Jay Gekek retweeted
WOAH 🚨 American posted a video of her daughter sitting in the car. META then put a prompt on the video saying “Who’s the child passenger” for people to click on, then gave personal info AND HOME LOCATION
“Why in the hell is that even a suggested question about a minor? But I clicked it, and this is where I started getting really uncomfortable:
It starts pulling completely separate information for each of my kids, their names, birth information, pictures and videos of them.
It pulled a newborn picture from my mom's page from years ago, and then it pulled this. I deleted this picture years ago”
Here’s where it gets extremely shocking
“And then Facebook suggests that I ask Meta AI, "Where does Kaylie Robbins live?" Are you kidding me? — then it says, "I'm pointing Kaylie Robbins' location." It pieced together my information to show people where I live”
It looks like this is META’s AI that is doing this. When it gives these messages on people’s videos and photos to “learn more” about something, it’s to help people get more information about topics or posts that interest them
But unfortunately, it’s what’s in the photo so if it’s a child that’s what the AI is looking for more information on. Apparently META is fixing this issue….
Here’s how to make sure this doesn’t happen to you on META
- Lock down audience on old albums, not just new posts, make private if possible
- Public + “friends of friends” is what these systems treat as available to use for AI
- Ask relatives to untag and unshare kids. You have to do this because copies on their pages stay in the available information for the Ai to pull from
- Turn off camera roll, cloud processing, sharing suggestions in Facebook settings and restrict the Facebook app’s photo access on the phone to selected photos only (You have to do this because Facebook is testing AI features that pull from your phone camera roll)
Meta says they’re patching this specific prompt style, but that doesn’t mean the underlying ability to answer “who is this child and where does this person live” from public history is gone
When you delete something it isn’t really done and can still be used by META’s artificial intelligence
A photo you deleted from your timeline can still exist on someone else’s album, share or download, it can also be in Meta’s backup window after deletion
Relatives tagging or posting kids is a separate data source you don’t control. This can be accessed by the AI to pull data on your child. The woman explicitly said that’s how some of the old newborn and family information was sourced and provided to anyone who clicked the link
One of the craziest parts about this that people NEED to be aware of is this part
‘Meta has also been testing camera-roll and cloud-processing suggestions that analyze unpublished photos if you opt in’
This means photos and videos on your cloud or camera roll that haven’t been posted... META can treat these items as a data source, even though you never posted the photo or video…. Insanity
His words are still heard, and should continue to be heard on repeat. Https://youtu.be/b8Sbtc-3opA…
I know it's not entirely your fault that your mommy let them take your foreskin. Though now you are a man and it's time to stand up and demand our children be left alone.
Jay Gekek retweeted
People act like asking questions about Dolly Parton is a crime. It’s not. Watch the Access Hollywood Dumplin’ clip. Sandra Bullock crashes with tequila. Dolly raises a glass. A whole lot of folks hear her toast “to the god Azazel.” Azazel isn’t a cute country nickname. That’s the wilderness figure from Leviticus and the bound Watcher in Enoch who taught weapons, vanity, and corruption. You don’t toast that name by accident.
Then the 2026 thank you video to Taylor and Travis. She jokes about taking their firstborn “that’s gonna be one special baby” and throws up the horns while she says it. Firstborn + that sign is not “just Dolly being Dolly” to everybody paying attention.
She can sing about Jesus on a Christmas special and still give people every reason to side eye the symbols. I don’t buy the “it’s only a rock and roll hand” story when it lands on a firstborn line and sits next to that old toast clip.
Yeah kind of happy there. But it was the other stuff I was more concerned with.
People say nothing has been done by this administration. Well, there's been some good, there's been some crap. But on immigration, historic good. Honestly, there isn't even a distant second.
You can argue it isn't enough. Fine. But it's more than any president has ever done. Did you vote for perfect? Or did you vote for more than ever?
Oh I think you could be definitely on to something. That is a logical function. Any intel they could get, ormake maybe somebody's job easier. God please protect Candace. This evil exists, and it uses anyone to do the dirty work.
WHAT IF THE $300K WAS NEVER ABOUT THE DEBATE?
Here’s a different angle worth asking.
Andrew Wilson reportedly put up $300,000 to debate Candace Owens, and Patrick Bet-David moderated the August 14 showdown.
But watching it, Andrew looked strangely underprepared for somebody willing to put that kind of money on the table.
So what exactly was $300,000 buying?
Because the debate took place inside Candace’s personal studio.
Now I want to be clear. I have seen ZERO evidence Andrew, Patrick, or anyone on their teams planted surveillance equipment, compromised her network, or collected data from devices inside the house.
But from a security perspective, access matters.
If multiple outside production teams, electronics, cameras, microphones, laptops, phones and networking equipment enter a private residence, you better know exactly what came in and exactly what left.
That isn't accusing somebody of espionage. It's asking why anyone in Candace’s position wouldn't treat the entire event like a security problem.
Especially when the people involved have spent months maneuvering through public accusations, negotiations and media narratives.
Maybe Andrew simply paid $300K for a debate he barely prepared for.
Or perhaps the bigger lesson has nothing to do with Andrew at all.
Never confuse somebody being invited into your house with somebody earning your trust.
My name is Mr. Wayne. RedLines Out.
#CandaceOwens #Media #Politics
Jay Gekek retweeted
Hey @Grok, which religious group dominates the Upper West Side?
Odd, there’s not a SINGLE Flock camera on the Upper West Side… 🤔
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
NYC has zero Flock Safety cameras citywide. NYPD, DOT and MTA confirmed no contracts. DeFlock is a crowdsourced map of all ALPRs and incomplete; other ALPRs exist on the UWS at multiple spots including W 72nd & CPW.
westsiderag.com/2026/08/13/an-…
maps.deflock.org
nytrafficticket.com/resources/nyc-…
Jay Gekek retweeted
xitter.cf/OwenShroyerHQ/status/2…
He is a terrible debater, I watched this when it was happening and I was even writing stuff down that was questionable. In this only a few months ago you can get a sense of who Andrew is. He defends Epstein at one point. I don’t know if your team has seen this to get a total sense of who he is
Jay Gekek retweeted
Imagine being Barack Obama, thinking you got away with murder since 2016, spying, lying, rigging the game, watching Trump get dragged through hell, and thinking it's over.
You install your puppet and breathe easy like you're untouchable. But then Trump comes storming back after 34 sham convictions, two arrests, and two assassination attempts and wins in 2024.
Now, suddenly, you're not safe. You're staring down treason charges, your entire legacy collapsing, your lies exposed, and the world finally seeing you for what you are: a smooth-talking thug.
Karma didn't forget you, it just waited. And the reckoning you thought would never come is now here, and it's glorious to watch!
Sounds about right – at Bismarck, ND
Anyone who knows anything about security understands that when your critically wounded client is bleeding out in the back of an SUV, Priority #1 is keeping the Mossad agent and the 40-year-old sk8r boi who wears a beanie everywhere fully updated.
Jay Gekek retweeted
If you want to prove to someone that Charlie's shirt moves BEFORE the damage to his neck, show them this. It is unbelievable that anyone believes it was a bullet. At this point, I think some people just say they believe the FEDSLOP because their hatred of Candace Owens outweighs their love of the truth.