Jack Schad (@JackSchad) header
Jack Schad (@JackSchad) profile picture

@GopherBaseball Dir. of Analytics and Pitching Development

Joined December 2019
Here are the Breakeven %s of stealing 2B for each ball-strike count:
If you attempt a SB on the first pitch, and the count goes to 1-0, you either gain +.30 on the SB or lose .60 on the CS. That sets the breakeven point at 66.7%. If the count goes to 0-1, you gain +.20 on the SB and lose .66 on the CS. That sets the breakeven point at 76.7% 1/3
3
15
1
186
68,824
2019 draft example: Andrew Vaughn (1.3) 10th percentile college BsR Bryson Stott (1.14) 87th percentile college BsR Pro batting: 37 vs 33 runs, Pro baserunning: -39 vs 35 74 run swing across 6 pro seasons For just MLB baserunning (both ~3,000PA) -29 vs 26 BsR, ~5-6 wins
1
1
159
While most of this production is in the form of minor leauge value, I've found elite runners reach MLB at the same rate as matched peers, and college BsR still predicts MLB BsR (r .44), so it's tracking towards MLB value So if the bats are similar, take the better baserunner
1
1
77
Method: Scraped D1/D2 play by play data from schools sites and MLB StatsAPI play by play BsR=steals (wSB) +extra bases taken and outs on the bases (UBR) +double plays avoided (wGDP), each in runs vs the average runner in the same base-out state Pro BsR matches Statcast at r=.80
75
Baserunning is at the center of this World Series I looked into how orgs accuire it I found that elite college baserunners seem to be undervalued in the draft, 84% of the top quintile are above average runners in pro ball No single org seems better at developing or drafting it
1
2
19
1,724
Based on this research it seems baserunning is free value in the draft Holding pick and college hitting stats constant, a top-10% college baserunners produced +4.8 more pro runs per 600 PA than matched peers, about half a WAR per season
1
69
Teams don’t value baserunning in the draft. A standard deviation better of a college bat moves him about 35% earlier; the same jump in college BsR moves him about 0% (±4%), statistically zero. No org’s number is distinguishable from the league’s
1
49
No org develops baserunning better than any other. In the agreggate and after accounting for the BsR produced in college,all 30 orgs land within 0.1 runs/600 PA of 0 Chart is college picks from 2019-26. If split by class the order only changes, shwoing no real development edge
1
3
120
How sticky is BsR? College BsR actualy predicts pro BsR just as well as one MLB season predicts the next (r=.47 vs .45). Stickiness increases as level increases as shown below, college predicts MLB at .44 This means a +10 BsR/600PA college player projects to be worth ~3 BsR/600
1
4
181
How much faster does a fastball play based on location in the zone? Took the ideal contact point (from hard-contact swings) vs. where contact happened, then converted that miss in feet to the velo change that would've made the swing on time All relative to middle middle
6
5
1
97
15,195
We are deeply saddened to announce the passing of Hall of Fame coach John Anderson. Our thoughts are with his wife Jan, their daughter Erin, and the thousands he impacted during his 43 years as head coach of the Gophers. 🔗: z.umn.edu/bfxf
56
235
125
1,595
1,036,316
Cole Selvig was a great selection by the Marlins (round 6, pick 172), betting on raw feel for spin and their ability to manipulate his pitch shapes. The numbers at Minnesota don't stand out: 67.1 IP // 19.9% K // 7.9% BB // 5.21 ERA // 5.06 FIP. Neither do the whiff rates on each of his pitches: FF (16%), SL (28%), FC (31%), CH (32%). But each individual pitch shape tells a different story. Averaging 93.3 mph, Selvig's four-seam sits at 19 iVB and 7 horz from a slightly low, flat release (5.7 ft. -4.46 VAA, 5.8 ext.). If Miami can get him 94-95, the pitch plays close to ML plus for strikes and whiffs at the top of the zone, even with some shape degradation from the MLB ball. But it's dependent on him revamping his secondaries and increasing the velocity band of his arsenal. A clear sign of his feel for spin and supination bias, Selvig holds velocity well on his glove-side secondaries. His cutter was consistently right at 90 mph with 8 vert and -1 horz, a strong bridge pitch to sit between his sweeping slider. On the year, his slider averaged 85.8 mph (4/-12, 2626 RPM), but the shape varied significantly. When I saw him in April @ UCLA, it took the "hand of god" shape around (8/-8), despite starting the season in truer sweeper territory. Selvig threw plenty 83-85 mph near the 0-line with 16+ in. of sweep, but he also threw a bunch that backed up and blended with the cutter. While the firm, lifty shape grades well in stuff models, it doesn't fit his arsenal all that well, and is the reason for the below-expected whiff rates. Selvig throws three pitches within a 7.5 mph, 19-inch horizontal and 14-inch vertical box. An incredibly high 46% foul ball rate on swings against his FF tells the whole story: hitters didn't have to sit on a particular pitch because they all slightly resembled each other, and they could still make contact with what should be a good fastball with ease. Each pitch is strong in its own right, but they cluster too tightly together. Not only should Selvig throw his sweeper slower for more horizontal movement, but he would also benefit from an even slower curveball — to expand hitters' sights vertically while broadening the velocity band. Selvig would also benefit from a sinker for right-handed hitters, expanding his arsenal further armside horizontally, alleviating his four-seam in some early counts, and increasing the distinction of his sweeper. I have yet to mention his kick changeup, a decently effective pitch to LHH at 87.6 (3/12, 1295 RMP). Strong iVB separation from the fastball will have to make up for the lack of velocity separation (-5.7 mph). Selvig had a clear plus feel for spin when I saw him in person, but he limited his arsenal by throwing a firmer, more vertical slider. It's hard to live with just a 7.5 mph gap between your hardest and slowest pitch, and he has room to expand his arsenal in both directions horizontally. A consistent 83-84 mph sweeper at (0, 17), which flashed at times last season, would do him wonders.
2
1
30
15,325
History made. 💪 A program-record 9 Gophers were selected in the 2026 @MLB Draft last weekend. 📍10th in the nation 📍2nd in the Big Ten #Gopher⚾️ | #SkiUMah〽️ | #MLBDraft
1
14
1
88
5,455
Great day to be a Gopher! 4 pitchers selected in this year’s MLB Draft - including our entire starting weekend rotation, LHP out of the pen, and - 1 incoming Fr arm in the 2026 class! 3 more positional players and 1 incoming transfer make up the 9 total selected today! Couldn’t be more happy and proud for these guys - looking forward to watching them crush it in the professional ranks! Come develop into a professional HERE! 〽️
Eight Gophers Picked on Day Two of 2026 MLB Draft z.umn.edu/bf3c
4
27
4,463
Neels ➡️ Arizona Congratulations to Weber Neels on being drafted 566th overall in the 19th round by the @Dbacks in the 2026 @MLB draft! #Gopher⚾️ | #SkiUMah〽️
1
16
1
92
4,247
Maiorana ➡️ Milwaukee Congratulations to #Gopher commit Keaton Maiorana on being drafted 461st overall in the 15th round by the @Brewers in the 2026 @MLB draft! #Gopher⚾️ | #SkiUMah〽️
9
45
4,473
Sutherland ➡️ Seattle Congratulations to Charlie Sutherland on being drafted 460th overall in the 15th round by the @Mariners in the 2026 @MLB draft! #Gopher⚾️ | #SkiUMah〽️
2
15
3
77
6,183
Spanier ➡️ Arizona Congratulations to Jack Spanier on being drafted 386th overall in the 13th round by the @Dbacks in the 2026 @MLB draft! #Gopher⚾️ | #SkiUMah〽️
16
2
71
6,143
Kruzan ➡️ Milwaukee Congratulations to Marcus Kruzan on being drafted 371st overall in the 12th round by the @Brewers in the 2026 @MLB draft! #Gopher⚾️ | #SkiUMah〽️
16
1
64
4,399
Morton ➡️ Chicago Congratulations to Isaac Morton on being drafted 188th overall in the 6th round by the @Cubs in the 2026 @MLB draft! #Gopher⚾️ | #SkiUMah〽️
20
93
6,454