This ⬇️
So what has the world achieved for its 'investment' of $10,000,000,000,000?
Show me!
1,000% this: ⬇️
If @Nigel_Farage and @RupertLowe10 dont sort out their differences, we're going to be stuck with the woke useless labour government for decades.
For fucks sake put the uk first.
Blatantly obvious to anyone with even half a brain. “Unite the Right” ⬇️
Replying to @KittyRancher01
I'll be brutally honest: Restore will not win the next election. Neither will Reform on its own.
Whether you like it or not, the Conservatives remain a major part of the centre-right vote. Reform is now a major force too, and Restore is currently a very small party. So if the objective is to remove Labour, pretending one of these parties can simply replace the others is wishful thinking.
Do I think the Conservatives and Reform have all the answers? No. But I do know that three divided parties fighting over the same voters is a very effective way of keeping Labour in power. That's the reality we all need to face.
1,000% this: ⬇️
100% this ⬇️
Fossil fuels did not cause the CO2 rise. PERIOD.
Here is why we know, without wiggle room:
Every carbon source has an isotope fingerprint.
Fossil carbon: -28‰.
Ocean outgassing: -8‰. Standard values. Undisputed. In every carbon-cycle textbook. Used by the IPCC itself.
The Keeling plot reads the fingerprint of whatever is actually being added to the atmosphere. Pure mass balance. No models. No parameterizations. No assumptions.
Scripps measured it at four stations, Barrow to the South Pole, from 1978 to now.
Answer: -13.2‰.
Not -28.
Not close to -28.
Not fossil fuel.
Caribbean sclerosponges preserve that same fingerprint back to 1500 AD.
Same value.
About -13‰.
For five centuries.
Across those five centuries fossil emissions rose from essentially zero to roughly 10 billion tons of carbon per year. A ten thousand fold increase.
The isotope needle did not move.
If fossil combustion were driving atmospheric CO2, that needle would have swung hard toward -28‰.
It did not budge.
The two endmember mixing equation is arithmetic a middle schooler can do. Plug in -13.2 for the observed signature, -28 for fossil, -8 for ocean outgassing.
The fossil share of the net atmospheric addition cannot exceed 26%.
Then apply the five century constancy. In 1500 AD fossil emissions were essentially zero, so the observed -13‰ signature had to be the natural signature itself. That fixes the natural mix at -13‰. Plug that in with the modern -13.2‰.
Fossil share of the net addition: 1.3%.
Within noise of zero.
To escape the conclusion you must reject one of:
1. Elementary algebra applied to mass conservation
2. The isotope endmember values the entire carbon-cycle literature has used for sixty years
3. The Scripps and sclerosponge datasets the IPCC itself relies on
Nobody rejects any of them.
The rise in atmospheric CO2 is not the residue of your gas tank.
The isotopes rule it out.
Full stop.
😢⬇️
A tale of two countries: London and England. I’ve had the most perfect week on my little sailing boat in England. Mooring up in Woodbridge, Suffolk and others along the River Deben, then visiting Constable country around Dedham. Every village was beautiful. Every place was clean and tidy. Free of litter and graffiti. Every place was all white people. British people. People who spoke English. Villages with little honesty boxes to leave your money and take the home grown produce. The National Trust at Flatford Mill where Constable painted the haywain didn’t have books on how all white people are terrible. It had books on Constable, the beauty of his work and the beauty of the countryside. It had people enjoying tea and sandwiches sitting in the gardens in the sunshine enjoying their surroundings. It took a few days to realise the complete and utter difference between these places and London. This was England, full of the English. Then, as I came back into London, I left England and arrived back in the third world. The people weren’t English. They weren’t British. They had zero affinity with England. I was a foreigner. This is now their land, given to them by successive governments. Given to them along with the free houses and healthcare and money for life. Not in exchange for any added contribution to this country, but just for being here. Given to them with money from the sweat and toil and stress of making ends meet of the British people over hundreds of years. Walking around most of London, you would be hard pressed to know which third world country you were in. There are still some white ghettos remaining: Chelsea, Highgate, Hampstead, Kensington and Chiswick. All predominantly white areas. All the areas that given enough money, you’d choose to live. That’s not a coincidence. It’s not a coincidence that you’d choose to live in Kensington rather than Shepherd’s Bush. The English living in the villages and towns I visited are loving life. They have no idea that very soon the government will dump thousands from the third world onto them and every town like them. They will call me racist right now because to them, they have nothing to worry about. They can’t see the imminent destruction of their way of life. In the 1930s, Churchill warned that Germany was gearing up for war and people said, oh don’t be silly, it’s lovely that Germany is building so many roads and ships and planes. Once people realised why they’d built them, it was too late. Once the beautiful people in the villages of England realise they’ve been taken over and they live in the third world suddenly, it will be too late. I loved visiting England. I’m back in London now and please don’t tell me that London is in England. They’re two very different countries.
Jonathan Stollery retweeted
🚨 BREAKING;
🇷🇺 Putin: "We are giving Elon Musk 48 hours to explain why Starlink is interfering with our strategic operations. Do not test our patience."
🚀 Elon Musk: "Bro, I can literally disable your country's entire GPS system from my phone while sitting on the toilet."
Absolute cold-blooded reply. 🔥
Suicidal Empathy is a dangerous mental illness.
🚨NEW: Green party-led Bristol city council has banned residents from flying the England flag during the World Cup because its "making migrants feel uncomfortable"
[@LBC]
























