Data/Compliance lawyer in Mainland China. CEO of Pathway Compliance, an ALSP based in Shanghai. Views my own and not legal advice.

Shanghai
Joined April 2011
I graduated law school and moved to China to work for a Chinese law firm at around the same time as Katie Zacharia did the same. Here are some of my experiences…
Q: You said Zacharia is an attorney. Where did she pass the bar exam? What state? ZACHARIA: When I moved to China
69
183
29
1,219
899,886
So if she was never admitted, and under those circumstances still held herself out as a lawyer/attorney, to the point that the President introduced her as such, it is a huge red flag, both for the legal profession and the American people.
10
21
1
432
63,415
Some additional information since this is attracting a lot of eyes: I graduated and moved to China in 2012, a year later than her, the same year I passed the bar (NY) I was involved in similar cases/situations but I did not know her, although I worked a lot with her firm.
13
9
299
46,494
However, the people in those roles (without a license) are repeatedly made acutely aware of the limited scope of their role and are repeatedly informed about the rules calling themselves lawyers/attorneys.
2
8
228
68,740
She would undoubtedly have been informed of the rules about unauthorized practice of law in law school and also at the law firm she worked at, especially at a large Chinese firm that would be very sensitive about that designation.
4
6
171
65,787
Then she started working for a Chinese firm and never sat for the bar because it wasn’t needed for her particular (reduced) role in that practice group, and also didn’t match her family situation.
2
8
189
76,324
All of that is fine. Chinese law firms hire foreign talent to work in those roles all of the time, there is a lot of work happening in a law firm that doesn’t require a license, whether it is a local license in China or abroad, and they add a lot of value in other areas.
2
8
180
72,590
The firm she worked at, Zhong Lun, is a prestigious Chinese firm that would have a solid internal control system to track licensing / bar results.
1
13
283
92,950
Someone who is hired at that type of firm would likely be hired on a condition that they show they passed the bar / were admitted to practice law within a certain time frame, otherwise they would be fired. She was there two to three years, very unusual if she was never admitted.
3
8
226
87,839
The firm’s rules echoed the ethics rules that had been drilled into us in law school about the unauthorized practice of law and advertising us as “lawyers” or “attorneys”. Everyone was acutely aware of the threshold, needing to both pass the bar and be admitted.
1
10
1
228
107,760
Her statements of “practicing law”, being a “lawyer”, or acting as “general counsel” would very likely be an unauthorized practice of law violation if she was not admitted to the bar somewhere (especially the specific jurisdiction she was in).
4
19
357
100,779
The Chippy Dippy Dopey Duck songs have invaded my kids playlists like the Baby Shark songs did when they were much younger. AI sign of the times.
1
2
2,247
Why do legal AI systems fail when cases unfold over months, not moments? Researchers from Fudan University, Shanghai Innovation Institute, and Northwest University of Political and Law present LegalWorld – a life-cycle legal environment that models Chinese civil litigation as a causally connected chain of five stages, not isolated tasks. Built on 75,309 real judgments with persistent memory and skills, it outperforms prior simulators by preserving cross-stage dependencies. Tests across consultation, drafting, and courtroom advocacy reveal sharp capability gaps – no single model leads across all stages, proving that today's aggregated scores hide critical weaknesses. LegalWorld: ALife-Cycle Interactive Environment for Legal Agents Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2606.18728 Project: github.com/sii-research/Lega… Our report: mp.weixin.qq.com/s/E3e8Sp0BT… 📬 #PapersAccepted by Jiqizhixin
1
11
1,264
When it looks like AI will kill your legal practice, only to find…
1
1
48
38,234
Jared T Nelson retweeted
I’m an AI PhD at Oxford wanted to move to the US for years, but it never worked out. Maybe I can share why. To me, it feels like the US is making it harder and harder for Chinese talent to come or stay. First, Trump signed PP10043, which meant I couldn’t go to the US for any graduate school. That’s why I had to turn down my Stanford offer and come to Oxford. Later, I qualified for an EB-1A (the extraordinary ability green card). But because I was born in China, I’m stuck in a country-specific backlog that could take another 4–5 years. Meanwhile, on the other side, I’m getting 3–4 emails from China almost every week. They offer high salaries, free housing, generous research funding, and even offered an astonishing amount of money just for me to come back and have a conversation. I’ve always loved the American spirit. I truly believe my abilities could have a bigger impact there. But honestly, the whole process has been incredibly frustrating. All of this makes me wonder whether I should just give up. Why am I spending so much energy trying to go to a country that doesn’t seem to want me, when another country is doing everything it can to bring me back?
kimi’s founder & ceo got his phd at cmu. why didn’t he stay in america?!
892
937
228
10,870
2,366,305
Jared T Nelson retweeted
One of the reasons technologists tend to dislike the law is that it imposes an opaque, mandatory arcana onto their world that technology nearly always gets to impose on others
2
6
48
3,309