it'd be interesting if si produced some sort of an economy where private corporations become the primary financiers of social welfare (aka universal high income) rather than governments. i know indirectly this is what happens through taxes but imagine it working directly in some fashion (likely through ownership, growth, & some form of liquidity). the reason why is because it's pretty clear now that si will create super power law outcomes for almost all of society. & more specifically current mechanics for income redistribution like income taxes will become way less effective over time too since the income gaps will continue to increase drastically (see sf & its housing market as an early example of this). basically some form universal equity ownership as an intermediate step before full automation occurs. fun to think about all of the implications of this.

This is why the anti-cheat arms race is getting so interesting. Riot is pushing Vanguard further into hardware-backed trust, attestation, VBS/HVCI, IOMMU and deeper platform security. At the same time, AI-assisted reverse engineering is making it much faster to tear apart the software sitting on top of those protections. @k0mkc is showing heavily devirtualized VGK internals and says he can now devirtualize the entire thing. On the EAC side, @in19h has published tooling that recovers large parts of a heavily virtualized Easy Anti-Cheat Linux sample into readable code and IDA artifacts: github.com/19h/eac-linux-dev… There is an important parallel here with EDR. An EDR is only as effective as the detection engineering, threat hunting and R&D behind it. Anti-cheat works the same way. You need researchers constantly following new techniques, detection engineers turning that research into useful telemetry and detections, and people actively hunting for behaviour that existing rules may miss. That means continuously keeping up with: - new cheat architectures - kernel abuse - BYOVD - hypervisors - DMA - firmware tricks - input manipulation - virtualization + obfuscation - new bypass techniques The game was already there. AI is speeding it up and lowering the barrier to reversing, classification, devirtualization and research. That forces both sides to iterate faster. A lot of respect to the Vanguard team as well. They have clearly been keeping up with some of the most cutting-edge work in Windows security, hardware-backed trust, kernel security and anti-cheat research, and their recent Vanguard On-Demand changes show how quickly the defensive side is evolving too. This is becoming a much faster research cycle on both sides. Where does the arms race go next? Huge credit to @k0mkc and @in19h for the research. #AntiCheat #ReverseEngineering #WindowsInternals

Tiger Woods Unimpressed With Roadster As He's Flipped Dozens Of Vehicles buff.ly/dUGarJ0

BREAKING: Elon Musk unveils flying Tesla Roadster at launch event.

A retired NASA engineer who had worked on the Space Shuttle program for 25 years was hired by SpaceX at age 62. He described the first week as the most disorienting experience of his professional life. At NASA, a design change required 3 meetings, 2 committees, a review board, and 6 to 18 months of documentation. At SpaceX, his new supervisor said "if it works, build it. If it doesn't, change it by Friday." He sat at his desk after the first day and called his wife. He told her he felt like a man who had been swimming with ankle weights for 25 years and someone just cut them off. He could move. He could decide. He could build something in the morning and test it in the afternoon. The constraint that he had accepted as the nature of aerospace engineering turned out to be the nature of bureaucracy. Within 6 months he had contributed to more design iterations than he had completed in his last 5 years at NASA. Not because he was working harder. Because the time between having an idea and testing the idea collapsed from months to hours. The same brain. The same knowledge. A different operating system. He described a specific moment where he proposed a modification to a Raptor engine component. At NASA, the proposal would have entered a queue. At SpaceX, the modification was machined by the end of the day and tested by the following morning. He watched his idea become a physical object in 18 hours. At NASA, 18 hours would not have been enough to schedule the first meeting to discuss whether to schedule a meeting. He told an interviewer: "I didn't get smarter when I went to SpaceX. I got faster. The intelligence was always there. The system was in the way." The difference between SpaceX and NASA is not talent. NASA has extraordinary talent. The difference is the time between a thought and a test. SpaceX compresses it. NASA elongates it. The same engineer produces 10x more at SpaceX than at NASA because the bottleneck was never the engineer. It was the meetings about the meetings about the work.

My son tried out for his high school basketball team three years in a row and got cut every time. He's a good kid, but he's five foot six and not very fast, and the third time it broke his heart. He'd practiced every single day that summer. He came home from the final cut list and went straight to his room. The next morning, the coach called our house and asked to talk to him. He said he had a problem.

The academics think the founder who raised at $2B valuation can pay but they can’t You are a founder who owns 50% of your company and you have 20x voting rights. You owe 5% on $10B in the asset seizure tax. You owe $500M of your paper $1B. Find me a way to get a loan for half your illiquid net worth. You cant. The asset seizure proponents are dishonest and also it’s not a 5% tax on startups. It’s a 50% tax in this simple case.

that's just my face

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

i recently met a wildly successful founder who had exited for an enormous amount of money & whom i admired cuz he’d dm’ed me saying he loved my writing. i never knew cuz he’d never liked, replied to, or interacted with a single post of mine. i had absolutely no idea he was even reading, & strangely never even followed. just goes to show you the feedback loops on x are incredibly lossy. you have no idea who’s consuming your thoughts, who you’re impacting, or who absolutely despises everything you say. your visible audience & your actual audience are two very very different things.

turns out that Masha Bucher, founder of Day One Ventures. Also known for .. - being a member of the Kremlin Youth - a PR manager for Jeffery Epstein - starting a VC fund whose first investor is a (now sanctioned) Russian Bank's founder - a FBI report where a confidential source reported "Day One Ventures was in Silicon Valley to steal technology.” is not the best VC to work with.

ever wondered why you can't find housing in sf? i made a game where you try to build some. every site is a real project and every law is real. see how far you get.

Israel’s elite military tech units have produced many of the world’s largest cybersecurity companies. Unit 8200 alumni have gone on to start Wiz, Check Point, Palo Alto Networks, CyberArk, Imperva, and many more. And 3% of graduates from the elite Talpiot program have founded unicorns. @wiz_io co-founder Yinon Costica explains why these programs have become such powerful talent ecosystems, and what you actually learn during those years.

Interesting Goldman Sachs interview question. Your answer reveals more about you than you think.

I’m sorry, it’s not a “successful” startup event if most of your guests are waiting in a line the whole time. Props to everyone that got 1000+ sign ups for their SF Tech Week event, but newsflash, these events actively hurt your brand and are not building “community” as your job title suggests. When I see people posting videos of their long lines at their event, it’s not the flex you think it is. People won’t come to your events in the future since you don’t know how to craft a quality guest experience. Your “sorry demand was incredibly high and despite our best efforts we couldn’t accommodate everyone” afterwards doesn’t excuse it 😬 As someone that’s hosted 100+ of my own startup events, I'm the first to know how much work goes into organizing one, and I applaud everyone putting that work in promoting it. But I can confidently say that any good host can estimate churn better and take more active steps to send out reminders and receive attendance confirmation (e.g. requiring a secondary confirmation is sooo easy and can greatly increase your attendance estimates / cut churn in half). Sending a basic partiful reminder is not doing your job 😂 If you're hosting this week, here’s an idea. Try to send your own confirmations by text and force your guests to reply to attend so you can also have an “actively confirmed” headcount. That's literally how I use @markit_ai__ There are still tons of awesome events this SF tech week and stellar hosts doing a great job, it’s just a shame some organizers are chasing clout/vanity and hate to see peoples time wasted who traveled a long way to be here