#Boxing #Football #Fitness #Lefty #Sneakerhead #Communications #Arsenal #Wrestling Views my own
your computer screen
Joined January 2009
- Tweets42.8K
- Following1.3K
- Followers396
- Likes9.3K
Always offside whilst never in the box
Kai Havertz has been caught offside more than any other player in the Premier League this season. ❌🇩🇪
🥇 Kai Havertz (15)
🥈 Dominic Calvert-Lewin (8)
🥉 Mohammed Kudus, Alexander Isak, Brennan Johnson, Bukayo Saka (7)
📊 @OptaAnalyst
It’s really disappointing when people allow personal biases to stop them being professional and performing mental gymnastics
I watched the F1 film with Brad Pitt the other day, and there’s a moment where his character asks to add something to the car that isn’t really in the rules. The FIA punishes it, but the team can still race with the earlier car. It made me think.
In F1, the best teams live at the edge of the regulations. Sometimes the FIA allows what they’ve found, and sometimes it says that goes too far. Occasionally the rules are rewritten afterwards.
Now, City. I’m not defending them. A commission found they entered into sham agreements and broke the spending limits. A sham is an arrangement that isn’t what it claims to be, so that’s a different thing from using a gap nobody had spotted.
City deny it and will appeal. But I find it useful to ask/reflect on how people inside the club see it.
From their point of view, PERHAPS they believe they were doing what elite competitors do: looking at the rules, finding the limits, challenging interpretations and moving faster than the regulatory system.
From the outside, you might look at that and say, “That’s cheating.” From inside the organisation, they might say, “We found something nobody had thought of.”
If you believe you’ve found a way to bring money in, more or less within the rules (and the commission said it was not in the rules and it was cheating), you might tell yourself you’re just being a sharp competitor.
We are all asking “did City cheat?”. But I find this question interesting too: “how did City come to believe they weren’t?”
And understanding a mindset, or trying to, isn’t excusing it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Manchester City were found guilty of 114 out of 115 charges by an independent commission. The comparison made is not in the same ball park to the level of rule breaking Man City have committed.
premierleague.com/en/news/472777…
Feel like it’s just a lot of individual errors don’t know if it’s confidence or concentration or what
It must be stated it was the ownership at City not the club City and any talk of being dissolved etc shouldn’t mean the club is taken away from its fans but the owners should be removed