uncertain future.
Six minutes. One mother. Two children. And a reason stronger than every obstacle.
Ludic Explorer🤸🏻🔍 retweeted
🌿🤍 Happy World Cotton Day!
Celebrating the humble cotton that connects farmers, nature, weavers & our everyday lives. 🌱🧵
Let’s value our farmers, support handloom and choose natural fibres. 🇮🇳
📌 Info credit: Internet
Ever noticed how a tiny wet patch on your shirt suddenly looks much darker?
Obviously the water has no color. So why does your shirt look darker the moment it gets wet?
The answer is hiding in something you can't see...
1/🧵
Then the fabric dries.
Water leaves those microscopic gaps.
Air returns
The fiber–air boundaries scatter light again.
More light reaches your eyes.
And the fabric gradually appears to return to its original brightness
6/


























