J. Andrew Lauer retweeted
Spare us the moral lecture, Obama.
This is precisely what you and Brennan’s team did to Trump in 2016 -and what Democrat Elissa Slotkin just advocated doing to anyone, including students, who chooses to work in a Trump administration.
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically.
Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country.
Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case.
Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve.
In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.
The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
"She touched him first" shows how some people view retaliatory violence; it need not be defensive, as long as it is reactionary. This is another example of the Karmelo Anthony dynamic. Diss>Rage>Reaction, all in a second or two. Folks will truly believe that's legit self-defense.
The left openly threatens the right with Lawfare. They're not even trying to hide it. They're an existential threat to the Republic. They never stop to think about what happens after they achieve their goal of absolute political dominance.
ON UCHICAGO CAMPUS: U.S. Senator from Michigan Elissa Slotkin hopes planned political prosecutions of republican leaders will scare young conservatives from getting involved in politics.
@ElissaSlotkin
J. Andrew Lauer retweeted
If this doesn't put you off war, nothing will
Writer: Ian
xitter.cf/alrakad_M/status/21108…
J. Andrew Lauer retweeted
The entire theme of my Generation X upbringing was *Actions Have Consequences*.
I think that's why i'm so fucking confused with our current reality.
J. Andrew Lauer retweeted
Have you heard of the term “PMIE”? It stands for Perpetration and Betrayal-Based Morally Injurious Events.” In a 2017 study, “Distinguishing War-Related PTSD Resulting from PMIEs” (authors Alexander Jordan, et al), the connection between PMIEs and PTSD sampled 867 Marines who experienced heavy ground combat while deployed overseas. The results showed that over a third of the Marines reported exposure to PMIEs. The researchers concluded that guilt and shame are not adequately addressed within the current classification of PTSD as defined in the DSMV (Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition). PTSD tends to focus on danger-based experiences, while shame and guilt are being overlooked in PTSD diagnosis and treatment. This study and many others are pointing to the psychological struggles of guilt, shame, and anger that are contributing to suicidal thoughts. We must educate and continue to study this phenomenon. Our active duty and veteran populations deserve to get the specific help they need.
The real divide on the right is between those who think we can vote our way out of this mess, and those who think we can't. It's largely generational, as that changes the cost-benefit calculus considerably.
The right to free expression protects the right to engage in harmless cosplay, whether as a war hero, a lawyer, or the opposite sex from your genitalia. It does not protect speech used to defraud people or to accept unearned benefits
A lawyer and an attorney are the same thing. The first I heard of any distinction was earlier this week. But falsely saying you're either, when you're not, is free speech, without some additional facts like the intent to deceive someone. You can suffer consequences for the lie, but not ones imposed by the government.
This lady thinks having your dad tell the manager at McD's that you quit at 17 is equivalent to having to get parental permission to enlist in the USMC at 17.
In California, you can call yourself a man even if you never had a penis, but you can't call yourself a lawyer even if you did graduate from law school?
I’ve never heard of the lawyer/attorney distinction before today and I’ve been a licensed lawyer/attorney for 22 years.
Replying to @dustinkittle
2 of 8 🧵
To be clear, as a licensed attorney, I do not put much weight into titles. If you have Grok or ChatGPT, you’re probably as qualified as most lawyers anyway.
In her introduction, @POTUS, perhaps in an informal sense, referred to Katie Zacharia as an attorney — fueling the media to dig into the semantics of what is a lawyer and what is an attorney.
In common usage, a lawyer is generally someone who holds a law degree; while an attorney is someone who passed the bar and is licensed to practice law.
Clearly, Zacharia holds a law degree - but the unresolved question is whether she is now, or has ever been in the past, an attorney licensed to practice law.
After graduating from @Pepperdine in 2007 and @PepperdineLaw in 2011, reports say Zacharia moved to Beijing and spent two years there (2011–2013) as an associate on the international practice team at Zhong Lun.
J. Andrew Lauer retweeted
Dear Secretary Bessent @SecScottBessent,
My name is Everett Stern. In 2010 I was a compliance officer at @HSBC. From a back office in New Castle, Delaware, I watched billions of dollars move to drug cartels, sanctioned regimes, and terrorist organizations. The enemies of the United States. I documented it, I escalated it, and when the bank would not act, I took it to the @FBI, the @CIA, and eventually the @SECGov.
The result was a $1.92 billion settlement. At the time, it was one of the largest in American history. It was also about five weeks of the bank’s profit. Not one banker was charged. Not one went to prison.
I paid a different price. I lost my career, my savings, and my place in the industry I had trained for. I was blacklisted. Every door in American finance closed at once. I slept on a camping cot in a 300 square foot apartment because I could not afford a bed, and I waited tables at @PFChangs to eat. I tell you this not for sympathy, but so you understand that I know exactly what it costs to do the right thing in American finance, and exactly how little the system does in return.
I made that sacrifice because I believed it would change something.
Yesterday, your department fined @BankofAmerica $1.2 billion for failing to report more than $5 billion in suspicious transactions, some of it tied by your own findings to Chinese laundering networks, narcotics, and the southwest border, alongside 475 apparent sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism. The bank admitted it willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act.
Fourteen years after HSBC. A bank with “America” in its name. And once again, not one individual charged.
Secretary Bessent, I want to say plainly what I believe you already know. The fines are not working.
A fine is paid by shareholders, absorbed by the balance sheet, and forgotten by the next earnings call. Bank of America reported earnings this morning. Nobody who set the alert thresholds, nobody who decided the 2024 cease and desist could wait, nobody who chose the backlog over the law will lose a single thing they value. Their lives are untouched. That is the entire reason the behavior repeats.
This is money laundering. This is blood money. Money that reaches a cartel buys fentanyl that kills Americans. Money that reaches a terrorist organization buys the next attack. This country has fought a war on drugs and a war on terror for decades, at enormous cost in lives and treasure, and all the while we have allowed the financing to flow through institutions we charter and regulate. Cut off the money and we win. We have never seriously tried.
There is also a question of equal justice that I cannot let go.
Before I walked into the FBI building to report HSBC, I stopped in front of the Great Seal on the wall and read the words engraved beneath it: “Justice is the defense of our liberty.” I believed that. I still want to. But every day in this country, people go to prison for crimes that are nothing next to moving money for the people who want Americans dead. A suit, a title, and a corporate badge should not be a shield from the consequences that apply to everyone else. If a street dealer goes to prison for what he sells, the banker who moved the cartel’s money should be standing next to him.
I also want to raise something that is rarely said in these conversations. Why has no one inside Bank of America come forward the way I did? The answer is that everyone in American banking knows what happened to me, and to the whistleblowers who came after. The last person who spoke up is the only policy anyone believes. That is a culture problem, and it starts with leadership, in the banks and in the agencies that regulate them.
This is not a political issue. It has spanned administrations of both parties. It is a national security issue, and I am asking you to treat it as one.
Three things would change the math overnight.
Refer individuals for criminal prosecution. Not the analyst in the queue. The executives who set the thresholds and chose the risk. One banker in handcuffs would do more than every fine in Treasury’s history combined.
End “too big to jail.” An institution cannot be too big to fail and too big to jail at the same time. If it is the first, it must be held to a higher standard, not a lower one.
And if Bank of America will not act as America’s bank, review its charter. A national charter is a privilege granted on behalf of the American people. It should be conditioned on not moving money for the people trying to kill them.
Secretary Bessent, you said yesterday that these actions send a clear message that even the biggest institutions are not above the law. With respect, the institution was never the problem. The people inside it are above the law, and they know it. Until that changes, I will keep writing letters like this one, and the next bank will keep paying the next fine.
I gave up everything I had to stop this. I am asking you to use the power you have to finish it.
Respectfully,
Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit
J. Andrew Lauer retweeted
These are the names of the shooters at a high school football game in Eden Prairie, Minnesota: Adam Abdihakeem Adam. Musab Ibrahim Aden. Omar Adan Abdullahi. Abdirahman Ahmed Jama. Mahamed Ali Haji. Just thought you should know.
J. Andrew Lauer retweeted
A Guardians-Brewers World Series would be the matchup Midwest baseball fans have been arguing into existence at family reunions for decades.
Everyone’s drinking. Three aunts will bring competing salads without actual veggies. Someone’s uncle will provide a route between Cleveland and Milwaukee that “saves you 20 minutes” and takes nine hours. And, yes, there will be little smokies in a crockpot older than the starting pitchers.
We’ve waited our whole lives for this. Get the good paper plates.
I’m begging you, baseball God’s.
#mlb #guardians #brewers #postseason
The Law doesn't care what really happened. The Law cares about what can be proven. These are often very different things.
We have all been watching drafted soldiers being mercilessly executed by drone operators for years now. We can handle seeing one terrorist shot dead, if we wish to tune in.














