Increasingly engaged with the digital future and decentralized systems, he follows the evolution of $ICP https://nitter.cf/t.co/tokfuqSvVT https://nitter.cf/t.co/bbyxuvJA3f

Kingdom of Saudi
Joined December 2009
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” LEDGER SUPPLY CHAIN ATTACK! MORE EUROPEAN RETAILERS UNDER SCRUTINY! THE OLD SAYING WAS: โ€œNOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR CRYPTO.โ€ BUT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE HARDWARE YOU TRUST HAS BEEN TAMPERED WITH BEFORE YOU EVEN OPEN THE BOX? ๐Ÿ” Security researcher @Darkfost_Coc has reportedly identified a second compromised Ledger device at MediaMarkt, raising concerns about the European distribution chain. ๐Ÿ“‚ REPORTED FINDINGS โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿšจ CryptoBilis โ€” compromised devices discovered โ”ฃ ๐Ÿšจ MediaMarkt โ€” compromised devices discovered โ”ฃ ๐Ÿข Aqipa GmbH โ€” distributor under scrutiny โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ›’ Saturn โ€” potential exposure being examined โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ›’ Fnac โ€” potential exposure being examined โ”— ๐Ÿ›’ Boulanger โ€” potential exposure being examined โš ๏ธ There is currently NO evidence that devices sold by Saturn, Fnac or Boulanger have been compromised. And Aqipaโ€™s involvement in the distribution chain does not establish that it caused or knowingly facilitated tampering. BUT THIS RAISES A FUNDAMENTAL QUESTION! IF YOUR SECURITY DEPENDS ON TRUSTING EVERY LINK IN A HARDWARE SUPPLY CHAIN, HOW SECURE IS THAT TRUST? NOW LOOK AT WHAT @dfinity HAS BUILT WITH $ICP! ๐Ÿ“‚ โ™พ๏ธ INTERNET COMPUTER SECURITY โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช Internet Identity โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Passwordless authentication โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ‘† Device-based passkeys โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”‘ Hardware security key support โ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ Threshold cryptography โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Application-specific identities โ”— ๐ŸŒ Decentralised authentication infrastructure Internet Identity allows users to authenticate without managing a traditional seed phrase. ICPโ€™s threshold cryptography also enables certain blockchain signing operations without reconstructing a complete private key on a conventional server. THAT IS A DIFFERENT SECURITY ARCHITECTURE! However, Internet Identity does not eliminate compromised-device risks, and it is not a universal replacement for hardware wallets. THE REAL LESSON? SECURITY MUST EXTEND BEYOND THE PRIVATE KEY! It must include hardware integrity, software verification, supply chain controls and secure authentication. โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE SECURITY ARCHITECTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #Ledger #CyberSecurity #SupplyChainSecurity #InternetIdentity #Blockchain ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
๐Ÿšจ LEDGER SUPPLY CHAIN ATTACK: MORE EUROPEAN RETAILERS FLAGGED AS POTENTIALLY AT RISK @Darkfost_Coc has expanded his watchlist of Ledger resellers after discovering a second tampered device at MediaMarkt. Aqipa GmbH, an official Ledger distributor since August 2023, has been linked to the distribution chain, raising concerns about potential exposure at other European retailers, including Saturn, Fnac, and Boulanger. Only CryptoBilis and MediaMarkt have been publicly linked to confirmed discoveries of compromised devices. There is currently no evidence that the other retailersโ€™ inventory has been compromised.
1
5
59
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” ุฑุณุงู„ุฉ ุฅู„ู‰ ุญูƒูˆู…ุฉ ุงู„ูˆู„ุงูŠุงุช ุงู„ู…ุชุญุฏุฉ ุงู„ุฃู…ุฑูŠูƒูŠุฉ ูˆุฌู…ูŠุน ุญูƒูˆู…ุงุช ุงู„ุนุงู„ู…! ุงู„ุฃู…ู† ุงู„ู‚ูˆู…ูŠ ูŠุจุฏุฃ ุจุงู„ุฃู…ู† ุงู„ุฑู‚ู…ูŠ! ุชุดูŠุฑ ุชู‚ุงุฑูŠุฑ ุฅู„ู‰ ูˆู‚ูˆุน ุงุฎุชุฑุงู‚ ุฃู…ู†ูŠ ู…ุฑุชุจุท ุจูˆุฒุงุฑุฉ ุงู„ุฏูุงุน ุงู„ุฃู…ุฑูŠูƒูŠุฉ (ุงู„ุจู†ุชุงุบูˆู†)ุŒ ูŠูุฒุนู… ุฃู†ู‡ ุฃุฏู‰ ุฅู„ู‰ ูƒุดู ู…ุนู„ูˆู…ุงุช ุดุฎุตูŠุฉ ุชุฎุต ุฃูƒุซุฑ ู…ู† 3 ู…ู„ุงูŠูŠู† ุดุฎุตุŒ ุจูŠู†ู‡ู… ุนุณูƒุฑูŠูˆู† ูˆู…ุญุงุฑุจูˆู† ู‚ุฏุงู…ู‰ ูˆุฃูุฑุงุฏ ู…ุฑุชุจุทูˆู† ุจูˆุฒุงุฑุฉ ุงู„ุฏูุงุน. ๐Ÿ“‚ ๐Ÿ”ด ุงู„ุจูŠุงู†ุงุช ุงู„ุญุณุงุณุฉ ุงู„ุชูŠ ูŠูู‚ุงู„ ุฅู†ู‡ุง ุชุนุฑุถุช ู„ู„ูƒุดู โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช ุฃุฑู‚ุงู… ุงู„ุถู…ุงู† ุงู„ุงุฌุชู…ุงุนูŠ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“… ุชูˆุงุฑูŠุฎ ุงู„ู…ูŠู„ุงุฏ โ”ฃ ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ ู…ุนู„ูˆู…ุงุช ุนู† ุงู„ุชุฎุตุตุงุช ุงู„ุนุณูƒุฑูŠุฉ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ‘ฅ ุจูŠุงู†ุงุช ุงู„ุชุนุฑูŠู ุงู„ุดุฎุตูŠุฉ โ”— ๐Ÿšจ ูˆุตูˆู„ ุบูŠุฑ ู…ุตุฑุญ ุจู‡ ูŠูุฒุนู… ุฃู†ู‡ ุงุณุชู…ุฑ ุนุฏุฉ ุฃุดู‡ุฑ ุฅุฐุง ุชุฃูƒุฏุช ู‡ุฐู‡ ุงู„ู…ุนู„ูˆู…ุงุชุŒ ูุฅู†ู†ุง ู†ุชุญุฏุซ ุนู† ุฅุฎูุงู‚ ุฎุทูŠุฑ ููŠ ุญู…ุงูŠุฉ ุจูŠุงู†ุงุช ุดุฏูŠุฏุฉ ุงู„ุญุณุงุณูŠุฉ. ูˆู‡ุฐู‡ ุฑุณุงู„ุชูŠ ุงู„ู…ุจุงุดุฑุฉ ุฅู„ู‰ ูˆุงุดู†ุทู†! ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ @WhiteHouse ๐Ÿ›๏ธ @DeptofDefense ๐Ÿ” @CISAgov ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง @GOVUK ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ @EU_Commission ู„ู‚ุฏ ุญุงู† ุงู„ูˆู‚ุช ู„ุชู‚ูŠูŠู… ุชู‚ู†ูŠุฉ ุงู„ุฅู†ุชุฑู†ุช ูƒู…ุจูŠูˆุชุฑ $ICP ุงู„ุชูŠ ุทูˆุฑุชู‡ุง @dfinity ุจุตูˆุฑุฉ ุฌุฏูŠุฉ! ุชู†ูู‚ ุงู„ุญูƒูˆู…ุงุช ู…ู„ูŠุงุฑุงุช ุงู„ุฏูˆู„ุงุฑุงุช ู„ุญู…ุงูŠุฉ ุงู„ู…ุนู„ูˆู…ุงุช ุงู„ุญุณุงุณุฉุŒ ูˆู…ุน ุฐู„ูƒ ู„ุง ุชุฒุงู„ ุงู„ุฃู†ุธู…ุฉ ุงู„ุชู‚ู„ูŠุฏูŠุฉ ู…ุนุฑุถุฉ ู„ู„ุงุฎุชุฑุงู‚ ุจุณุจุจ ุณุฑู‚ุฉ ุจูŠุงู†ุงุช ุงู„ุฏุฎูˆู„ุŒ ูˆุฃุฎุทุงุก ุงู„ุฅุนุฏุงุฏุงุชุŒ ูˆุงู„ูˆุตูˆู„ ุบูŠุฑ ุงู„ู…ุตุฑุญ ุจู‡. ุงู„ุชูƒู†ูˆู„ูˆุฌูŠุง ุงู„ุชูŠ ุชุชูŠุญ ุจู†ุงุก ุฃู†ุธู…ุฉ ู…ุฎุชู„ูุฉ ู…ูˆุฌูˆุฏุฉ ุจุงู„ูุนู„! ๐Ÿ“‚ โ™พ๏ธ ู…ุงุฐุง ุชู‚ุฏู… ุดุจูƒุฉ INTERNET COMPUTERุŸ โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” ุชุดููŠุฑ Chain-key ุงู„ู…ุชู‚ุฏู… โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช ุงู„ู‡ูˆูŠุฉ ุงู„ุฑู‚ู…ูŠุฉ Internet Identity โ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ ุณุฌู„ุงุช ุชุทุจูŠู‚ุงุช ูŠู…ูƒู† ูƒุดู ุงู„ุนุจุซ ุจู‡ุง โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ ุตู„ุงุญูŠุงุช ูˆุตูˆู„ ู‚ุงุจู„ุฉ ู„ู„ุจุฑู…ุฌุฉ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”‘ ุชูˆู‚ูŠุนุงุช ุชุดููŠุฑูŠุฉ ู…ูˆุฒุนุฉ Threshold Signatures โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“œ ุจูŠุงู†ุงุช ู‚ุงุจู„ุฉ ู„ู„ุชุญู‚ู‚ ุชุดููŠุฑูŠุงู‹ โ”ฃ โ˜๏ธ ุจู†ูŠุฉ ุญูˆุณุจุฉ ู„ุงู…ุฑูƒุฒูŠุฉ โ”— ๐ŸŒ ุฅู…ูƒุงู†ุงุช ู„ุจู†ุงุก ุจู†ูŠุฉ ุชุญุชูŠุฉ ุฑู‚ู…ูŠุฉ ุฐุงุช ุณูŠุงุฏุฉ ุงู„ุฃู…ุฑ ุฃูƒุจุฑ ุจูƒุซูŠุฑ ู…ู† ู…ุฌุฑุฏ ุนู…ู„ุฉ ุฑู‚ู…ูŠุฉ! ู†ุญู† ู†ุชุญุฏุซ ุนู† ุญู…ุงูŠุฉ ุงู„ู…ูˆุงุทู†ูŠู† ูˆุงู„ุนุณูƒุฑูŠูŠู† ูˆุงู„ุณุฌู„ุงุช ุงู„ูˆุทู†ูŠุฉ ูˆุงู„ุชุทุจูŠู‚ุงุช ุงู„ุญูƒูˆู…ูŠุฉ ุงู„ุญุณุงุณุฉ. ุชู‚ุฏู… $ICP ุฃุฏูˆุงุช ุชู‚ู†ูŠุฉ ู„ุจู†ุงุก ุชุทุจูŠู‚ุงุช ูŠู…ูƒู† ููŠู‡ุง ูุฑุถ ุงู„ุตู„ุงุญูŠุงุชุŒ ูˆุชุนุฒูŠุฒ ุงู„ู…ุณุงุกู„ุฉุŒ ูˆุงู„ุชุญู‚ู‚ ู…ู† ุณู„ุงู…ุฉ ุงู„ุจูŠุงู†ุงุช ุจุงุณุชุฎุฏุงู… ุงู„ุชุดููŠุฑ. ูˆุจุงู„ุทุจุนุŒ ู„ุง ุชูˆุฌุฏ ุดุจูƒุฉ ุจู„ูˆูƒุชุดูŠู† ุชุฌุนู„ ุงู„ุฃู†ุธู…ุฉ ุงู„ุณุฑูŠุฉ ุขู…ู†ุฉ ุชู„ู‚ุงุฆูŠุงู‹. ูู„ุง ุจุฏ ู…ู† ุงู„ุชุดููŠุฑ ุงู„ู…ู†ุงุณุจุŒ ูˆุนุฒู„ ุงู„ุฃู†ุธู…ุฉุŒ ูˆุฅุฏุงุฑุฉ ุงู„ุตู„ุงุญูŠุงุชุŒ ูˆุงู„ุงุฎุชุจุงุฑุงุช ุงู„ุฃู…ู†ูŠุฉ ุงู„ู…ุณุชู‚ู„ุฉ. ู„ูƒู† ู„ู…ุงุฐุง ุชุชุฌุงู‡ู„ ุงู„ุญูƒูˆู…ุงุช ุจู†ูŠุฉ ุญูˆุณุจุฉ ู…ุฎุชู„ูุฉ ุฌุฐุฑูŠุงู‹ ุนู† ุงู„ู†ู…ุงุฐุฌ ุงู„ุชู‚ู„ูŠุฏูŠุฉุŸ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ุงู„ูˆู„ุงูŠุงุช ุงู„ู…ุชุญุฏุฉ ุงู„ุฃู…ุฑูŠูƒูŠุฉ ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง ุงู„ู…ู…ู„ูƒุฉ ุงู„ู…ุชุญุฏุฉ ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ ุงู„ุงุชุญุงุฏ ุงู„ุฃูˆุฑูˆุจูŠ ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ุงู„ู…ู…ู„ูƒุฉ ุงู„ุนุฑุจูŠุฉ ุงู„ุณุนูˆุฏูŠุฉ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช ุงู„ุฅู…ุงุฑุงุช ุงู„ุนุฑุจูŠุฉ ุงู„ู…ุชุญุฏุฉ ุงู„ุชุญุฏูŠ ุนุงู„ู…ูŠุŒ ูˆุงู„ุญู„ูˆู„ ูŠุฌุจ ุฃู† ุชูƒูˆู† ุนู„ู‰ ู…ุณุชูˆู‰ ู‡ุฐุง ุงู„ุชุญุฏูŠ! ุฃุฏุนูˆ ุงู„ุญูƒูˆู…ุงุช ูˆุงู„ู…ุคุณุณุงุช ุงู„ุฏูุงุนูŠุฉ ูˆุงู„ุฌู‡ุงุช ุงู„ุชู†ุธูŠู…ูŠุฉ ุฅู„ู‰ ุฏุฑุงุณุฉ ุชู‚ู†ูŠุฉ $ICP ูˆุงุฎุชุจุงุฑู‡ุง ูˆุชู‚ูŠูŠู… ุงุณุชุฎุฏุงู…ู‡ุง ููŠ ุงู„ุชุทุจูŠู‚ุงุช ุงู„ุญูƒูˆู…ูŠุฉ ุงู„ู…ู†ุงุณุจุฉ. ู„ูŠุณ ุจุณุจุจ ุณุนุฑ ุงู„ุนู…ู„ุฉ! ุจู„ ุจุณุจุจ ุงู„ู‚ุฏุฑุงุช ุงู„ุชู‚ู†ูŠุฉ ุงู„ุชูŠ ุชู‚ุฏู…ู‡ุง! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties @USGSA @NIST @DHSgov @NATO @EU_Commission @GOVUK @DGA_SA @SDAIA_SA @UNDP @WorldBank โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” ุงู„ุฃุณูˆุงู‚ ุชุฑุงู‚ุจ ุณุนุฑ ุงู„ุนู…ู„ุฉุŒ ูˆุฃู†ุง ุฃุฑุงู‚ุจ ุงู„ุจู†ูŠุฉ ุงู„ุชุญุชูŠุฉ ุงู„ุชูŠ ูŠุฌุฑูŠ ุจู†ุงุคู‡ุง! ๐ŸŒ internetcomputer.org #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #ุงู„ุฃู…ู†_ุงู„ุณูŠุจุฑุงู†ูŠ #ุงู„ุฃู…ู†_ุงู„ู‚ูˆู…ูŠ #ุงู„ุณูŠุงุฏุฉ_ุงู„ุฑู‚ู…ูŠุฉ #ุงู„ุจู„ูˆูƒุชุดูŠู† #ุงู„ุชุญูˆู„_ุงู„ุฑู‚ู…ูŠ ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ ุฅุนุฌุงุจ | ๐Ÿ” ุฅุนุงุฏุฉ ู†ุดุฑ | ๐Ÿ’ฌ ุชุนู„ูŠู‚ โ™พ๏ธ ุนู†ูˆุงู† ุงู„ุชุจุฑุน ุจุนู…ู„ุฉ ICP: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” A MESSAGE TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND EVERY GOVERNMENT ON EARTH! NATIONAL SECURITY MUST INCLUDE DIGITAL SECURITY! Reports allege that a Pentagon-related security breach exposed personal information belonging to MORE THAN 3 MILLION PEOPLE, including military personnel and veterans. The reported information includes: ๐Ÿ“‚ SENSITIVE PERSONAL DATA โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช Social Security numbers โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“… Dates of birth โ”ฃ ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ Military occupational information โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Personal identification records โ”— ๐Ÿšจ Alleged unauthorised access over several months If confirmed, this represents a serious failure to protect sensitive information. AND HERE IS MY MESSAGE TO WASHINGTON! ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ @WhiteHouse ๐Ÿ›๏ธ @DeptofDefens ๐Ÿ” @CISAgov ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง @GOVUK ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ @EU_Commission IT IS TIME TO SERIOUSLY EVALUATE THE INTERNET COMPUTER, $ICP, BUILT BY @dfinity ! Governments spend billions protecting sensitive information, yet conventional systems remain vulnerable to compromised credentials, misconfigurations and unauthorised access. THE TECHNOLOGY TO BUILD DIFFERENTLY ALREADY EXISTS! ๐Ÿ“‚ โ™พ๏ธ WHAT INTERNET COMPUTER OFFERS โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Chain-key cryptography โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช Internet Identity authentication โ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ Tamper-evident application state โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Programmable access controls โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”‘ Threshold cryptographic signatures โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“œ Verifiable application data โ”ฃ โ˜๏ธ Decentralised computing infrastructure โ”— ๐ŸŒ Sovereign digital infrastructure possibilities THIS IS BIGGER THAN CRYPTOCURRENCY! Weโ€™re talking about protecting citizens, military personnel, national records and critical government applications. ICP offers building blocks for applications where authorisation, accountability and data integrity can be enforced cryptographically. Of course, no blockchain automatically makes classified systems secure. Sensitive records still require encryption, isolation, rigorous access management and independent security assessment. BUT WHY SHOULD GOVERNMENTS IGNORE AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT COMPUTING ARCHITECTURE? ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ UNITED STATES ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง UNITED KINGDOM ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ EUROPEAN UNION ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ SAUDI ARABIA ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช UNITED ARAB EMIRATES THE CHALLENGE IS GLOBAL! Iโ€™M CALLING ON GOVERNMENTS TO INVESTIGATE, TEST AND EVALUATE $ICP FOR SUITABLE PUBLIC-SECTOR APPLICATIONS. NOT BECAUSE OF ITS TOKEN PRICE. BECAUSE OF WHAT THE TECHNOLOGY CAN DO! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties @USGS @NIST @DHSgov @NATO @EU_Commission @GOVUK @DGA_SA @SDAIA_SA @UNDP @WorldBank โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! ๐ŸŒ internetcomputer.org #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #CyberSecurity #NationalSecurity #DigitalSovereignty #Government #Blockchain ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
2
174
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” A MESSAGE TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND EVERY GOVERNMENT ON EARTH! NATIONAL SECURITY MUST INCLUDE DIGITAL SECURITY! Reports allege that a Pentagon-related security breach exposed personal information belonging to MORE THAN 3 MILLION PEOPLE, including military personnel and veterans. The reported information includes: ๐Ÿ“‚ SENSITIVE PERSONAL DATA โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช Social Security numbers โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“… Dates of birth โ”ฃ ๐ŸŽ–๏ธ Military occupational information โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ‘ฅ Personal identification records โ”— ๐Ÿšจ Alleged unauthorised access over several months If confirmed, this represents a serious failure to protect sensitive information. AND HERE IS MY MESSAGE TO WASHINGTON! ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ @WhiteHouse ๐Ÿ›๏ธ @DeptofDefens ๐Ÿ” @CISAgov ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง @GOVUK ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ @EU_Commission IT IS TIME TO SERIOUSLY EVALUATE THE INTERNET COMPUTER, $ICP, BUILT BY @dfinity ! Governments spend billions protecting sensitive information, yet conventional systems remain vulnerable to compromised credentials, misconfigurations and unauthorised access. THE TECHNOLOGY TO BUILD DIFFERENTLY ALREADY EXISTS! ๐Ÿ“‚ โ™พ๏ธ WHAT INTERNET COMPUTER OFFERS โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Chain-key cryptography โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช Internet Identity authentication โ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ Tamper-evident application state โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Programmable access controls โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”‘ Threshold cryptographic signatures โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“œ Verifiable application data โ”ฃ โ˜๏ธ Decentralised computing infrastructure โ”— ๐ŸŒ Sovereign digital infrastructure possibilities THIS IS BIGGER THAN CRYPTOCURRENCY! Weโ€™re talking about protecting citizens, military personnel, national records and critical government applications. ICP offers building blocks for applications where authorisation, accountability and data integrity can be enforced cryptographically. Of course, no blockchain automatically makes classified systems secure. Sensitive records still require encryption, isolation, rigorous access management and independent security assessment. BUT WHY SHOULD GOVERNMENTS IGNORE AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT COMPUTING ARCHITECTURE? ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ UNITED STATES ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง UNITED KINGDOM ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ EUROPEAN UNION ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ SAUDI ARABIA ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช UNITED ARAB EMIRATES THE CHALLENGE IS GLOBAL! Iโ€™M CALLING ON GOVERNMENTS TO INVESTIGATE, TEST AND EVALUATE $ICP FOR SUITABLE PUBLIC-SECTOR APPLICATIONS. NOT BECAUSE OF ITS TOKEN PRICE. BECAUSE OF WHAT THE TECHNOLOGY CAN DO! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties @USGS @NIST @DHSgov @NATO @EU_Commission @GOVUK @DGA_SA @SDAIA_SA @UNDP @WorldBank โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! ๐ŸŒ internetcomputer.org #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #CyberSecurity #NationalSecurity #DigitalSovereignty #Government #Blockchain ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
Replying to @MarioNawfal
Millions exposed. A 12-month fix? Officials say the Pentagon breach affected 3M+ people, exposing Social Security numbers, birth dates and some military job details. Up to 12 months of credit monitoring cannot make that data private again.
2
1
4
248
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” WHAT IF EVERY TIKTOK-STYLE VIDEO COULD BECOME ITS OWN CRYPTOCURRENCY? AND THE ACTUAL VIDEO WAS STORED DIRECTLY ON THE BLOCKCHAIN? ๐Ÿš€ WELCOME TO SOON LAUNCHPAD, BUILT ON THE INTERNET COMPUTER! ๐ŸŒ soonlaunchpad.fun This isnโ€™t just another video-sharing application. Itโ€™s an experiment combining social media, token markets, decentralised storage and a self-funding economic model. ๐Ÿ“‚ ๐ŸŽฌ HOW SOON WORKS โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“ฑ TikTok-style video feed โ”ฃ ๐ŸŽฅ MP4 videos stored in ICP canisters โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ†“ Free to upload and watch โ”ฃ ๐Ÿช™ Every video has its own bonding curve โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“ˆ Viewers can trade video-linked assets โ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ Trading logic runs on-chain โ”— โ™พ๏ธ No conventional cloud storage required BUT HERE IS WHERE IT GETS INTERESTING! Instead of deploying an expensive individual token ledger for every video, SOON initially records each video and its trading positions inside a shared canister. When a video reaches 36.63 ICP in backing, its graduation process begins automatically. ๐Ÿ“‚ ๐Ÿš€ TOKEN GRADUATION โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿช™ Deploys an ICRC-1 token ledger โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ’ฐ Uses the videoโ€™s backing reserve โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”„ Allocates tokens to existing holders โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ’ง Seeds an ICPSwap liquidity pool โ”— ๐Ÿ” Sends LP ownership to aaaaa-aa THATโ€™S AUTOMATED TOKEN CREATION DIRECTLY FROM SOCIAL CONTENT! AND THE ECONOMICS ARE EVEN MORE INTERESTING! ๐Ÿ“‚ ๐Ÿ”ฅ TWO TYPES OF CYCLES CONSUMPTION โ”ƒ โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Watching videos consumes computation and storage resources โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ’ฐ Trading generates platform fees โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”„ A portion of fees is allocated to Cycles โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”ฅ Surplus Cycles can be deliberately destroyed โ”— โ™พ๏ธ Fee revenue is designed to fund hosting costs The developer reports 323.8 BILLION CYCLES consumed serving the feed at the time of publication. The separate fee-funded Cycles burn counter was still ZERO โ€” an important distinction. NO TOKEN SALE. NO SNS FUNDRAISE. NO INITIAL TREASURY. JUST AN APPLICATION DESIGNED TO FUND ITS OWN OPERATION THROUGH ACTUAL USAGE! ๐Ÿ“‚ ๐Ÿ“Š INITIAL MAINNET FIGURES โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐ŸŽฌ 9 Videos โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ 44.5 MB Stored On-chain โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ’ฐ 0.67 ICP Trading Volume โ”— ๐ŸŒ Live on ICP Mainnet These are the developerโ€™s launch figures from 11 September, not current totals. SMALL NUMBERS? ABSOLUTELY! BUT THAT IS HOW NEW APPLICATIONS START. THE REVOLUTIONARY PART IS THE ARCHITECTURE! A social platform where content, application logic, token creation, trading mechanisms and hosting economics can operate within one blockchain ecosystem. THIS IS WHAT FULL-STACK BLOCKCHAIN COMPUTING MAKES POSSIBLE! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties ๐ŸŒ @soonlaunchpad #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #SOON #SocialFi #Blockchain #Web3 #OnChain ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
1
4
196
Welsh ICP Conviction.ICP ๐Ÿด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ท๓ ฌ๓ ณ๓ ฟ๐Ÿ‰ retweeted
The New Cloud Era is exclusively onchain. $ICP
5
32
1
191
2,736
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” 78.9 BILLION CYCLES PER SECOND! NOW LOOK AT THE DOLLAR VALUE OF THAT COMPUTATION! ๐Ÿš€ AWWWW YEAHHHH! โ™พ๏ธ THE INTERNET COMPUTER DASHBOARD IS APPROACHING 80 BILLION CYCLES PER SECOND! ๐Ÿ“‚ ๐Ÿ”ฅ LATEST NETWORK FIGURES\ โ”ƒ\ โ”ฃ โšก 78.9 BILLION Cycles/sec\ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“ˆ Earlier: 52.4 BILLION/sec\ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿš€ Increase: +50.57%\ โ”— ๐ŸŽฏ Next milestone: 80 BILLION/sec NOW LET'S PUT REAL DOLLAR FIGURES AGAINST THAT COMPUTATION! Based on an illustrative ICP price of $3.42 and 2.4339 trillion Cycles per ICP: ๐Ÿ“‚ ๐Ÿ’ฐ ESTIMATED COMPUTATION COST\ โ”ƒ\ โ”ฃ โฑ๏ธ Per Second: $0.11\ โ”ฃ โฐ Per Minute: $6.65\ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ• Per Hour: $399\ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“… Per Day: $9,581\ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“† Per Week: $67,066\ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—“๏ธ Per 30 Days: $287,424\ โ”— ๐ŸŒ Per Year: $3.50 MILLION! THAT'S APPROXIMATELY 2,801 ICP PER DAY IN COMPUTATION COST EQUIVALENT! AND THIS IS WHY I KEEP WATCHING NETWORK ECONOMICS! ๐Ÿ“‚ WHAT CYCLES POWER\ โ”ƒ\ โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ On-chain applications\ โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Smart contract execution\ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ Decentralised storage\ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿค– AI agent infrastructure\ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Cryptographic operations\ โ”— โ˜๏ธ Blockchain cloud computing ICP IS BURNED TO CREATE CYCLES. REAL COMPUTATIONAL DEMAND IS WHAT MATTERS! BUT THE BIGGER PICTURE IS CLEAR! THE INTERNET COMPUTER IS BUILDING A COMPUTING ECONOMY, NOT JUST ANOTHER TOKEN NETWORK! WHILE OTHERS WATCH THE PRICE CHARTS, I'M WATCHING THE COMPUTATION BEHIND THE NETWORK! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. I'M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties ๐ŸŒ dashboard.internetcomputer.oโ€ฆ \#ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #Cycles #Blockchain #CloudComputing #Web3 ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address:\ 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
7
25
443
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” AWWWW YEAHHHH! 73.7 BILLION CYCLES PER SECOND! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€๐Ÿš€ THE INTERNET COMPUTER DASHBOARD IS LIGHTING UP! And Iโ€™m watching every move! ๐Ÿ‘€ ๐Ÿ“‚ ๐Ÿ”ฅ LATEST CYCLES BURN RATE โ”ƒ โ”ฃ โฐ Earlier: 52.4 BILLION/sec โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“ˆ 19:37: 69.4 BILLION/sec โ”ฃ ๐Ÿš€ 19:56: 73.7 BILLION/sec โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”ฅ Increase: +40.65% โ”— ๐ŸŽฏ Next milestone: 80 BILLION/sec THATโ€™S AN EXTRA 21.3 BILLION CYCLES PER SECOND COMPARED WITH THE EARLIER SNAPSHOT! ๐Ÿ“‚ IF THIS RATE IS SUSTAINED โ”ƒ โ”ฃ โšก 73.7 BILLION cycles/second โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”ฅ 6.37 QUADRILLION cycles/day โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ 44.57 QUADRILLION cycles/week โ”— โ™พ๏ธ 191.03 QUADRILLION cycles/30 days NOW THINK ABOUT WHAT CYCLES ACTUALLY REPRESENT! โš™๏ธ Smart contract execution ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ On-chain storage ๐ŸŒ Decentralised applications ๐Ÿค– AI agent infrastructure ๐Ÿ” Cryptographic operations โ›“๏ธ Blockchain computation CYCLES ARE THE FUEL OF THE INTERNET COMPUTER! And ICP is burned to create Cycles, linking real computational demand to the networkโ€™s token economics. BUT LOOK AT THAT CHART! ๐Ÿ“ˆ FROM 52.4 BILLION TO 73.7 BILLION! THE NEXT TARGET IS 80 BILLION CYCLES PER SECOND! Iโ€™M NOT WATCHING CANDLESTICKS. Iโ€™M WATCHING COMPUTATION, INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ENTIRE DECENTRALISED CLOUD ECOSYSTEM! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties ๐ŸŒ dashboard.internetcomputer.oโ€ฆ #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #Blockchain #Cycles #Web3 #CloudComputing #AI ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
4
13
323
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” 69.4 BILLION CYCLES BURNED EVERY SECOND! THE INTERNET COMPUTER DASHBOARD IS SHOWING A MAJOR INCREASE! ๐Ÿ“‚ LATEST NETWORK FIGURESโ€จโ”ƒโ€จโ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”ฅ Cycles Burn: 69.4 BILLION/secโ€จโ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“ˆ Previous: 52.4 BILLION/secโ€จโ”ฃ ๐Ÿš€ Increase: +32.44%โ€จโ”ฃ โšก Transactions: 5,507/secโ€จโ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ Mainnet Subnets: 42โ€จโ”— ๐ŸŒ Node Machines: 618 AT THIS RATE, THAT EQUATES TO APPROXIMATELY 6 QUADRILLION CYCLES PER DAY! And this is why I keep watching the underlying infrastructure rather than simply looking at the $ICP price. Cycles power computation, storage and other network operations. More sustained, genuine consumption means more demand for the resources that keep applications running. THE NEXT TEST IS WHETHER THIS HIGHER RATE IS SUSTAINED! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties ๐ŸŒ dashboard.internetcomputer.oโ€ฆ #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #Blockchain #Cycles ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: โ€จ1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
11
24
400
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” 1,350 BLOCKS FINALISED EVERY SECOND! THE INTERNET COMPUTER NETWORK IS MOVING! ๐Ÿ“‚ LATEST ICP DASHBOARD โ”ƒ โ”ฃ โšก 1,350.82 Blocks Finalised/Second โ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ 42 Mainnet Subnets โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ 618 Node Machines โ”ฃ ๐Ÿข 72 Node Providers โ”— ๐ŸŒ 92 Data Centres ๐Ÿ“ˆ FINALIZATION RATE UP 30.95%! Previous: 1,031.55 blocks/sec Latest: 1,350.82 blocks/sec Increase: +319.27 blocks/sec THINK ABOUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEHIND THOSE NUMBERS! A globally distributed blockchain network running replicated computation, smart contracts and complete applications. And remember, these are network-wide block finalizations across multiple subnets, not 1,350 transactions per second. THIS IS WHAT REAL BLOCKCHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE LOOKS LIKE! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties ๐ŸŒ dashboard.internetcomputer.oโ€ฆ #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #Blockchain ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
3
10
29
524
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” HACKERS TURN FRENCH SUPERMARKET FREEZERS INTO HEATERS! ๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN CYBERATTACKS CROSS INTO PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE! On 12 October, French supermarket chains confirmed cyberattacks targeting refrigeration systems. ๐Ÿ“‚ REPORTED IMPACT โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿช 150โ€“200 Intermarchรฉ stores targeted โ”ฃ ๐Ÿฌ Nearly 100 Coopรฉrative U outlets โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒก๏ธ Defrost settings reportedly forced to 50ยฐC โ”ฃ ๐Ÿฅฉ Fresh and frozen food destroyed โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ’ถ Potential losses running into millions โ”— ๐Ÿšจ French prosecutors investigating Imagine opening your supermarket freezers in the morning and being hit by a wave of warm air! THIS WASNโ€™T ABOUT STEALING CRYPTO OR CUSTOMER PASSWORDS. IT WAS ABOUT REMOTELY MANIPULATING EQUIPMENT THAT PROTECTS THE FOOD SUPPLY! NOW CONSIDER WHAT @dfinity IS BUILDING WITH $ICP. ๐Ÿ“‚ INTERNET COMPUTER โ€” SECURITY CAPABILITIES โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Cryptographic authentication โ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ Tamper-evident application state โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Programmable access controls โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช Internet Identity โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”‘ Threshold cryptography โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“œ Auditable application logic โ”— โ™พ๏ธ Decentralised computing ICP can provide verifiable application logic, secure authorisation and auditable records for supporting infrastructure systems. But blockchain alone cannot protect an industrial controller from compromised firmware, stolen credentials or unsafe remote access. PHYSICAL SAFETY STILL REQUIRES INDEPENDENT CONTROLS, NETWORK SEGMENTATION AND FAIL-SAFE ENGINEERING! France has spent years debating food sovereignty. Now a cyberattack has demonstrated how vulnerable food infrastructure can become when connected control systems are compromised. THE NEXT GENERATION OF DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY MUST INCLUDE CYBER-PHYSICAL SECURITY! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties #ICP #InternetComputer #Cybersecurity #France #DigitalSovereignty #Blockchain ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
Cyberattack on French supermarkers. Someone remotely took over refrigeration controllers and made them to defrost. Target temperature set to 50ยฐC. Staff opening freezers in the morning were hit by a wave of hot air. Millions of euros lost. France spent years debating food sovereignty to depend on a firmware update? bfmtv.com/economie/consommatโ€ฆ
1
5
1
18
537
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” $141 MILLION IN 24-HOUR TRADING VOLUME, RUNNING 100% ON-CHAIN! THIS IS WHAT THE INTERNET COMPUTER IS CAPABLE OF! A decentralised trading platform operating entirely through canister smart contracts, with plans for community ownership through NNS governance. ๐Ÿ“‚ PLATFORM STATISTICS โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ’ฐ Total Value Locked: $21.37M โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“ˆ 24H Trading Volume: $141.46M โ”ฃ ๐Ÿฆ Treasury: $4.19M โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”„ Active AMM Pools: 4 โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ Oracle Sources: 8 โ”ฃ โšก Oracle Refresh: Every 30 seconds โ”— โ›“๏ธ Execution: 100% On-chain ๐Ÿ“‚ 24-HOUR TRADING VOLUME โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐ŸŸ  BTC: $39.81M โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”ต ETH: $28.13M โ”ฃ โ™พ๏ธ ICP: $17.77M โ”— ๐ŸŸฃ SOL: $55.75M AND HERE IS WHAT MAKES THIS INTERESTING! The platform combines on-chain trading, automated market makers, order books, multi-source price oracles and treasury accounting. All within the Internet Computer ecosystem. Its oracle system aggregates prices from exchanges including Coinbase, Kraken, Binance, OKX and others. โš ๏ธ The dashboard also reports 660 oracle failures, demonstrating why reliability and independent scrutiny matter. BUT HERE IS THE CRITICAL DISTINCTION! ๐Ÿšจ THIS IS CURRENTLY PLAY MODE! The assets are simulated, so the reported $141.46M trading volume, $21.37M TVL and $4.19M treasury must NOT be confused with verified real-money trading activity or realised revenue. THE FIGURES DEMONSTRATE PLATFORM ACTIVITY, NOT YET COMMERCIAL ADOPTION! Nevertheless, the architecture is significant. ๐Ÿ“‚ $ICP โ€” THE BIGGER PICTURE โ”ƒ โ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ On-chain trading infrastructure โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“Š Decentralised price aggregation โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Smart contract execution โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ’ง Automated liquidity mechanisms โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ Potential NNS governance โ”— โ™พ๏ธ Blockchain-native financial applications THIS IS WHAT I KEEP SAYING! $ICP IS NOT JUST ABOUT MOVING TOKENS. IT IS ABOUT RUNNING COMPLETE FINANCIAL APPLICATIONS ON-CHAIN! The next milestones are technical validation, security, real-world deployment and governance approval. โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #DeFi #Blockchain #OnChain ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
Can $ICP's MULTI/DEX stop exchange hacks? Bitget lost $387M in September. Two days later Dom posted โ€œSolution: MULTI/DEX โ€ฆ Prod soon.โ€ I had Claude investigate what works, whatโ€™s missing, in DFINITYโ€™s own words ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโฌ‡๏ธ A Cloud Foundation Production โ˜๏ธโ™พ๏ธ
1
11
30
590
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” THE NUMBER GOES UP THESIS IS BIGGER THAN PRICE SPECULATION! Three developments worth watching: ๐ŸŒ 1๏ธโƒฃ .ICP DOMAIN @dfinity has applied for the .icp top-level domain. If approved by ICANN and delegated, it could bring ICP-branded addresses into conventional DNS infrastructure. โ˜๏ธ 2๏ธโƒฃ CLOUD ENGINES + OPEN SAAS Dedicated blockchain compute environments, AI agents and a proposed open-source SaaS ecosystem. The opportunity is enormous, but adoption and commercial rollout still need to be demonstrated. ๐Ÿ”ฅ 3๏ธโƒฃ ON-CHAIN REVENUE More real application usage means greater demand for Cycles, which are created by burning ICP. A sustained increase in genuine network consumption matters far more than speculative trading volume. ๐Ÿ“‚ MY $ICP INVESTMENT THESIS โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ Internet infrastructure โ”ฃ ๐Ÿค– AI-powered applications โ”ฃ โ˜๏ธ Decentralised cloud computing โ”ฃ ๐Ÿข Open SaaS โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”ฅ Real network consumption โ”— โ™พ๏ธ Long-term ecosystem growth An ICANN approval, Cloud Engines adoption and new consumption records would be meaningful catalysts โ€” but they are not guaranteed outcomes. Iโ€™M NOT HERE TO CHASE A LEVERAGED TRADE ON @HTXFutures. Iโ€™M WATCHING WHETHER THE INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERS! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
5
23
421
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” 20 FACTS ABOUT THE INTERNET COMPUTER THAT COULD REVOLUTIONISE BLOCKCHAIN! 1๏ธโƒฃ Full-stack on-chain applications 2๏ธโƒฃ WebAssembly smart contracts 3๏ธโƒฃ On-chain website hosting 4๏ธโƒฃ Passwordless Internet Identity 5๏ธโƒฃ Chain-key cryptography 6๏ธโƒฃ Native Bitcoin integration 7๏ธโƒฃ Ethereum integration 8๏ธโƒฃ Threshold ECDSA/Schnorr signatures 9๏ธโƒฃ Autonomous AI agent logic ๐Ÿ”Ÿ HTTPS API outcalls 1๏ธโƒฃ1๏ธโƒฃ Reverse gas model 1๏ธโƒฃ2๏ธโƒฃ Cycles-powered computation 1๏ธโƒฃ3๏ธโƒฃ NNS decentralised governance 1๏ธโƒฃ4๏ธโƒฃ SNS application governance 1๏ธโƒฃ5๏ธโƒฃ Rapid transaction finality 1๏ธโƒฃ6๏ธโƒฃ Scalable subnet architecture 1๏ธโƒฃ7๏ธโƒฃ Cryptographically certified data 1๏ธโƒฃ8๏ธโƒฃ Persistent on-chain storage 1๏ธโƒฃ9๏ธโƒฃ VetKeys encryption technology 2๏ธโƒฃ0๏ธโƒฃ Chain Fusion interoperability ๐ŸŒ FRONTEND + BACKEND + STORAGE + IDENTITY + AI + CRYPTOGRAPHY + GOVERNANCE. ALL WITHIN ONE BLOCKCHAIN ECOSYSTEM! THIS IS NOT JUST ANOTHER CRYPTOCURRENCY. IT IS INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A DECENTRALISED INTERNET! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #Web3 #AI ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
1
13
313
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” 6.8 MILLION IDENTITY RECORDS ALLEGEDLY EXPOSED IN THE DOMINICAN REPUBLIC! ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ด A threat actor claims to possess approximately 6.8 MILLION citizen records and 5.6 MILLION photographs allegedly taken from the Dominican Republicโ€™s electoral registration system. โš ๏ธ IMPORTANT: THIS CLAIM REMAINS UNVERIFIED. No official confirmation of a breach has been established. But if authentic, the implications for national digital identity security are serious! ๐Ÿ“‚ REPORTED DATA EXPOSURE โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ‘ฅ 6.8 million citizen records โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“ธ 5.6 million photographs โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช National identity numbers โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ‘ค Full names โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“… Dates and places of birth โ”ฃ โš–๏ธ Sex and marital status โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ SQL-format sample reportedly shared โ”— โš ๏ธ Status: UNVERIFIED THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT STOLEN PASSWORDS! Passwords can be changed. BUT YOUR FACE, DATE OF BIRTH AND NATIONAL IDENTITY HISTORY CANNOT EASILY BE REPLACED! If verified, such exposure could enable identity theft, impersonation, targeted phishing and AI-assisted fraud. NOW LOOK AT WHAT @dfinity HAS BUILT WITH $ICP. ๐Ÿ“‚ INTERNET COMPUTER โ€” DIGITAL IDENTITY โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช Internet Identity โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Cryptographic authentication โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ‘† Passwordless passkeys โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”‘ Hardware security key support โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ Single sign-on โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Application-specific pseudonymous identities โ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ Canister smart contracts โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Programmable access controls โ”— โ™พ๏ธ Decentralised infrastructure Internet Identity enables secure authentication without traditional passwords or unnecessarily exposing the same identity across multiple applications. Canister smart contracts can enforce permissions directly within the application. THAT IS A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO DIGITAL SECURITY! Of course, Internet Identity does not automatically replace national ID systems or make data breaches impossible. But cryptographic authentication, data minimisation and privacy-preserving application design can reduce unnecessary exposure. ๐Ÿ“‚ WHAT GOVERNMENTS SHOULD PRIORITISE โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Cryptographic security โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช Privacy-preserving verification โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Data minimisation โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ‘ค Citizen privacy โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Enforceable access controls โ”— ๐ŸŒ Digital sovereignty ๐Ÿ›๏ธ Governments ๐Ÿฆ Banks ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ Electoral authorities ๐Ÿฅ Healthcare providers ๐ŸŒ International institutions ALL SHOULD BE EXAMINING THESE TECHNOLOGIES! A DARK WEB CLAIM IS NOT PROOF OF A BREACH. BUT THE GLOBAL DIGITAL IDENTITY SECURITY CHALLENGE IS VERY REAL! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties @UNDP @WorldBank @BIS_org @EU_Commission ๐ŸŒ internetcomputer.org #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #DominicanRepublic #Cybersecurity #InternetIdentity #DataPrivacy #Blockchain #DigitalSovereignty ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
1
5
32
613
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” DID INTERNET COMPUTER NETWORK COMPUTATION REALLY DROP BY 50%? THE ON-CHAIN EVIDENCE SUGGESTS OTHERWISE! Excellent investigative work by @ICPulse_io , highlighting why independent verification matters in blockchain infrastructure. On 10 October, the ICP Dashboardโ€™s reported cycles burn rate suddenly dropped from approximately 48 billion to 20 billion cycles per second. BUT DID NETWORK COMPUTATION ACTUALLY COLLAPSE? THE REPORTED ON-CHAIN DATA SUGGESTS NOT! ๐Ÿ“‚ ICP NETWORK โ€” TECHNICAL FINDINGS โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ Subnets examined: 42 โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Certified counters: 47.1 billion cycles/sec โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“Š Dashboard: 21.2 billion cycles/sec โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“‰ Reporting discrepancy: 55% โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”„ Difference: 2.22ร— โ”ฃ โฑ๏ธ Measurement period: 11.7 hours โ”— โš™๏ธ Execution metrics: No corresponding decline THAT IS A SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE! According to the investigation, all 42 subnets experienced a similar dashboard decline at approximately the same time. Yet message execution, instruction rates and block production remained broadly unchanged. THAT IS NOT WHAT A GENUINE NETWORK-WIDE COLLAPSE IN COMPUTATION WOULD NORMALLY LOOK LIKE! ๐Ÿ“‚ HOW WAS THIS INVESTIGATED? โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Queried subnet read_state metrics โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Examined consumed_cycles_total โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ Sampled all 42 subnets โ”ฃ โฑ๏ธ Compared readings 11.7 hours apart โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“Š Calculated consumption from counter changes โ”— ๐Ÿงฎ Compared results with dashboard figures The longer sampling interval is important. The consumed_cycles_total metric can fluctuate over short periods because prepaid execution cycles may subsequently be refunded. Short samples can therefore produce misleading results. ๐Ÿ“‚ IMPLIED DAILY CYCLES CONSUMPTION โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Certified estimate: 4.07 quadrillion โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“Š Dashboard estimate: 1.83 quadrillion โ”— โš ๏ธ Difference: 2.24 quadrillion cycles AND HERE IS AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION! ๐Ÿ“‚ TWO DIFFERENT MEASUREMENTS โ”ƒ โ”ฃ โ™พ๏ธ CYCLES CONSUMPTION โ”ƒ โ”— Computational resource accounting โ”ƒ โ”— ๐Ÿ”ฅ ICP LEDGER BURN โ”— ICP tokens burned through ledger transactions These are related to network economics, but they are NOT interchangeable. A discrepancy in the dashboardโ€™s cycles consumption chart does not automatically mean ICP token burning has changed. The investigators also reported that the dashboard metric periodically falls towards zero around 01:00 UTC while execution activity remains stable. That raises further questions about the reporting pipeline. BUT THE PRECISE CAUSE HAS NOT YET BEEN CONFIRMED. A dashboard calculation change, aggregation issue or telemetry processing problem remains a possibility. ๐Ÿ“‚ WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN NEXT? โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Review the dashboard aggregation method โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Examine recent telemetry changes โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Reconcile certified subnet counters โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“Š Verify historical consumption figures โ”ฃ ๐Ÿงฎ Reproduce the reported discrepancy โ”— ๐Ÿ“ข Publish a technical explanation THIS IS EXACTLY WHY I SUPPORT TRANSPARENT, VERIFIABLE BLOCKCHAIN INFRASTRUCTURE! A dashboard should never be treated as unquestionable truth. Independent researchers must be able to challenge reported figures using underlying network evidence. And $ICP provides publicly accessible governance and protocol information that helps make this kind of technical scrutiny possible. The reported findings do not support the conclusion that network computation suddenly halved. They support further investigation into why the dashboard and certified-counter estimates diverged. CREDIT TO @ICPulse FOR DOING THE TECHNICAL WORK! Now we await clarification from @dfinity. โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE, THE COMPUTATION AND THE DATA BEHIND IT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties ๐ŸŒ app.icpulse.io ๐ŸŒ internetcomputer.org #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #ICPulse #Blockchain #Cycles #NetworkMetrics #Transparency ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
The ICP dashboardโ€™s cycle burn rate halved on 10 October. The networkโ€™s cycle burn did not. We checked on-chain. On 10 October between 12:30 and 14:00 UTC the dashboardโ€™s cycle burn rate stepped from about 48 to about 20 billion cycles per second and has stayed there. Every one of the 42 subnets dropped at the same minute and by a similar factor. Message execution, instruction rate and block rate did not move. That shape, every subnet at once and computation unchanged, is not what demand falling looks like. So we went to the source. Each subnet certifies a consumed_cycles_total counter in its state, readable through read_state on subnet//metrics (thanks to Lorimer for the pointer). We sampled all 42 subnets at 16:23 UTC on 11 October and again at 04:05 UTC on 12 October, took the median of several reads each time, and divided the summed delta by the elapsed certified time. On-chain: 47.1 billion cycles per second. Dashboard, same 11.7 hour window: 21.2. 47 is the level the dashboard itself showed for all of September. Per subnet the ratio is about 2.2x everywhere: tdb26 5.1 on-chain against 2.4 on the dashboard, pzp6e 4.2 against 1.4. The network is burning what it burned last week. The dashboard series changed on 10 October, and since then it also drops toward zero for about two hours every night around 01:00 UTC while execution metrics stay flat, which looks like a nightly job in the metricโ€™s pipeline rather than anything on the network. We have asked on the DFINITY forum (forum.dfinity.org/t/dashboarโ€ฆ) whether this is a known change on the ic-api side. Until that is answered, read the dashboardโ€™s cycle burn chart with a 2.2x correction, or read the ledgerโ€™s ICP burn instead, which is a different measurement and was never affected. Two things this does not say: why the dashboard changed, and that anyone did anything wrong. A metric moved; the chain did not. A note on method, since the counter has a trap: consumed_cycles_total wobbles by a few trillion between reads seconds apart, because in-flight prepaid execution is counted and refunded. Two samples a minute apart give nonsense. Hours apart, it is solid. ICP burned on the ledger, the figure that matters for supply, is on our Net Emission page and was untouched by any of this. app.icpulse.io #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #onchain #ICPulse
1
6
29
713
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” KFC NAMED IN LATEST RANSOMWARE CLAIM! ANOTHER WARNING FOR GLOBAL ENTERPRISE CYBERSECURITY! The Gentlemen ransomware group has reportedly listed KFC USA as a potential victim. โš ๏ธ IMPORTANT: The claim remains UNVERIFIED. No confirmed data exposure, affected systems or operational disruption has been established. But the wider cybersecurity threat is very real! ๐Ÿ“‚ KFC โ€” REPORTED CYBER ALERT โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ Country: United States โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ— Organisation: KFC โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ’ป Threat actor: The Gentlemen โ”ฃ ๐Ÿข Sector: Hospitality โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“… Observed: 10 October 2026 โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ Data exposure: Not specified โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Compromised systems: Not confirmed โ”— โš ๏ธ Status: PENDING VERIFICATION The Gentlemen is an established ransomware-as-a-service operation associated with data theft, file encryption and double extortion. Its known techniques include credential abuse, lateral movement, attempts to disable security tools and attacks on recovery infrastructure. THIS IS WHY ENTERPRISE CYBERSECURITY CANNOT RELY ON PERIMETER DEFENCES ALONE! ๐Ÿ“‚ TRADITIONAL ENTERPRISE ATTACK SURFACES โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ Centralised application servers โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ Shared databases โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”‘ Compromised administrator credentials โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ Exposed remote access services โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”„ Lateral network movement โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ’พ Vulnerable backup infrastructure โ”— ๐Ÿšจ Ransomware and data extortion NOW LOOK AT WHAT @dfinity IS BUILDING WITH $ICP. ๐Ÿ“‚ INTERNET COMPUTER โ€” A DIFFERENT SECURITY ARCHITECTURE โ”ƒ โ”ฃ โ›“๏ธ Canister smart contracts โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Chain-key cryptography โ”ฃ ๐Ÿชช Internet Identity โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ‘† Passkey-based authentication โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Smart contract-enforced permissions โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ Replicated on-chain application state โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ Full-stack application hosting โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”„ Decentralised execution โ”— โ™พ๏ธ Cycles-based computation The Internet Computer allows developers to run application logic and store persistent state within canister smart contracts. Internet Identity supports passwordless authentication and application-specific pseudonymous identities. Smart contracts can enforce permissions and reduce dependence on conventional centralised application servers. THIS IS A FUNDAMENTALLY DIFFERENT APPROACH TO DIGITAL INFRASTRUCTURE! But letโ€™s be technically precise. ICP does not make ransomware, stolen credentials, vulnerable applications or data breaches impossible. Sensitive information still requires appropriate encryption, access controls, secure development and independent auditing. THE REAL OPPORTUNITY IS TO REDESIGN APPLICATION ARCHITECTURE AND REDUCE UNNECESSARY ATTACK SURFACES. ๐Ÿ›๏ธ Governments ๐Ÿฆ Banks ๐Ÿ— Global hospitality chains ๐Ÿฅ Healthcare providers ๐Ÿข Multinational corporations ๐ŸŒ International institutions All should be examining how verifiable computing, cryptographic identity and decentralised application infrastructure could strengthen their security strategies. AND REMEMBER โ€” A RANSOMWARE GROUPโ€™S CLAIM IS NOT PROOF OF A SUCCESSFUL BREACH. VERIFY THE EVIDENCE BEFORE DECLARING AN ORGANISATION COMPROMISED! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties @kfc ๐ŸŒ internetcomputer.org #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #KFC #Ransomware #Cybersecurity #InternetIdentity #Blockchain #Web3 #DigitalSovereignty ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
๐ŸšจCyber Alert โ€ผ๏ธ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธUnited States - ๐—ž๐—™๐—– The Gentlemen ransomware group claims to have breached KFC. Threat actor: The Gentlemen Sector: Hospitality Data exposure (claimed): Not specified Data type: Not specified Observed: Oct 10, 2026 Status: Pending verification ESIXยฉ: 5.23 Full details and impact assessment on HackRisk.io
1
5
20
486
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” ANOTHER IMPORTANT INTERNET COMPUTER UPGRADE IS NOW OPEN FOR GOVERNANCE VOTING! The Network Nervous System (NNS) is considering a new GuestOS release that includes infrastructure improvements for Cloud Engines, subnet operations and canister HTTP outcalls. THIS IS THE KIND OF ENGINEERING PROGRESS I WATCH CLOSELY! ๐Ÿ“‚ NNS GOVERNANCE โ€” NEW PROPOSAL โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ Type: Revise Elected GuestOS Versions โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“… Created: 11 October 2026 โ”ฃ ๐ŸŸข Status: OPEN โ€” Accepting Votes โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Release: 2026-10-08_03-33 โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Revision: 245c12e โ”— ๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ Component: IC/GuestOS ๐Ÿ“‚ WHAT DOES THIS RELEASE INCLUDE? โ”ƒ โ”ฃ โ˜๏ธ ALL-IN-ONE NODES FOR CLOUD ENGINES โ”ƒ โ”— Core protocol support for Cloud Engine node architecture โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”„ SUBNET SPLITTING โ”ƒ โ”— Updates to the handling of destination subnets โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ CANISTER HTTPS OUTCALLS โ”ƒ โ”— Support for serving canister HTTP responses outside a block โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“Š CYCLES ACCOUNTING โ”ƒ โ”— Monotonic tracking of consumed cycles โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ DELETED CANISTER METRICS โ”ƒ โ”— Improved accounting for consumed cycles โ”ƒ โ”— ๐Ÿ”ง NODE MAINTENANCE โ”— Updated base image references WHY DOES THIS MATTER? The Internet Computer is not standing still. Its core protocol continues to evolve across the infrastructure that supports decentralised applications, computing resources and network operations. And the inclusion of ALL-IN-ONE NODES FOR CLOUD ENGINES is particularly interesting as the Open Cloud ecosystem develops. Cloud Engines are designed to provide dedicated ICP computing environments, giving organisations greater choice over infrastructure providers, locations and hardware. THIS IS INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT, NOT JUST ANOTHER CRYPTO NARRATIVE! ๐Ÿ“‚ SECURITY AND VERIFICATION โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Reproducible GuestOS build verification โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“œ Published release commit โ”ฃ ๐Ÿงฎ SHA-256 image verification โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ NNS governance approval process โ”— ๐Ÿ”Ž Publicly reviewable release changes Importantly, this proposal is to ELECT a new GuestOS version. It does not mean the release has already been approved or deployed across the network. And election alone does not constitute deployment. That distinction matters. ๐Ÿ“‚ MY GOVERNANCE POSITION โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Review the release notes โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Verify the published build โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Examine protocol changes โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ Participate in NNS governance โ”— โ™พ๏ธ Support transparent network development My current voting power across three neurons: ๐Ÿ—ณ๏ธ 535,943.08 Every governance decision contributes to the long-term development of the Internet Computer. While much of the crypto market focuses on daily token prices, developers continue working on the underlying protocol. CLOUD ENGINES. SUBNET OPERATIONS. HTTPS OUTCALLS. CYCLES ACCOUNTING. VERIFIABLE SOFTWARE RELEASES. THIS IS HOW SERIOUS INFRASTRUCTURE GETS BUILT! โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties ๐Ÿ”— forum.dfinity.org/t/proposalโ€ฆ ๐ŸŒ internetcomputer.org #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #NNS #Governance #CloudEngines #OpenCloud #Blockchain #Web3 #Cybersecurity ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
1
9
30
699
๐Ÿšจโ™พ๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฅ $ICP โ€” WHICH BLOCKCHAIN CAN ACTUALLY RUN AN AUTONOMOUS AI AGENT? NOT JUST STORE ITS DATA. NOT JUST CONNECT TO AN AI MODEL. NOT JUST RECORD TRANSACTIONS FROM AN AGENT RUNNING ON AWS. I MEAN ACTUALLY RUN THE AGENTโ€™S LOGIC ON-CHAIN! This is where the Internet Computer, developed by @dfinity, offers something fundamentally different. An autonomous AI agent needs four essential capabilities: ๐Ÿ“‚ 1๏ธโƒฃ PERSISTENT MEMORY โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿง  Canister smart contract state โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ Persistent on-chain storage โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”„ State maintained between executions โ”— โ™พ๏ธ No external database required for core agent memory ๐Ÿ“‚ 2๏ธโƒฃ AUTONOMOUS EXECUTION โ”ƒ โ”ฃ โฐ Canister timers โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Scheduled smart contract execution โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”„ Automated workflows โ”— ๐Ÿš€ No external cron server required ๐Ÿ“‚ 3๏ธโƒฃ CRYPTOGRAPHIC SIGNING โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ” Threshold ECDSA and Schnorr signatures โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”‘ Distributed key management โ”ฃ โ‚ฟ Bitcoin transaction signing โ”ฃ โŸ  Ethereum transaction signing โ”— ๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ No complete signing key stored on one application server ๐Ÿ“‚ 4๏ธโƒฃ EXTERNAL CONNECTIVITY โ”ƒ โ”ฃ ๐ŸŒ HTTPS outcalls โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ”— External API integration โ”ฃ ๐Ÿ“Š Real-world data retrieval โ”ฃ โš™๏ธ Consensus-compatible response processing โ”— ๐Ÿค– Automated decisions using external information NOW THINK ABOUT WHAT THIS MEANS! An AI agent can maintain its own state, execute scheduled tasks, interact with external services and cryptographically authorise transactions. ALL THROUGH CANISTER SMART CONTRACTS RUNNING ON THE INTERNET COMPUTER! The networkโ€™s replicated execution model provides a different trust architecture from an agent whose critical logic runs entirely on a conventional cloud server. There are important technical distinctions. HTTPS responses must be transformed or otherwise handled consistently for replicated execution. Consensus does not independently guarantee that an external API is truthful. And large-model inference may still require external compute, although ICP can support AI inference workloads within its execution limits. BUT THE CORE AGENT CONTROL LOGIC DOES NOT HAVE TO LIVE ON AWS! ๐Ÿ“‚ THE REAL QUESTION FOR WEB3 AI โ”ƒ โ”ฃ โ“ Where does the agentโ€™s memory live? โ”ฃ โ“ What triggers its next action? โ”ฃ โ“ Who controls its signing authority? โ”ฃ โ“ Where is its decision logic executed? โ”ฃ โ“ Can it access external information? โ”— โ“ Can its execution be independently verified? THESE ARE ARCHITECTURAL QUESTIONS, NOT MARKETING SLOGANS! For governments, banks, enterprises and autonomous digital services, the ability to enforce agent permissions and execution logic through smart contracts could become increasingly important. โ™พ๏ธ $ICP โ€” THE MARKET IS WATCHING THE TOKEN. Iโ€™M WATCHING THE INFRASTRUCTURE BEING BUILT! @dfinity @dominic_w @PierreSamaties @ICPulse_io ๐ŸŒ internetcomputer.org #ICP #InternetComputer #DFINITY #AI #AIAgents #OnChainAI #Blockchain #Web3 #ChainKeyCryptography #AutonomousAgents ๐Ÿด Welsh ICP Conviction | @ICPLEGEND1966 โค๏ธ LIKE | ๐Ÿ” REPOST | ๐Ÿ’ฌ COMMENT โ™พ๏ธ ICP Donation Address: 1e672d038cebc619d93186418fa98f6499dbdb9cfdfac54f366c61a4a4ee4362
Which blockchain can actually run an AI agent? Not store its weights. Not log what it did. Run it. An agent needs four things: memory that persists, a way to wake itself up, a key it can sign with, and a way to reach the outside world. On every other chain all four sit on a server. The agent runs on AWS with a wallet, and the chain receives a receipt of a decision it had no part in. On the Internet Computer all four are on the network. Memory: state lives in the canister. No database elsewhere. Autonomy: timers. The canister wakes itself up. No cron job, no machine to keep alive. Keys: threshold signatures. The agent signs for itself and transacts on Bitcoin and Ethereum directly. There is no private key sitting on a server to steal. Reach: HTTPS outcalls. It calls an external API and the response passes through consensus before the agent acts on it. That last one is what people miss. Everywhere else, โ€œthe agent read the data and actedโ€ means one server read it and you took its word. Here the network agrees on what was read. Heavy model inference still mostly happens outside, and we are not going to pretend otherwise. But the agent itself, its memory, its keys, its ability to act with nobody pressing a button, is on chain. An agent that lives on a server you pay for monthly is a bot with a wallet. Which chain gives you the other three? Name it and we will go check. Founders list: app.icpulse.io/premium #ICP #InternetComputer #ICPulse #onchain
1
14
52
879