Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
Vance posting as if he’s an online pundit or commentator and not the vice-president in the administration that launched this war and then defended this war.
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
At the Budget, the Government introduced a higher tax on bank mega-profits to help fund support for people's energy bills.
Last night, Reform MPs voted AGAINST it.
Remember that the next time they claim to be on the side of ordinary people.
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
Congratulations to Abdul El-Sayed on a stunning victory in Michigan.
You stood up against corporate greed, against racism and against genocide.
Your incredible campaign shows that there’s something more powerful than big money, hatred and lies: hope.
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
You’re literally providing US bombers with access to UK bases.
You didn’t have to approve this and you could end your complicity today. But you won’t, because you’re too busy licking the boot of Donald Trump.
Stop gaslighting the nation. Get US troops off UK soil NOW!
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
It's utterly pathetic the way BBC presenters like Victoria Derbyshire are told by BBC bosses to say to outspoken interviewees like Bernie Sanders things like "President Trump and his family would deny they are corrupt", or "The Israeli Government would deny they are extremist". It's gross over-reaction to Trump libel action against the BBC.
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
“No more military aid to the extremist government in Israel… what they’ve done to the Palestinians is genocidal…” Bernie Sanders tells BBC Newsnight.
The presenter is quick to interject that “the Israeli government would deny they’re extremist…”
Why are we still doing this?
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
I'm a doctor in the UK with Palestinian family. I spoke out against genocide and jewish supremacy. My medical licence was suspended.
Dr Eastland Staveley, a jewish GP, said he didn't shoot enough babies in Gaza. He is practising medicine freely in Britain.
They proved my point.
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
Hi @SuellaBraverman, is he still a trooper?
He's just been charged with multiple counts of rape and offences involving indecent images of children.
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
Pimlico Plumbers boss Charlie Mullins is a union-busting rightwing donor who pretended his workers were 'self-employed' so he didn't have to give sick pay or paid leave. He's just the sort of 'wealth creator' I'd be entirely happy to see leave Britain.
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
🚨 NEW: The leader of Reform UK in Hampshire has been charged with 35 offences, including 12 counts of rape and making indecent images of a child
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
I had running battles with this vile shit
He led the protest against landing migrants in Portsmouth
Caused our RNLI station to close
Besieged a hotel mistaking a Pakistan cricket team for migrants
Losing us our City of Culture bid
& now this 👇
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
I followed this wise man today, and honestly, u should too.
The way he dismantles Israel’s carefully manufactured image and puts into words what so many are afraid to say is an absolute art form.
Every word hits. Go give him a follow @BenMoser123
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
This is what a terrorist looks like in the UK today
This is due to @Keir_Starmer @andyburnham @YvetteCooperMP @ShabanaMahmood - all Labour Friends of Apartheid Israel
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
Over 4,000 pro-Palestinian people arrested in total, and 94 year-old Margaret is taken again, despite decades of service to the country
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
People don't seem to understand that if police didn't act, we'd have 4,000 of these terrorist grannies out there, not hurting anyone at all. It doesn't bear thinking about.
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
Margaret Owen, 94, on her terrorism arrest: ‘I’m afraid I’m not the terrorist. But Israel is a terrorist state, and we are complicit in supporting a terrorist state.’
Britain arrested her twice. Its F-35 parts kept shipping. Labour arrests the witness and protects the weapons.
Jacqueline Mellett retweeted
This is the statement issued by the Met Police about the Defend Our Juries demonstration today. Commander Adam Slonecki, from Scotland Yard, said: “All those intending on coming to this event know that supporting a proscribed organisation is unlawful – they are essentially meeting to purposefully commit a crime.” This is a remarkable contrual of the law and extent of police powers. Surely it cannot be right that someone protesting against the Government’s decision to proscribe an organisation is automatically interpreted by the Met Police as supporting that organisation and is therefore committing an arrest-able offence. This is especially the case when the proscription is being challenged in the courts. I believe the government and parliament made the wrong decision in proscribing Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation and I continue to call for its deproscription by the government. If the people turning up today to demonstrate against the proscription of Palestine Action are to be arrested for simply turning up, are we all to be criminalised for suggesting the government got this wrong?



























