I don't like bad faith arguments.

Joined August 2025
Bad Faith Detector retweeted
This is beautiful. This is what capital G Gamers deserve, perfectly smooth and thoughtless UE5 slop with ur favourite character printed on the box. Games playable by slime mold. Use your amoeba sense to find the oats at the end of the maze you fucking dog
nah this game sounds fucking horrible man I can’t 😭
172
4,039
72
47,936
972,108
If people weren't stupid, they'd recognize that his argument is actually flawed. But they don't even understand his argument in the first place. He's saying oppression can't cause crime because crime rates of blacks were lower back then. That's flawed logic because...(1/2)
Charlie Kirk actually said that black people were better off in slavery and subjugation before the 1940’s. “It was bad & it was evil but they committed less crimes” This was insane 😭
1
2
386
That's a flawed argument because we can easily come up with examples of oppressive government policies that could result in more crime. For example, what if the government was deliberately leaking lead into the water supply to harm some group? That would increase crime. (2/2)
1
1
144
So Charlie's argument against systemic racism is just a bad one. There are much better arguments against it, such as the fact that Chinese immigrants have done way better than blacks, in some years better than native whites, despite historical 'racism' against them.
1
55
Realistically though, if you do cut foreign aid, there will undoubtedly be deaths. Better to own up to it and say it's necessary. If we never cut foreign aid, the population of dependents will increase in number (as they have) and be dependent on it until it collapses.
Exactly. And they cannot cite a single name of someone who died out of the “millions” they falsely claim have died. Not a single name!
127
So genetics matter, then? And if they do matter, why would it not vary among populations that had generations apart in different environments?
how the hell is this dude lecturing us about genetics
161
Bad Faith Detector retweeted
Replying to @SunitaGoya73975
It’s great watching you guys have to pretend you found this funny
29
39
1
6,405
38,105
Bad Faith Detector retweeted
We spend 66% of our money on social welfare and education. 8% goes to the military. 9% goes to paying interest on the debt incurred by funding the 66%.
Zohran Mamdani: “I wish the words of Tupac from the 90’s weren’t still prescient, but they continue to be true for too many which is that we always have money for war and not to feed the poor”
299
2,565
132
11,408
541,097
If having empathy means people are less happy, why is the human psyche punishing people for having it? Effectively, it's natural selection punishing the overly-empathetic.
No, I am pretty sure it's the lack of empathy.
1
162
Look at the way these people enjoy it when localizers vandalize things with their shitty 'jokes' and slang. It's all out of petty in-group vs out-group spite.
I love how the localizers are so aware that there's a side that hates them. Keep slaying, kings. #Kainokiseki
2
228
Bad Faith Detector retweeted
In other words the left is in sort of a catch 22 when it comes to Epstein. The fewer things in the files that are damning to the left, the more innocent it makes Trump look, because it means the Biden admin had no reason to NOT release the files if they condemned Trump.
1
120
Bad Faith Detector retweeted
The trump admin could have released files that hurt democrats if they existed. But they didn't because they weren't any, really. So then, why didn't the Biden admin release the files on Trump? Because there isn't anything on that either. It's almost all a conspiritard hoax.
1
1
103
Hey now, she never said the billion kids have to be the husband's.
- no divorce for any reason
1
167
Yea we can't warn people about doing things that endanger their lives, because then we'd be thinking like the criminals
2
186
Much of the difference between conservatives and liberals is moral + tribal allegiance, not intellectual. The policy differences between the parties are coincidental rather than based on first principles. Try explaining how being pro-choice is tied to being an environmentalist.
1
144
No, "conservative American men" didn't do that. Let's just be honest here, the only reason the Left downplays Sydney Sweeney's looks while the Right does the opposite, is because of tribalistic culture war BS. If Sweeney had the beliefs of Jennifer Lawrence it'd be the opposite
I remember when conservative American men viewed Candice Swanepoel as the ideal. Now it’s Sydney Sweeney. Candice Swanepoel ➡️ Sydney Sweeney is a HUGE aesthetic shift, if you ask me. Something changed. What do you think it was? xitter.cf/superficlaldoll/status…
1
2
310
It is irritating the mental gymnastics people do to try to avoid confronting that basic reality. They want to think their side is 'objective', I guess. It's laughable.
66
The reason it feels weird to have average women attracting high value men is because men strongly value physical attractiveness, more than women do. Women are evolutionarily incentivized to care about their own beauty, in a way that men aren't.
observing a very interesting phenomenon where romance anime targeted at women will have both the fmc and mmc be unrealistically gorgeous while romance anime targeted at men usually only has the girl being unrealistically gorgeous while the guy is. well, average at best
112
Imagine the arrogance of believing you'll know what future history students will believe. You guys had 250 years where things somewhat moved in your favor (though in many ways haven't). That amount of time is nothing. You have no idea how human societies will change.
I know the vibes don’t indicate as much right now (especially on social media) but this stuff ***will*** end up biting the conservative movement in the ass. History students a couple decades from now are going to see images like this and think “how in the actual fuck??”
354
If you're reading this you are hoarding from the poor, right now. You could doing volunteer work in Africa or elsewhere, but instead you're on twitter. Gonna watch Netflix tonight? You selfish pig. Why not help some poor people instead? Human nature reveals the truth.
1
1
129
The truth is, people do not think in terms of what that ethics question is posing. That's why "is it ethical to steal" is more relevant than "is it ethical to hoard". Human beings don't really want to be altruistic. Instead, they lie to themselves and others about it.
1
60