
@GopherBaseball Dir. of Analytics and Pitching Development
Joined December 2019
- Tweets1.5K
- Following991
- Followers533
- Likes37.4K
Pinned Tweet
Here are the Breakeven %s of stealing 2B for each ball-strike count:
2019 draft example:
Andrew Vaughn (1.3) 10th percentile college BsR
Bryson Stott (1.14) 87th percentile college BsR
Pro batting: 37 vs 33 runs, Pro baserunning: -39 vs 35
74 run swing across 6 pro seasons
For just MLB baserunning (both ~3,000PA) -29 vs 26 BsR, ~5-6 wins
1
1
159
While most of this production is in the form of minor leauge value, I've found elite runners reach MLB at the same rate as matched peers, and college BsR still predicts MLB BsR (r .44), so it's tracking towards MLB value
So if the bats are similar, take the better baserunner
1
1
77
Baserunning is at the center of this World Series I looked into how orgs accuire it
I found that elite college baserunners seem to be undervalued in the draft, 84% of the top quintile are above average runners in pro ball
No single org seems better at developing or drafting it
Teams don’t value baserunning in the draft. A standard deviation better of a college bat moves him about 35% earlier; the same jump in college BsR moves him about 0% (±4%), statistically zero. No org’s number is distinguishable from the league’s
1
49
No org develops baserunning better than any other. In the agreggate and after accounting for the BsR produced in college,all 30 orgs land within 0.1 runs/600 PA of 0
Chart is college picks from 2019-26. If split by class the order only changes, shwoing no real development edge
1
3
120
How sticky is BsR? College BsR actualy predicts pro BsR just as well as one MLB season predicts the next (r=.47 vs .45). Stickiness increases as level increases as shown below, college predicts MLB at .44
This means a +10 BsR/600PA college player projects to be worth ~3 BsR/600
1
4
181
How much faster does a fastball play based on location in the zone?
Took the ideal contact point (from hard-contact swings) vs. where contact happened, then converted that miss in feet to the velo change that would've made the swing on time
All relative to middle middle
Jack Schad retweeted
We are deeply saddened to announce the passing of Hall of Fame coach John Anderson.
Our thoughts are with his wife Jan, their daughter Erin, and the thousands he impacted during his 43 years as head coach of the Gophers.
🔗: z.umn.edu/bfxf
Jack Schad retweeted
Cole Selvig was a great selection by the Marlins (round 6, pick 172), betting on raw feel for spin and their ability to manipulate his pitch shapes.
The numbers at Minnesota don't stand out: 67.1 IP // 19.9% K // 7.9% BB // 5.21 ERA // 5.06 FIP.
Neither do the whiff rates on each of his pitches:
FF (16%), SL (28%), FC (31%), CH (32%). But each individual pitch shape tells a different story.
Averaging 93.3 mph, Selvig's four-seam sits at 19 iVB and 7 horz from a slightly low, flat release (5.7 ft. -4.46 VAA, 5.8 ext.). If Miami can get him 94-95, the pitch plays close to ML plus for strikes and whiffs at the top of the zone, even with some shape degradation from the MLB ball. But it's dependent on him revamping his secondaries and increasing the velocity band of his arsenal.
A clear sign of his feel for spin and supination bias, Selvig holds velocity well on his glove-side secondaries. His cutter was consistently right at 90 mph with 8 vert and -1 horz, a strong bridge pitch to sit between his sweeping slider.
On the year, his slider averaged 85.8 mph (4/-12, 2626 RPM), but the shape varied significantly. When I saw him in April @ UCLA, it took the "hand of god" shape around (8/-8), despite starting the season in truer sweeper territory. Selvig threw plenty 83-85 mph near the 0-line with 16+ in. of sweep, but he also threw a bunch that backed up and blended with the cutter.
While the firm, lifty shape grades well in stuff models, it doesn't fit his arsenal all that well, and is the reason for the below-expected whiff rates. Selvig throws three pitches within a 7.5 mph, 19-inch horizontal and 14-inch vertical box. An incredibly high 46% foul ball rate on swings against his FF tells the whole story: hitters didn't have to sit on a particular pitch because they all slightly resembled each other, and they could still make contact with what should be a good fastball with ease.
Each pitch is strong in its own right, but they cluster too tightly together. Not only should Selvig throw his sweeper slower for more horizontal movement, but he would also benefit from an even slower curveball — to expand hitters' sights vertically while broadening the velocity band.
Selvig would also benefit from a sinker for right-handed hitters, expanding his arsenal further armside horizontally, alleviating his four-seam in some early counts, and increasing the distinction of his sweeper.
I have yet to mention his kick changeup, a decently effective pitch to LHH at 87.6 (3/12, 1295 RMP). Strong iVB separation from the fastball will have to make up for the lack of velocity separation (-5.7 mph).
Selvig had a clear plus feel for spin when I saw him in person, but he limited his arsenal by throwing a firmer, more vertical slider. It's hard to live with just a 7.5 mph gap between your hardest and slowest pitch, and he has room to expand his arsenal in both directions horizontally. A consistent 83-84 mph sweeper at (0, 17), which flashed at times last season, would do him wonders.
Jack Schad retweeted
Great day to be a Gopher! 4 pitchers selected in this year’s MLB Draft - including our entire starting weekend rotation, LHP out of the pen, and - 1 incoming Fr arm in the 2026 class!
3 more positional players and 1 incoming transfer make up the 9 total selected today!
Couldn’t be more happy and proud for these guys - looking forward to watching them crush it in the professional ranks!
Come develop into a professional HERE! 〽️
Eight Gophers Picked on Day Two of 2026 MLB Draft z.umn.edu/bf3c



















