Pinned Tweet
Replying to @JackMLawrence
When you create a tool to restrict speech, don’t be shocked when it’s turned on you.
One day the shoe will switch feet - and I promise you the boot won’t hurt any less just because you wore it first
Jack Lawrence retweeted
Getting suspended by the uni is one thing. Getting arrested is another. The Israel-Gaza conflict is (was?) a foreign war. Why can't Britons take sides? I favour Israel's. If he'd chanted "Ukraine Ukraine make us proud! Put the orcs all in the ground!" would he have been arrested?
🚨 UPDATE: An Oxford University student has been arrested on suspicion of inciting racial hatred after chants called on Gaza to “put the Zios in the ground”, The Telegraph can reveal.
Read more: telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/10…
Has anyone else had “Claire” from Evri helping them over email?
The website chatbot said it was escalating my issue to a human, so I naively assumed Claire was real… but after a quick search, it looks like she’s just another bot sending out scheduled emails.
(Please reply)
Jack Lawrence retweeted
We've reached a new level of terminal inanity.
There is no definition of "doxxing," generally accepted or otherwise, that would include simply saying where ICE agents have been spotted.
The entirre concept of doxxing relates to the disclosure of private personal information.
Jack Lawrence retweeted
To be clear: lol,
In fact, I will be very loud, but in the other direction: ICE agents should be shunned by decent society for long after this moment has passed.
Abuse of power is not simply an idea people have. It's a thing people do, or are complicit in.
To be clear, I'm not asking for @AriCohn to be silenced.
I'm asking him to repent and apologize very loudly, in fact.
Jack Lawrence retweeted
two notable things about this, which I had to watch slowly a few times to be sure of: the photographers were not touching or impeding the agents, and the agents physically attacked the photographers *before* saying 'get out of the fucking elevator'.
Footage taken by @Steffikeith this morning of ICE agents shoving photographers on assignment at 26 Federal Plaza. One journalist has been hospitalized.
Jack Lawrence retweeted
The money is coming straight from the Crown Prince, who actively executes journalists, ppl wnonlethal drug offenses, bloggers, etc w/out due process. A lot of the “you can’t say anything anymore!” Comedians are doing the festival 😂 they had to adhere to censorship rules to do it
Surely a better solution would be to wait and put the flag back up rather than risk killing or seriously injuring a likely near-minimum wage worker.
People in the comments saying the worker shouldn’t just “follow orders” need to get a grip. Taking down a flag isn’t a genocide
Jack Lawrence retweeted
they picked people who on every level have no idea what they are doing to incompetently blunder around changing the vaccine schedule
Breaking News: A U.S. vaccine panel voted to limit the use of a combination measles, mumps, rubella and varicella shot for children under 4.
nyti.ms/4n7erAB
Jack Lawrence retweeted
I'm not looking forward to this. at some point someone has to love our country and Constitution more than we hate our enemies. next president and Congress should pass laws to enable the victims of this - on either side - to sue the gov more easily so it can never happen again.
Jack Lawrence retweeted
If your argument is "now we do the same to you" you're not only just as bad but worse.
To all the sins of your rivals you must add hypocrisy and spite to your own.
Jack Lawrence retweeted
Some of the same people who laughed & jeered when a right-wing nutjob bludgeoned Paul Pelosi’s skull with a hammer now want folks fired for criticizing Charlie Kirk after his murder. Moral rot in the U.S. runs deep, and it's bipartisan.
Jack Lawrence retweeted
"Throwing shade" is protected by the First Amendment, and in no arena is it more protected than the political one.
Government punishment of political criticism or insult is unconstitutional and un-American.
Jack Lawrence retweeted
Now we're just trying to cancel anyone who offers a political opinion you find distasteful? Should businesses and schools be encouraged to fire everyone who claims, falsely, that Trump won the 2020 election?
Jack Lawrence retweeted
BREAKING UPDATE: The government pressured ABC — and ABC caved. The timing of ABC's decision, on the heels of the FCC chairman’s pledge to the network to “do this the easy way or the hard way,” tells the whole story. Another media outlet withered under government pressure, ensuring that the administration will continue to extort and exact retribution on broadcasters and publishers who criticize it.
We cannot be a country where late night talk show hosts serve at the pleasure of the president. But until institutions grow a backbone and learn to resist government pressure, that is the country we are.
This is getting a little hysterical, no?
The barista even offered to write “Charlie,” & Starbucks is hanging her out to dry in a mealy-mouthed statement.
People can disagree on the full name, but treating it as a scandal is absurd. Did the customer want a drink or a viral clip?
OMG
Starbucks won’t write the name Charlie Kirk on a cup because “it’s political”
Wtf is going on @Starbucks???
To be clear: I’m taking no position on whether the barista should’ve written his full name - reasonable people can argue it either way.
What is distasteful is the manufactured outrage from some on the right, and Starbucks refusing to publicly back their own employee.
Jack Lawrence retweeted
You can condemn speech you dislike. What you can’t do is use government power, even “soft power”, to punish speech that can't be constitutionally banned.
Even “informal” threats or campaigns can violate the First Amendment, that's why we have a First Amendment.
Jack Lawrence retweeted
Free speech is not in any way premised on people saying the correct things.
It is premised on the notion that government censorship is worse than people saying the wrong things.
Classic liberal free-speech advocates are living in a fantasy land of well-behaved citizens with a shared sense of the common good who self-regulate—what they say, what they do, and what they understand as right and wrong.
That might have existed in our past, were there was an unwritten code of conduct most everyone accepted, but we are now far more a country of fragmented morality, with less and less shame. So the belief that we can or should tolerate an "anything goes" attitude toward public behavior, including speech, might be intellectually appealing, but it's a recipe for a dysfunctional society with more chaos, more anarchy, and more moral relativism.
It's a nice attitude to have if you're removed from the fallout (say, in another country), but one with blinders on about our culture, where the sole moral authority has become the state/private companies, who have rushed in to fill the vacuum.
Or to put it another way, Free-speech absolutist rarely appreciate the cultural scaffolding holding societies together -- which is not the law, but social pressure





























