Jim Trott (@JTrott) profile picture

If we're not here to help one another, then nothing else makes sense. I am an expert on nothing other than my own opinion...and even then...

United States
Joined February 2009
Photo by Jim Trott (@JTrott)Photo by Jim Trott (@JTrott)Photo by Jim Trott (@JTrott)Photo by Jim Trott (@JTrott)Photo by Jim Trott (@JTrott)Photo by Jim Trott (@JTrott)Photo by Jim Trott (@JTrott)Photo by Jim Trott (@JTrott)
Replying to @OhHowByronic
@OhHowByronic I don’t tell pretty girls they’re pretty; especially when they’re very young. There are some women whose beauty is almost therapeutic. Combined with the aura you project, you are a member of that set, Madame.
1
4
46
I’ve never been gratuitously flirty, but that is the finest flirty thing I can imagine. It references a colleague. (My wife thinks she’s wonderful, too, but I won’t be mentioning it) I was going to send it because I didn’t want it to go to waste. Instead I sent it to you.
6
Replying to @darwintojesus
I’ve never seen a theistic account of “intrinsic human dignity” that doesn’t ultimately reduce to “God says humans matter”. That may be a theological commitment. It is not an explanation. Saying humans possess dignity because they are made in God’s image simply relocates the question: why does resemblance to, creation by, or ownership by a deity confer moral worth? If the answer is “because God values us”, then dignity rests on divine preference. If it is “because God’s nature grounds value”, then you still owe an argument connecting that nature to human worth rather than merely announcing the connection. And there’s a further irony here. Secular accounts can at least point to morally relevant properties we actually possess: sentience, interests, agency, vulnerability, social dependence, reciprocity, the capacity to suffer and flourish. Those are public features of creatures like us. “Imago Dei” is not public evidence. It is a doctrinal assertion whose force depends entirely on already accepting the theology doing the explaining. So I’m afraid “atheists merely assume human dignity” is a rather rich complaint from someone whose own account appears to begin with an invisible being conferring special status on our species and then calls that an explanation.
2
1
1
7
228
Here’s something trippy. You can determine eye-dominance by pointing to a distant object with both open, then close one eye. If your finger remains on the object, that’s the dominant. I’m OD. Tonight while demonstrating I used my left hand and it indicated OS.
1
3
48
Repeatedly left hand = OS, right hand = OD. At this point, I don’t yet know if I’m tricking myself, but it’s trippy.
1
3
21
To whom it may concern: A clever and interesting twitter pen-pal’s account has disappeared. Handle: Parisienne. S’appelle Sandrine. Any information will be appreciated.
7
57
Parisienne’s account is gone. Sandrine, où es-tu?
1
4
144
I’m using a tutorial which is genuine “très français.” When I return from a missed lesson, they’ll make fun of my accent.
1
12
287
Replying to @Maye88864
@75002Parisienne My wife has been particularly attentive and affectionate recently - as one might following an unintended fling. Today was a pleasant rainy morning, I offered make her a latte. Containers sometimes change roles. In addition to foamed milk I added salt.
2
6
256
She jumped up laughing, put her arms around my neck and exclaimed Je t’aime, mon nounours! Yep; something’s goin on.
1
2
121
How many cancer-afflicted children would you smother with a pillow for $120 million?
5
193
Never a nerd about it, I enjoyed learning; just sharp enough to *skate by without much effort - (*that could be subtitle to a biography of me.) Anyway, I enjoyed diagraming sentences. I’m guessing I wouldn’t now. Sorry; a bit peripatetic tonight. One more to fallow.
2
1
2
211
Though quite fluent in Americana, my wife mostly functions in metric and Celsius; so I translate. She demonstrated long division in France, asking me about the American version. Announcing the current method, her son took the pad, handing back a drawing of a little calculator.
2
120
Replying to @Maye88864
@75002Parisienne One of my linguistic pet thieves (peeves as interpreted by my wife’s Gallic ears): It is either at this point or at this time…not at this point in time. They’ve been doing it since Watergate and it still sounds like affectatious padding.
1
2
93
Un autre: Presenters who clearly attempt to sound proper, yet continually misuse the object of a preposition - stemming I think from early correction to not say “Elodie and me went” as the subject of a sentence.
181
One of my favorite digs: “Motorcyclists and Redheads will acknowledge one another in passing. Is there something like that for sociopaths, Laura?” @75002Parisienne
3
129
Merci, @75002Parisienne Je ne peux pas poster de réponses.
3
111
Replying to @Maye88864
@75002Parisienne Bonjour. Just spent a most comfortable night sleeping in Daniel Fauteuil.
2
3
165
Next to Robert Plante
3
115
Replying to @Maye88864
@75002Parisienne As a bachelor who prefers to live alone, I spent time in vocal self-narration and imagined conversation. I’ll do that with our Great Pyrs. A next-door visitor said I like the way you talk to your dogs.
1
3
180
With me was Beau who looks continually into your eyes as if he knows what you’re thinking - or should be thinking. “Oh, he looks so wise.” Beau has fans.
4
308
Replying to @Maye88864
@75002Parisienne Following a needlessly lengthy battle of wits with an acquaintance, an uncomfortable silence. She asked almost pleadingly if I was calling her a nut. Another pause, “If the shell fits…” At that point her eyes let go of whatever string she was clinging to.
2
3
149
She was fine, btw. That was long ago, before I became aware of never pass up an opportunity to keep your mouth shut - the ignoring of which is now my wont and sad addiction. Salute
3
118
Jim Trott retweeted
Replying to @oliverburdick
That’s the wisdom of American Freedom of Religion; you are able to assert all manner of things you can’t demonstrate. Freedom of Thought - upon which religious rests - says we’re not required to believe any of it. You can’t have your religious cake and make us eat it, too.
2
1
7
344