Scientific & critical thinking. A mix of science, philosophy, psychology, and communication. Focus: transparency, COI, and biases https://xitter.cf/t.co/BF10D9AUab.

Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Joined August 2017
Ivory Embassy retweeted
Check out my guest post at @IvoryEmbassy about the “science of science,” entering the US policy conversation in the George W. Bush administration, & existing 20 yrs later as a tiny community of practice to understand how we science. #SciPol #ScienceTwitter ivoryembassy.com/science-of-…
2
1
1
200
4 years of Quora moderation. 40,000 + questions & answers revealed some patterns in how people acquire their knowledge. @santiago_gisler was kind enough to publish my analysis here. Check out my guest post on @IvoryEmbassy
How we trust knowledge: 4 popular ways of responding Check out @Shredwarrior's great contribution to Ivory Embassy, which explains how we process and share knowledge. We find four categories: Learners, Analysts, Intuitors, and Challengers. Which category do you belong to?
1
6
120
Ivory Embassy retweeted
Using war-metaphors to describe cancer is a double-edged sword. jarlebreivik.com
2
4
133
Skepticism isn’t negativity, cynicism, or denial. It’s simply proportioning our beliefs to the evidence. We’re all trying to figure things out… so have empathy for those who are misled and “temper our criticism with kindness.” #CarlSagan #Sagan
5
19
3
64
3,987
Question for scientists and science communicators: What makes you want to communicate about #science? I have many questions for you that I will likely share in the X void. But let's at least start here. #STEM #scicomm #AcademicTwitter
1
1
48
Happy to collaborate with people interested in critical communication. Contact me here or via private message.
Want to guest post? Contact me if you're interested in guest posting on Ivory Embassy. I write about science, philosophy, psychology, and communication (#SciComm), e.g., topics associated with critical thinking, transparency, engagement, COI, and biases. Have a great WE!
2
1
146
I'm preparing a critique of The Deadly Rise of Anti-Science by Dr. Peter J. Hotez for future videos and blog posts. I'll analyze the book's ideas, aims, reliability, biases, and implications on scientific trust. Make sure you don't miss my upcoming content! #scicomm
1
1
3
70
Should experts' unique expertise or authority end where empirical judgments (observations and analyses) reach their boundary and become value judgments? What do you think? #sciencecommunication #scicomm #expertise
1
1
31
"People who voted for Brexit ‘more likely to be less intelligent’, study claims." @PLOSONE What's the point here? They've been trying to find scapegoats associated with Brexit since 2016, especially among seniors and ignorant people. independent.co.uk/news/uk/po…
1
1
1
63
Trying to figure out why science journalism is weak. Is its weakness that it treats scientific stories as news pegs or hooks, diving into surface-level excitement instead of deeper exploration? #scicomm #sciencejournalism #hastygeneralization
1
1
1
96
Remember...
1
1
42
At least one of their purposes. @Ivory_Embassy
1
1
42
Ivory Embassy retweeted
"The value of a college education is not the learning of many facts but the training of the mind to think." -- A. Einstein (1879 - 1955)
97
2,205
163
10,743
906,993
Ivory Embassy retweeted
If students cannot learn the way you teach, teach them the way they learn. ✍️
56
704
40
3,986
280,746
AI companies aren't transparent enough. A report finds serious flaws in how companies develop, operate, and utilize their AI models, which harms public interest, communication, and science.
The companies behind today’s AI systems aren’t transparent enough. It may ultimately harm science, policy-making, content creators, and users. #ChatGPT #opensource #transparency #AImodel
1
1
2
53
"Although the exact workings of AI models post-machine learning remain unclear, we should know the data influencing their output." -Santiago Gisler ivoryembassy.com/blog/ai-tra… Great article @santiago_gisler
1
2
5
127
Ivory Embassy retweeted
The best way to open people's minds isn't to argue with them. It's to listen to them. When people feel understood, they become less defensive and more reflective—and develop less extreme, more nuanced views. Productive disagreements begin with curiosity, not persuasion.
98
1,357
151
5,176
842,604