So sehr sich die Medien bemühen, die Proteste in Frankreich linksradikalen Chaoten in die Schuhe zu schieben - wir wissen es besser: Hier geht die Jugend gegen Sozialabbau, Kriegsvorbereitung und Genozid auf die Straße. Und ihre Wut springt über auf andere Länder. #Jugendrevolte

French “high schoolers” posing for a photo on the fiery but mostly peaceful streets of Paris. 🇫🇷

Thank you to everyone who stood with me over the years. It’s been a scary journey but I have always been grounded in my work and ability to provide exemplary service to my constituents. Trump and his administration have been after me since I arrived in Congress. I have always stood up to him and that will never change. The pedophile protector will never silence me.

I’m only going to ask one final question regarding the Cornell 7 case, and then I’m moving on. I genuinely believe this controversy has brought out some of the worst aspects of our society. I’m also amazed at how many people on the Right, who routinely criticize liberals for their intolerance of opposing viewpoints, have been so quick to attack, insult, unfollow, block and make entire videos attacking someone simply for disagreeing with them. Apparently, meaningful debate and freedom of thought are great principles until someone expresses an opinion you don’t like. Here’s the question I think everyone needs to answer. In roughly half the states, the Cornell men could potentially have faced criminal charges under laws that protect people who are too intoxicated to consent, even when they voluntarily took the drugs. The defense everyone keeps repeating is that she willingly took ketamine and allegedly didn’t object to the other men. But ketamine is known as a date rape drug precisely because it can impair someone’s awareness and judgment. They allegedly offered her ketamine and encouraged her to take it, knowing the drug could impair her judgment, lower her inhibitions and make her less likely to resist sexual advances. Then, once she was intoxicated, they invited a bunch of buddies into the room to have sex with her without her knowledge or prior consent. And this is where I think people are missing the bigger issue. Who has the right to offer another human being up for sex? She may have voluntarily taken ketamine. She may have voluntarily agreed to sex with certain men. But neither of those decisions should give those men the right to offer her up sexually to anyone else. And if they deliberately encouraged her to take ketamine, knowing it could make her less likely to refuse, then invited other men to take advantage of that impaired state, shouldn’t that raise an entirely separate question of criminal responsibility? In states with broader sexual assault laws, knowingly engaging in sexual activity with someone too intoxicated to consent can be criminal. And deliberately arranging for others to do so can potentially carry criminal liability as well. So I have two questions. First, should it be a crime to offer another human being up for sex without their knowledge or consent, regardless of whether they’re sober or intoxicated, and regardless of whether a rape ultimately occurs? Second, if you believe the conduct alleged in the Cornell case should be legal, do you also believe states where that conduct could result in criminal charges should weaken their laws?

A person willingly enters a tiger enclosure and approaches the tiger. The tiger begins mauling the person. You have a gun and the ability to take a clean shot at the tiger to save the person's life. What do you do?

If you think a Tigers life is more important than a human life, you have something deeply wrong with you. The tiger should have been shot on the spot while the man was still alive, they had plenty of time to do so and everyone knows it. It’s easy to make fun of the guy but if it were your family member you’d want the tiger killed to save them. Don’t @ me I don’t care.

Markets on “hold” today until FOMC rate decision at 2:15pm ET 1. if Fed raises, markets expected - Future cuts likely get removed, - 10-yr yield likely drops = stocks rally 2. If Fed “holds” - dovish surprise, even if hawkish talk - markets focus on hold regime underway = stocks rally We think most likely path is a rally post-2:15pm ET @FundstratDirect @FundstratCap @BitMNR $BMNR $BMNP

Niemiecka polityka wyjaśniona na szybko.

AI stocks will drop 10%+ on Monday morning Brace for impact folks @DarioAmodei just unwound the AI trade with a blog post

The first Cybercab accident is not what I expected

Alright this is just absurd

Calls for public inquiry into Jason Arday 'witchhunt' bbc.in/4xdxYED