I did it for the lulz

Joined July 2024
231
10,122
124
54,694
328,646
The easiest way to refute a nihil- I mean socialist- is to kill them.
Replying to @holeymoleynoley
We want to destroy what our enemies call "civilization". Your "civilization" is based on alienation and exploitation. You're probably not even a part of the bourgeois civilization. You only passively consume it.
14
782
5
6,626
42,463
I didn't go to college until I was 30. This gave me a chance to see it with the perspective of an adult. One lecture in Industrial Psychology, in particular, I will never forget. The professor spoke about how an effective job description focused on concretely measurable tasks, not vague instructions, or characteristics. For example, "maintain an 85% or greater average on customer feedback surveys", instead of "be cheerful and upbeat", or even "interact positively with customers". This means that goals are clear, and performance is measurable. A job is to do something, not be something. Once some of the students had wrapped their minds around this concept, the professor decided to do a class exercise. He asked the female students to come up with a job description for "husband". At first, this went fine. The girls noodled around a bit with things they wanted their husbands to be (tall, etc), but he was able to gradually steer them towards describing what they wanted in terms of actions. But then he asked the male students to define a wife in the same way. And all the girls became upset. Some of them had full-on meltdowns. Every single thing that a male student wanted, or expected, from his hypothetical future wife was sexist, oppressive, old-fashioned, misogynistic, patriarchal, etc. They were literally screaming. Some of them in tears. And I realized something pretty quickly. It wasn't the actual, concrete responsibilities of the female role that they objected to. It was the idea of there being a female role at all, with any attached responsibilities. These women didn't want to be wives. They wanted to be pets. What's a pet? Well a pet is not a wife, or a friend. A pet is a creature of instinct, which you bring into your home because you like how it naturally behaves. You get a cat because you want to behave like a cat, and do things a cat naturally does, like play with string, and purr when you pet him. If he's smart, he'll adapt to you somewhat, but he doesn't have responsibilities other than "be a cat". If you get a wife, you get a wife so she will do things for you, specific things that are the responsibilities of wife, like care for your home, bear and raise your children, cook nutritious meals so you don't have to eat processed slop, look after your emotional well-being, and so on. These girls didn't want to be held responsible for those things. As married women, they might have anticipated doing some of them, but only some of the time. Only when they felt like it. The cat chases the string if and when it wants to, not because chasing the string is its job. These young millenial women didn't realize it, but they wanted to be pets. And that's what they were in their college relationships. They hung out with guys when they wanted to, had sex with them when they wanted to, broke up with them for someone new when they wanted to. Their relationships had no element of reciprocal responsibilities. They were perfectly at home with the idea of men having responsibilities to them, but they would repay those men if they chose, and how they chose, not how the men actually wanted. And as I've said twice already, someone you have responsibilities to, but who has none to you, is a pet, or a child. Since our ancestors, in a moment of foolishness and weakness, allowed women to vote, it is no longer legal to dole out the corrective spankings a great many of them both need and read pornographic novels about. Therefore, the corrective measure, for any man who finds himself with a pet instead of a wife, is to withdraw from any husbandly duties and start actively searching for alternatives. This can either result in a correction of the behavior, or the end of a relationship that offers no value. Either is acceptable. This may strike some of you as dishonorable, but there is no honor in keeping a broken pact, or in serving those who despise you. Men must have the pride and self-worth to say "I will be honored and respected, or I will depart to a place where I can be, even if I must be alone there." Men must honor and respect themselves.
Replying to @RyanBtheSheezy
Because we don’t owe husbands sex that’s why.
356
2,699
235
22,355
715,730
I’m howling 🤣
275
1,570
120
15,774
971,611
OK, I'm, convinced now. "Shut up and take my money!" - Phillip J. Fry
TESLA ROADSTER: The engineers at Tesla really did think of everything.
12
10/10. Nothing to add...
En France, on a inventé le Concorde. En 1969, il décollait et atteignait Mach 2 symbole de la grandeur gaullienne, conçu pour défier les Américains. En 1972, le TGV 001 battait le record mondial à turbine (318 km/h). En 1981, le TGV électrique reliait Paris à Lyon à 260 km/h. En 2007, il pulvérisait encore le record mondial sur rail : 574,8 km/h. Dans les années 70, le plan Messmer lançait le plus grand programme nucléaire civil de l’Histoire : 58 réacteurs, jusqu’à 70-80 % de notre électricité, une indépendance énergétique que le monde entier nous enviait. Dassault, Sud-Aviation, EDF, Framatome, la SNCF : nos ingénieurs étaient les meilleurs. On avait dix à vingt ans d’avance sur presque tout le monde. Puis 1981, Mitterrand. Nationalisations massives (banques, acier, chimie, électronique, aéronautique). Semaine de 39 heures. Lois Auroux. Charges sociales qui explosent. Syndicats tout-puissants. Fiscalité punitive. Droit du travail rigidifié. En moins de cinquante ans, le socialisme a transformé un pays d’ingénieurs conquérants en un pays de grèves, de délocalisations et de stagnation relative. L’industrie est passée d’environ 28 % du PIB à 11 %. Le Concorde a été abandonné. Notre nucléaire a été presque démantelé pendant des décennies faute de choix politique mortifère. Ce n’est pas le destin, c’est le prix d’une idéologie qui a préféré redistribuer et réglementer plutôt que construire et innover. A bon entendeur.
6
😀
7
2
27
905
Pretty much lol
55
1,785
43
11,583
82,866
Že ta dohoda s USA-Rusko vadí Ukrajincům chápu. Ale že ji kritizuje EU... to je opravdu chucpe.
I really do not think the EU should lecture the US when it comes to buying fossil fuels from Russia and thereby financing the war. The EU spends 19 times more on Russian energy and fertilizer than the US, so the hysterical reaction to a few tons of Diesel is pure theatre.
8
It's rare but not a fairy tale.
101
141
13
3,806
36,571
I want that T-shirt
It’s good to have a hobby
4
4
24
It’s good to have a hobby
129
1,101
54
7,179
66,272
最近これになってる
129
4,459
305
48,468
1,185,304
intlidave retweeted
We’re not talking enough about how Cornell protected a mass rapist and how dangerous that campus is for young innocent boys.
104
445
11
8,459
48,855
Tohle je vtipný
7
intlidave retweeted
17
402
9
2,489
27,574
intlidave retweeted
Oběti grooming gangů jsou v kultuře zcela neviditelné. Známe jen čísla, přitom jich žijí desítky tisíc. Lidi tvořící kulturu nezajímají. Zajímají je jiná témata, jiné (pseudo)oběti. Není potřeba upřesňovat. Tady jeden tragicky příběh:
Something I don't talk about. My partner ended her life this year, I met her 6 years ago and I didn't at first when we met but she is a grooming gang survivor. I love her and always will. I can sit here and turn to oblivion or I can be the light for justice in her memory. ❤️🫶
4
12
107
3,053
Reminder that it is no wonder Progs all turned on Harry Potter, its main lessons are: The government can't be trusted Arming teenagers & starting militias is cool Jocks are the good guys Get married and reproduce Don't give a word power by not saying it Family matters most-
65
388
23
5,223
52,322