@INSITEvan on BLUESKY Tweets by #HarmReduction Advocates and Do Not Necessarily Reflect the Views of VCH or PHS #insitesaveslives

Downtown Eastside, Vancouver
Joined February 2012
Insitevan is also on Bluesky @insitevan.bsky.social #harmreduction #insitesaveslives
11
4
8
502
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
Last advance voting day in #Vancouver!
2
1
14
780
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
I did an event in Kelowna on Saturday and there was a lot of talk about involuntary care so I wrote this last night Here's my question to every politician pushing involuntary treatment: If you genuinely want people to recover, why are you more focused on forcing them into treatment than addressing the conditions that make recovery so difficult in the first place? I'm not speaking from a textbook or a political talking point. I'm speaking from lived experience. I've lived through homelessness, poverty, trauma, mental health struggles, addiction and systems that were supposed to help but too often failed. I know firsthand that you cannot simply force someone to want a different life, and I know how difficult it is to move forward when you're struggling just to survive. You cannot force someone into stability. You have to create the conditions that make stability possible. Where are your guarantees of safe, affordable housing? Where are the meaningful employment opportunities? Where is the accessible counselling, mental health care and long-term support? Treatment doesn't erase poverty, It doesn't put a roof over someone's head, it doesn't magically create employment, heal trauma or give someone a sense of purpose. And sending someone back into the same circumstances that contributed to their struggles isn't a plan for lasting recovery, it's actually insanity. So here's my challenge to every politician advocating involuntary treatment: Before you tell the public how many people you want to force into treatment, tell us how many people you're willing to help build a future for. How many homes will you provide? How many employment opportunities will you create? What long-term support will you guarantee? And most importantly, have you actually listened to the people who have lived through what you're making policies about? Because the DATA doesn't support success from forcing people. They need dignity, they need choices, they need stability, they need hope, and they need a genuine opportunity to build a better life. Stop asking how to force people into recovery. Start asking what you're doing to make recovery possible. Are you trying to change people's lives, or just remove the visible evidence of the problems you've failed to address?
36
135
17
360
10,842
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
Every time I say “housing is a human right,” someone screams, “I don't want my taxes paying for someone else's housing!” I hate to break it to you, but your taxes are already paying for homelessness. Emergency shelters, hospitals, policing, courts, jails, and crisis services. We're spending billions managing the consequences of people having nowhere to live. So here's my question: If you're so concerned about your tax dollars, why are you more comfortable paying to manage homelessness than investing in ending it? Refusing to fund housing doesn't mean you stop paying, it means you keep paying for the crisis. You can't call yourself fiscally responsible while ignoring the cost of doing nothing.
256
628
33
2,054
23,225
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
Before you tell the public how many people you want to force into treatment, tell us how many people you're willing to help build a future for. How many homes will you provide? How many employment opportunities will you create? What long-term support will you guarantee?
I did an event in Kelowna on Saturday and there was a lot of talk about involuntary care so I wrote this last night Here's my question to every politician pushing involuntary treatment: If you genuinely want people to recover, why are you more focused on forcing them into treatment than addressing the conditions that make recovery so difficult in the first place? I'm not speaking from a textbook or a political talking point. I'm speaking from lived experience. I've lived through homelessness, poverty, trauma, mental health struggles, addiction and systems that were supposed to help but too often failed. I know firsthand that you cannot simply force someone to want a different life, and I know how difficult it is to move forward when you're struggling just to survive. You cannot force someone into stability. You have to create the conditions that make stability possible. Where are your guarantees of safe, affordable housing? Where are the meaningful employment opportunities? Where is the accessible counselling, mental health care and long-term support? Treatment doesn't erase poverty, It doesn't put a roof over someone's head, it doesn't magically create employment, heal trauma or give someone a sense of purpose. And sending someone back into the same circumstances that contributed to their struggles isn't a plan for lasting recovery, it's actually insanity. So here's my challenge to every politician advocating involuntary treatment: Before you tell the public how many people you want to force into treatment, tell us how many people you're willing to help build a future for. How many homes will you provide? How many employment opportunities will you create? What long-term support will you guarantee? And most importantly, have you actually listened to the people who have lived through what you're making policies about? Because the DATA doesn't support success from forcing people. They need dignity, they need choices, they need stability, they need hope, and they need a genuine opportunity to build a better life. Stop asking how to force people into recovery. Start asking what you're doing to make recovery possible. Are you trying to change people's lives, or just remove the visible evidence of the problems you've failed to address?
3
3
263
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
BC Supreme Court rules that helping people stay alive is not illegal; in fact, it is courageous. People at VANDU are jubilant hearing this news. What a welcome relief from the regular programming that attacks drug users and those who support them. cbc.ca/news/canada/british-c…
15
93
8
299
9,555
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
A huge day for drug policy, safer supply, and the rights of people who use drugs. The @DULFBC ruling is a powerful reminder that criminalization doesn’t exist in a vacuum people’s lives and access to safer options matter. Huge win for DULF and PWUD! cbc.ca/news/canada/british-c…
3
20
3
58
2,577
You can be annoyed Eby dropped the writ. It wasn’t “sporting” but it’s politics: the opposition would’ve done the same. That said, BC Cons are full of antivax weirdos and transphobic neofascists. As long as they fail to vet to keep the Far Right out, they don’t deserve your vote.
150
78
11
288
8,767
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
I’m having Déjà vu … it feels like 2024 all over again, with the new B.C. Conservative leader showing a fundamental lack of understanding about the toxic drug crisis just like John Rustad did. And his candidates are spreading misinformation just like they did two years ago. “It’s election time, better start punching down on people with mental health and substance use issues!” Here’s something different though: B.C.’s current drug policies seem to be working. Not the stellar wedge issue you think it is #BCpoli.
44
88
3
194
6,771
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
You’re showing your ignorance Margareta. No one is suppressing anything. The problems are well known, it’s a declared public health emergency in BC. Every province in Canada and every state in the U.S. continues to invest millions trying to solve this incredibly complex problem. There are many tools in play: enforcement, prevention, harm reduction, detox, treatment, but no place has solved it. One thing we do know: posting dehumanizing photos doesn’t help. (Well, I guess Gavin thinks it will help him get elected.)
Responses to @gavindew's post are instructive: more strident outrage to a "privacy violation" than to the reality pictured. But sure, let's put more effort into suppressing depictions of real life street disorder. That should work, right? The whole point is that this isn't a rare one-off in our province anymore. Whole blocks of downtown Vancouver at any given moment feature clusters of people passed out of with pipes or needles in hand.
23
25
97
4,334
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
It was Sept. 14, 2003, when history was made in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside neighbourhood. North America’s first-ever supervised injection site, Insite, opened to the public. #INSITE20 #insitesaveslives #dtes #HarmReduction vancouver.citynews.ca/2023/0…
5
45
3
113
23,321
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
Yesterday in Costco, I heard, “Mr. Felicella?” It was a retired judge who had dealt with me in court years ago. She told me she’d been following my recovery, called what I’ve accomplished “nothing short of a miracle,” and said she was a big fan. Years ago, I stood in front of her because my life was falling apart. Yesterday, she stood in front of me celebrating what my life had become. Never underestimate what recovery can make possible. ❤️
132
258
9
2,192
24,870
Under first-past-the-post, freedom of information is little more than an honour system politicians can tear up when it's inconvenient. Proportional representation would prevent this kind of abuse by requiring multi-party consensus rather than relying on the whims of one premier.
11
35
1,001
Under First-past-the-post, Conservatives can ignore urban ridings and Liberals can ignore rural ones while still winning majorities. This polarizes politics and causes extreme policy swings. Proportional representation ensures every voice in every region counts.
11
23
768
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
We met with Dr Brian Conway this morning at the Ashtrey Recovery Resource Centre. We talked about ways we can continue to work together to provide seamles healthcare for homless folks in the DTES. He said - This is exactly what we need. Grassroots, frontline, street access showers, shelter, food and recovery services. Its so nice talking to doctors that work on the frontlines and understand what is needed. We all agree people need more help.
1
5
32
909
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
Beautiful! - Manitoba (even w a Conservative Mayor) moving forward using evidenced-based Public Health tools! While Vancouver & BC move backwards... @matthew__bonn @guyfelicella @Dave_Eby @bcndp @avilewis @NDP ahwc.ca/programs/safer-consu…
3
6
123
Insiteful Vancouver retweeted
As a person in recovery who has changed his life and now spends his time helping others find their own pathway to recovery, I find this deeply troubling. Addiction should NEVER be used as a political weapon. Spreading misinformation about addiction, harm reduction and recovery doesn’t just score political points, it hurts real people. It stigmatizes people struggling right now, dismisses those working toward recovery and undermines the people and organizations doing this work every single day. There ARE pathways out of addiction. I’m living proof of that. We should be bringing people together around evidence, lived experience, compassion and solutions, not politicizing a crisis that is already taking far too many lives. People struggling with addiction deserve better than being used as political props! #bcpoli
Well this is disappointing, to say the least. Apparently there was a “public safety roundtable” organized by ABC Vancouver yesterday (International Overdose Awareness Day). But it doesn’t appear it was open to the public at all … only to invited guests and people who share the mayor’s narrow opinions on the drug crisis. None of these panel participants actually work in recovery services in Vancouver, and judging by the social media content they’re producing, they don’t even know anything about how to access it (there’s a single phone number!) TO STATE THERE IS NO PATHWAY OUT OF ADDICTION IS FALSE. And what, for the love of all that’s holy, is the “status quo”? There’s no such thing. ➡️ The contents of the illicit drug supply are constantly changing ➡️ The rate of overdose is constantly changing ➡️ The number of recovery beds and programs is growing ➡️ Life-saving harm reduction programs in Vancouver are being limited. So nope. This supposed “status quo” that isn’t working doesn’t exist. Looks like this round table was just more political rhetoric in an echo chamber. A total waste of time, when what we need are real solutions that work. And Julian, this is why you don’t deserve an apology from me for saying you spread misinformation. BECAUSE YOU DO.
2
30
64
1,573