I make Clips from Dr Jame's white's program, the dividing line, my YouTube is https://xitter.cf/t.co/JOlYqQrRnM, where i post most of me clips.

Joined November 2025
Dividing Line Clips retweeted
I see @JayDyer blocked me for pointing out his grasping at straws.
Replying to @JayDyer
We never have comments except during live shows. You're reaching here because Craig failed to actually defend the thesis.
2
1
24
513
Wow... just wow
Ni una sola bandera de Francia en las "protestas" "estudiantiles". Solo banderas de entidades islámicas.
1
24
Dividing Line Clips retweeted
Ni una sola bandera de Francia en las "protestas" "estudiantiles". Solo banderas de entidades islámicas.
3,124
29,202
1,875
135,564
2,888,838
No Craig failed to prove the thesis. So he did not win that debate in the slightest.
Yesterday evening I watched the debate between James White and Craig Truglia. I am much more on board with White’s stance, but Truglia completely annihilated him in this debate, something I find astonishing given the disparity in debating experience. Truglia outmanoeuvred him…
1
19
426
And this is why we need the death penalty. “ “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed, for God made man in his own image.” Genesis 9:6
Since Lindsay Clancy's trial 82 mothers have killed 123 of their children.
5
110
“But even if we (or an angel from heaven) should preach a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be condemned to hell! ” Galatians 1:8 The EO church is condemned by Paul because of that council.
The final words of the 7th Session of Nicea II, 787: The holy council exclaimed: ‘We all believe accordingly, we all hold the same, we have all signed in accord. This is the faith of the apostles, this is the faith of the fathers, this is the faith of the orthodox, this is the faith that has sustained the world. Believing in one God, to be praised in trinity, we kiss the honourable images. May those who do not hold accordingly be anathema! May those who do not believe accordingly be driven far away from the church! We follow the ancient legislation of the catholic church, we observe the decrees of the fathers. We anathematize those who either add anything or remove anything from the church. We anathematize the intrusive innovation of the accusers of Christians. We accept the sacred images. We subject those who do not believe accordingly to anathema. To those who apply to the sacred images the sayings in divine scripture against idols anathema! To those who do not kiss the holy and venerable images anathema! To those who call the sacred images idols anathema! To those who say that Christians had recourse to the images as gods anathema! To those who knowingly communicate with those who insult and dishonour the sacred images anathema! To those who say it was someone other than Christ our God who rescued us from idols anathema! To those who dare to say that the catholic church ever accepted idols anathema! ‘Many years to the emperors! To Constantine and his mother Eirene many years! To the victorious emperors many years! To the new Constantine and the new Helena eternal memory! May God protect their authority! Heavenly king, protect the kings on earth! ‘To all the heretics anathema! To the assembly that insulted the sacred images anathema! To whoever accept the impious mouthings of their heresy anathema!....They scorned the images of the Lord and his saints, and the Lord has scorned them. If anyone defends anyone who belongs to this heresy that accuses Christians or who has ended his life in it, anathema!...If anyone does not accept the gospel narratives when painted, anathema! If anyone does not kiss them as being in the name of the Lord and his saints, anathema! If anyone rejects any ecclesiastical tradition written or unwritten, anathema! I had to provide these words today. My opponent, who believes them, did not. Today's debate was about the gospel, and Craig admitted it. Everyone in that audience, and any audience in the future who watches it, must have the maturity to recognize what is at stake. Nicea II added icon veneration (προσκύνησις) to the gospel. The Apostles never taught such a thing, and all the references to symbols, chalices, signet rings, and grave markings, from earlier centuries, does not add it to the gospel either. So when you boil it all down, Mr. Truglia defended the anathematization of entire swaths of professing Christians not over the doctrine of God, or a denial of the resurrection, or a perversion of the gospel, but, because we do not do what Irene, Empress of the Byzantine Empire, demanded we do 1200+ years ago.
9
152
Dividing Line Clips retweeted
During a debate reaction stream a loudmouthed heckler blurts out something that didn't happen and the internet runs with it. 🤔
1
2
12
408
Dividing Line Clips retweeted
Dr. James White and Craig Truglia debate the Orthodox practice of Icon Veneration. Since the livestream didn't produce a playback version I rushed home to upload this rough draft version. Next week I will sit down and clean up some of the shots, (there were a couple where the speaker stepped out of view), drop in some titles and upload that as the permanent video. In the meantime this should replace the playback nicely. - Rich youtu.be/tK5qq87UthQ
17
10
4
114
8,980
Dividing Line Clips retweeted
America is this want you want here? I do not care if you hate Trump or republicans, if you do not vote republican this election this will be here before the next election
Communislam is coming for you. My Democrat friends, you must NEVER ally with these people. They are not on your “side”. They are animals and they want to destroy everything you love. They will whisper sweet liberal nothings in your ear then jam an ice pick in it.
1
2
119
The final words of the 7th Session of Nicea II, 787: The holy council exclaimed: ‘We all believe accordingly, we all hold the same, we have all signed in accord. This is the faith of the apostles, this is the faith of the fathers, this is the faith of the orthodox, this is the faith that has sustained the world. Believing in one God, to be praised in trinity, we kiss the honourable images. May those who do not hold accordingly be anathema! May those who do not believe accordingly be driven far away from the church! We follow the ancient legislation of the catholic church, we observe the decrees of the fathers. We anathematize those who either add anything or remove anything from the church. We anathematize the intrusive innovation of the accusers of Christians. We accept the sacred images. We subject those who do not believe accordingly to anathema. To those who apply to the sacred images the sayings in divine scripture against idols anathema! To those who do not kiss the holy and venerable images anathema! To those who call the sacred images idols anathema! To those who say that Christians had recourse to the images as gods anathema! To those who knowingly communicate with those who insult and dishonour the sacred images anathema! To those who say it was someone other than Christ our God who rescued us from idols anathema! To those who dare to say that the catholic church ever accepted idols anathema! ‘Many years to the emperors! To Constantine and his mother Eirene many years! To the victorious emperors many years! To the new Constantine and the new Helena eternal memory! May God protect their authority! Heavenly king, protect the kings on earth! ‘To all the heretics anathema! To the assembly that insulted the sacred images anathema! To whoever accept the impious mouthings of their heresy anathema!....They scorned the images of the Lord and his saints, and the Lord has scorned them. If anyone defends anyone who belongs to this heresy that accuses Christians or who has ended his life in it, anathema!...If anyone does not accept the gospel narratives when painted, anathema! If anyone does not kiss them as being in the name of the Lord and his saints, anathema! If anyone rejects any ecclesiastical tradition written or unwritten, anathema! I had to provide these words today. My opponent, who believes them, did not. Today's debate was about the gospel, and Craig admitted it. Everyone in that audience, and any audience in the future who watches it, must have the maturity to recognize what is at stake. Nicea II added icon veneration (προσκύνησις) to the gospel. The Apostles never taught such a thing, and all the references to symbols, chalices, signet rings, and grave markings, from earlier centuries, does not add it to the gospel either. So when you boil it all down, Mr. Truglia defended the anathematization of entire swaths of professing Christians not over the doctrine of God, or a denial of the resurrection, or a perversion of the gospel, but, because we do not do what Irene, Empress of the Byzantine Empire, demanded we do 1200+ years ago.
58
44
14
334
23,305
Appreciate everyone who came out today to an early morning debate. Was really surprised that folks flew in from far away! Amazing. Lots of great conversations afterward as well. So the Orthobros are very actively demonstrating that their mutual maturity age is about 9 right now on line, dancing around and claiming victory---just as expected. I mean, these guys think Jay Dyer wins every moment he opens his mouth to order a pizza, so what do you expect? It never crossed my mind to even worry about them. I noticed as I looked briefly at a string of their "bloodbath" comments that the average followers number was less than 100. Serious folks! But I am keeping my eyes on two topics from the debate that, if there is a serious bone in any of their bodies, will eventually come up---HAS to come up, because Craig fumbled those topics badly. So far...not a whisper. So, I am hoping some more good comments will be posted so that when I take the time to go over the non-engagement with key elements of my presentation we will have a few illustrations to add. Oh, I do have to note this one just in passing. Saw someone, seriously, suggesting that the reason Peter knew who Moses and Elijah were on the Mount of Transfiguration was because...the Jews had icons of them! Think that one through for a second. I really think the person was being serious. Honestly! But I would like to respond to one clip going around that is very illustrative of the mindset of the Orthobros. During cross-ex Craig repeatedly interrupted me, mid-sentence. At one point I was explaining the difference between the concept of veneration (προσκύνησις) as defined at Nicea II and the use of a picture of a lost child at a funeral. Craig interrupted me mid sentence and this time I did not stop speaking. I was talking about how the parents knew the child, but the veneration of icons did not have that element of personal knowledge in it. As old as I am, I never met Basil or Gregory or Chrysostom (the men in the icon I held up at the end of the debate). So I do not have personal knowledge of them. While I was still talking Craig asked about personal knowledge of Christ. I did not hear him because I was still talking. And now the entire net (including Jay Dyer) are saying I have denied knowing Christ personally. The absurdity of it is stunning, but, these are the Orthobros we are talking about here. Absurdity is the oxygen of their six hour long mutual admiration society webcasts. But what is really funny to think about is this: given their own standards, does this mean that every Orthobro who has venerated an icon of Christ is qualified to be an apostle? I mean, since they have "seen the Lord" and hence "know" him in some special way, that means they can be an apostle, right? Uh huh. Got it.
140
27
12
365
39,642
Dividing Line Clips retweeted
He was talking about whether one should kiss a photo of a child they lost versus an icon of someone who they didn't know personally. James answered the original question as asked, which was not about knowledge of Christ.
3
13
656
Its out everyone! go go go!
⚔️ FULL DEBATE NOW AVAILABLE Topic: Icon Veneration as Defined by the Second Nicene Council (787) is Apostolic. 🎙️ Craig Truglia vs. Dr. James White 🔗 Watch the replay here: youtu.be/tK5qq87UthQ?si=q5oR… #Apologetics #JamesWhite #Debate #ChurchHistory #Orthodoxy #ReformedTheology #SecondNicene
1
16
641
Dividing Line Clips retweeted
⚔️ FULL DEBATE NOW AVAILABLE Topic: Icon Veneration as Defined by the Second Nicene Council (787) is Apostolic. 🎙️ Craig Truglia vs. Dr. James White 🔗 Watch the replay here: youtu.be/tK5qq87UthQ?si=q5oR… #Apologetics #JamesWhite #Debate #ChurchHistory #Orthodoxy #ReformedTheology #SecondNicene
13
10
1
81
3,124
This was really good. Truglia didnt beat around the bush with the Anathema's.
3
5
297
Dividing Line Clips retweeted
Replying to @Michael__Garten
Craig was woefully unprepared to defend the actual debate thesis. He never showed that anyone was deemed anathema by Apostles. THAT was the definition of iconodulia at Nicea II.
4
1
2
23
2,457
The debate isn't even uploaded yet and we have memes already 😭😭
James White’s closing in the debate against Craig Truglia today.
3
6
471
i think the debate went well. the cross ex was kinda wacky. other then that it was pretty good. James did well, it was quite close but he stayed on the topic more then Trulia did.
I’m watching right now. What did everyone think?
2
9
502