It’s very clear to me that people are failing to connect what is happening in France with the wider conflict involving Israel, Iran and the movements organizing around Palestine. When Palestinian advocacy groups bring their messaging, flags and political demands into school protests, people need to examine what those organizations are trying to accomplish. Those organizations are bringing a separate political agenda into a domestic dispute. They will continue to do so and a big part of why this is prior administrations have continuously allow the IRGC to do whatever they wanted. The people who are outrageous the protesting are also some of the people, not all, but some that are outraged at the war in Iran. Who do you think funds a lot of these protests? Do you think that all of these Palestinian causes are funded by who? Obviously they’re funded by terrorist money and they are funded by Iran. Wanting peace does not answer the question of what happens when the Islamic Republic is left free to finance, arm and support groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis. And that’s before we even talk about the nuclear weapons. Weakness and lack of deterrence which is what a lot of these restrainer people who are really upset with Donald Trump, and willing to throw away the midterms over, never seem to understand. They only understand the immigration, but it goes deeper than that. To me, deterrence is central to this entire discussion. Immigration policy is part of the picture, but so are money, ideological influence and the willingness to impose consequences on regimes that sponsor terrorism. There is an inversion of morality when America’s exercise of power is automatically treated as aggression while the regimes financing violence are excused, minimized or allowed to continue. Of course, untracked immigration is a huge problem, but so is unchecked Islamic aggression, fueled by money and appeasement.