Safe supply now, end poverty, climate justice, rent control, end homelessness and black and blueberry pie for all.

Vancouver, BC
Joined July 2017
Jean Swanson retweeted
🔥 🔥🔥
Trevor Ford thought Sean Orr would be the anchor that dragged Pete Fry down. Instead, Orr was the wind beneath his wings. 😁 #vanpoli #vanelxn2026
3
19
780
Jean Swanson retweeted
Trevor Ford thought Sean Orr would be the anchor that dragged Pete Fry down. Instead, Orr was the wind beneath his wings. 😁 #vanpoli #vanelxn2026
3
8
2
90
2,441
feels like a good day to do the damn thing - Vancouver, get out there to cast your vote and let's #EvictKenSim once and for all‼️‼️
2
18
335
I hope this helps people understand... Let's be clear: expecting bylaw officers to approach people on the street, ticket them, and confiscate their drugs is completely unrealistic. First, good luck finding bylaw officers willing to do that without police backup. People aren't just going to willingly hand over their drugs. Second, this isn't crime prevention. Confiscating someone's drugs doesn't end their addiction, it creates desperation, and desperation can lead to more crime as people try to replace what was taken. Lastly, and most importantly, this will push more people into hiding and using drugs alone, especially in communities where there are no supervised consumption sites. With today's toxic drug supply, forcing people further out of sight means more overdoses going unnoticed, more brain injuries, and more preventable deaths. You don't solve addiction by confiscating drugs, you just make an already dangerous situation even more dangerous!
48
48
215
4,338
Jean Swanson retweeted
Before you tell the public how many people you want to force into treatment, tell us how many people you're willing to help build a future for. How many homes will you provide? How many employment opportunities will you create? What long-term support will you guarantee?
I did an event in Kelowna on Saturday and there was a lot of talk about involuntary care so I wrote this last night Here's my question to every politician pushing involuntary treatment: If you genuinely want people to recover, why are you more focused on forcing them into treatment than addressing the conditions that make recovery so difficult in the first place? I'm not speaking from a textbook or a political talking point. I'm speaking from lived experience. I've lived through homelessness, poverty, trauma, mental health struggles, addiction and systems that were supposed to help but too often failed. I know firsthand that you cannot simply force someone to want a different life, and I know how difficult it is to move forward when you're struggling just to survive. You cannot force someone into stability. You have to create the conditions that make stability possible. Where are your guarantees of safe, affordable housing? Where are the meaningful employment opportunities? Where is the accessible counselling, mental health care and long-term support? Treatment doesn't erase poverty, It doesn't put a roof over someone's head, it doesn't magically create employment, heal trauma or give someone a sense of purpose. And sending someone back into the same circumstances that contributed to their struggles isn't a plan for lasting recovery, it's actually insanity. So here's my challenge to every politician advocating involuntary treatment: Before you tell the public how many people you want to force into treatment, tell us how many people you're willing to help build a future for. How many homes will you provide? How many employment opportunities will you create? What long-term support will you guarantee? And most importantly, have you actually listened to the people who have lived through what you're making policies about? Because the DATA doesn't support success from forcing people. They need dignity, they need choices, they need stability, they need hope, and they need a genuine opportunity to build a better life. Stop asking how to force people into recovery. Start asking what you're doing to make recovery possible. Are you trying to change people's lives, or just remove the visible evidence of the problems you've failed to address?
3
3
263
I did an event in Kelowna on Saturday and there was a lot of talk about involuntary care so I wrote this last night Here's my question to every politician pushing involuntary treatment: If you genuinely want people to recover, why are you more focused on forcing them into treatment than addressing the conditions that make recovery so difficult in the first place? I'm not speaking from a textbook or a political talking point. I'm speaking from lived experience. I've lived through homelessness, poverty, trauma, mental health struggles, addiction and systems that were supposed to help but too often failed. I know firsthand that you cannot simply force someone to want a different life, and I know how difficult it is to move forward when you're struggling just to survive. You cannot force someone into stability. You have to create the conditions that make stability possible. Where are your guarantees of safe, affordable housing? Where are the meaningful employment opportunities? Where is the accessible counselling, mental health care and long-term support? Treatment doesn't erase poverty, It doesn't put a roof over someone's head, it doesn't magically create employment, heal trauma or give someone a sense of purpose. And sending someone back into the same circumstances that contributed to their struggles isn't a plan for lasting recovery, it's actually insanity. So here's my challenge to every politician advocating involuntary treatment: Before you tell the public how many people you want to force into treatment, tell us how many people you're willing to help build a future for. How many homes will you provide? How many employment opportunities will you create? What long-term support will you guarantee? And most importantly, have you actually listened to the people who have lived through what you're making policies about? Because the DATA doesn't support success from forcing people. They need dignity, they need choices, they need stability, they need hope, and they need a genuine opportunity to build a better life. Stop asking how to force people into recovery. Start asking what you're doing to make recovery possible. Are you trying to change people's lives, or just remove the visible evidence of the problems you've failed to address?
36
135
17
360
10,842
Here's what politicians need to understand. We are already paying for homelessness through emergency rooms, ambulances, policing, shelters, hospitals and the justice system. Homelessness isn't free, it costs taxpayers a fortune. The question isn't whether we can afford to house people. It's whether we can afford to keep leaving them homeless. It's time for governments to stop managing homelessness and start ending it. Protect the housing we have, fund the programs that work, build the homes we need, and hold every elected official accountable for delivering real results. We can't afford another election full of promises while people remain on the streets. cheknews.ca/opinion-whoever-…
34
145
9
371
5,182
Jean Swanson retweeted
A message to all sane Republicans: He pardoned 1,600 violent criminals. You said nothing. He bulldozed the East Wing. You said nothing. He interfered with the release of the Epstein files. You said nothing. He took over the Kennedy Center and renamed it after himself. You said nothing. He accepted a $400 million airplane as a personal gift. You said nothing. He threatened Canada, Cuba, Denmark, Greenland, Venezuela, Colombia, and Brazil. You said nothing. He tariffed just about everyone but Russia, causing inflation and instability worldwide. You said nothing. He attacked a nation during mediated negotiations. You said nothing. His ill-conceived war killed 175 children on day one. You said nothing. He alienated and insulted our allies. You said nothing. His ICE Army terrorized and murdered U.S. citizens. You said nothing. He committed murder on the high seas. You said nothing. He co-opted the Justice Department and directed it to prosecute his political enemies. You said nothing. It's time to start talking!!! It's long overdue!!!!
1,748
8,222
372
25,527
776,132
Years ago, my lifelong Conservative father-in-law was holding his grandson when he said supervised consumption sites “just enable drug use.” I replied, “That's a dumb comment to make while holding your grandson. He might not be alive if one hadn't saved my life and connected me to recovery.” You should have seen his face when I said that. 😳 “Whoops. I didn't think that through.” So I arranged a tour. He met the nurses, saw the care, the detox upstairs, and the connections to recovery. He walked in believing these places enabled addiction, he walked out understanding they save lives. Today, he's one of their biggest supporters. Not because he abandoned his Conservative values, but because he realized compassion, dignity and keeping people alive were never at odds with them. He didn't just change his opinion. He became an advocate for the very people he'd once dismissed.
138
431
19
1,959
34,335
This shouldn't be hard for people to understand. More police doesn't reduce addiction. More police doesn't reduce mental illness. More police doesn't reduce homelessness. More police doesn't reduce poverty. More housing, more healthcare, more treatment, more outreach, more resources and more support does. That's how you build safer, healthier communities.
182
199
15
547
8,160
Jean Swanson retweeted
It’s a crazier election year than usual and it’s been interesting trying to figure out who to vote for, but one person I am going to vote for is Melanie Cheng, COPE candidate for School Board. She’s paid her dues, knows her stuff and is dedicated to public education. #VanPoli
3
3
27
647
Good morning from beautiful Victoria, BC. 🇨🇦 It doesn’t matter what community or province I speak in I keep seeing the same things: homelessness, addiction, and mental health struggles. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what’s missing. People need supportive housing AND resource centres where they can go during the day-places that offer safety, connection, services, and support. And guess what? That helps businesses too. When people have somewhere safe and welcoming to go, fewer people are left hanging out on sidewalks, in doorways, or in front of businesses because they have nowhere else to be. If we want fewer people on the streets, we need to give people somewhere to go. It's really that simple...
32
45
241
2,959
Jean Swanson retweeted
The Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs has joined a growing chorus of First Nations voices in denouncing the 'Pacific Link' pipeline-Grand Chief Stewart Phillip is promising a legal fight and possible 'boots on the ground.'
First Nations along the 'Pacific Link' pipeline route are speaking out about the lack of consultation by the Carney government over the project now designated in the national interest. One is pondering legal action. aptnnews.ca?p=295352
28
83
6
152
5,056
How about we open 100 beds at Saint Paul's for people with bad ideas. I mean some ideas im hearing in these elections are delusional if they were properly assessed. Lol
12
13
54
1,477
Whoa! Go Lisa go!
Wow! Great get for the @BCGreens to put up against the BC NDP’s Richard Zussman 👀
3
567
Jean Swanson retweeted
8/ Instead, these decisions put the oil industry’s expansion agenda ahead of endangered whales, a safe climate and protection of our coast. We could be building the future. Instead, our government is spending billions locking us into the past. Disgusted. Heartbroken. 💔
1
4
16
467
Jean Swanson retweeted
1/ So it’s official. Faced with a choice between whales and oil, our Prime Minister chose oil. Faced with a choice between a safe climate and more fossil fuel expansion, he chose oil again. Today, Mark Carney announced yet another mammoth oilsands pipeline. #cdnpoli #bcpoli 🧵
16
57
5
125
6,660
Jean Swanson retweeted
NAOMI KLIEIN to SAM ALTMAN: "...you ingested the entire written output of human civilization without consent, without compensation and without credit to build a system whose primary commercial application is eliminating the jobs of the people whose work you consumed. You are not 'liberating human creativity' -- you are strip-mining it and selling it back at a markup while calling the theft 'training data'."
129
6,742
246
26,510
756,601
Kyla has a terrific article on this.
B.C. Court Strikes Down Canada’s “Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking” Offence in the DULF Case kylaleelawyer.substack.com/p…
4
4
10
839